Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:06 AM Jun 2015

Schumer blasts airlines' proposal to reduce carry-on luggage size

http://www.newsday.com/news/region-state/charles-schumer-blasts-airlines-proposal-to-reduce-carry-on-bag-size-1.10541235
(snip)
He planned a news conference Sunday to warn travelers that a 20 percent reduction would force them to pay more for check-in fees or spend money on new luggage.

(snip)
"We want to blow the whistle on this before it happens," Schumer told The Associated Press. "Enough already! They charge a fee for peanuts, for leg room, for just about anything."


http://www.salon.com/2015/06/14/ny_senator_wants_airlines_to_scrap_carry_on_luggage_proposal/
New York Sen. Charles Schumer wants airlines to scrap a proposal to reduce the allowed size of carry-on luggage.

He warns that a 20 percent reduction would force travelers to pay more for check-in fees or spend money on millions of pieces of new luggage.

The Democratic senator says it’s just another way for airlines to make money at the expense of travelers.

Schumer says customers deserve a break, especially since airline profits are expected to soar this year.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Schumer blasts airlines' proposal to reduce carry-on luggage size (Original Post) cal04 Jun 2015 OP
Classic Sunday Schumer BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #1
Agreed but F*** the airlines for wanting to... Moliere Jun 2015 #2
Fully agree BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #3
My take 1939 Jun 2015 #4
True that but that was before: Moliere Jun 2015 #5
It's in the other two dimensions where the loss is greater and where most bags will fail. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #12
I'd be happy if they just enforced the policies they already have Major Nikon Jun 2015 #6
Often they are oversized too. Owl Jun 2015 #9
In a normal sized carry on I can pack for a two week trip Major Nikon Jun 2015 #13
The problem is not the size restriction but people geek tragedy Jun 2015 #7
Time is money for airlines rickford66 Jun 2015 #8
Last year I bought a new carry on suitcase tammywammy Jun 2015 #10
Shumer going after companies that arnt in NY Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #11

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
1. Classic Sunday Schumer
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:18 AM
Jun 2015

This is how he gets on the local news at least 20-30 Sunday nights a year. They have an info void and he fills it regularly, blasting easy targets and making himself look attentive to constituents in the process. Not my favorite Senator but he is a workhorse.

Moliere

(285 posts)
2. Agreed but F*** the airlines for wanting to...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:17 AM
Jun 2015

...shrink my carry on from 22" to 21.5" and make me buy more luggage. Like that half inch will make a difference except in fees they charge

1939

(1,683 posts)
4. My take
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:20 AM
Jun 2015

Get rid of those damned overhead bins and go back to hat and coat racks up there. Boarding the plane and getting off will be three times faster. Flying was a lot more pleasant back when it was just hat and coat racks.

Moliere

(285 posts)
5. True that but that was before:
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:28 AM
Jun 2015

TSA Searched your bags
TSA Broke you luggage locks
Airports Lost your bags
Airlines charged excessive fees
Airports made you wait an hour to get your bags
Airport handlers throw your bags around and destroy them

And forget it if you want to fly standby when the airlines cancel your flight for no reason

Back airline travel was an experience, now I'd almost rather take Greyhound

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
12. It's in the other two dimensions where the loss is greater and where most bags will fail.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:24 AM
Jun 2015

Standardizing on three maximum dimensions rather than on the old unified inches eliminates most small duffels and and backpacks in favor of framed luggage pieces like rollaboards.

I've always been careful to purchase carry-on bags that are well within the limits and I'd still have trouble with the new standard.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
6. I'd be happy if they just enforced the policies they already have
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:34 AM
Jun 2015

I see people routinely carrying 3 carry ons. They fill up the overhead bins and then the people who get on last have to check their bags.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. The problem is not the size restriction but people
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:36 AM
Jun 2015

over stuffing bags to the point where they won't fit in the bins.

That, and airline greed of course.

rickford66

(5,523 posts)
8. Time is money for airlines
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:49 AM
Jun 2015

Since loading and unloading takes ever longer and airlines are probably losing valuable flight time, there is a simple solution. Baggage should be checked for free as it used to be. Carry on, other than a purse or purse size bag would be charged a fee. Less people struggling with the overheads would be nice. I've been beaned on the head a number of times by dropped or swinging bags. Also there are loading and unloading algorithms which speed up the process IF everyone complies. Like that's going to happen. I think loading from the back to the front and unloading from the front to the back is best. The average time for everyone is the same then. Less bottlenecks for those heading to the rear. Just my two cents. While traveling for work, my bags have never been lost for good, but they were "lost" sometimes for a few days, so I always carried on some essentials. I wouldn't mind paying for the privilege if I had to.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
10. Last year I bought a new carry on suitcase
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:03 AM
Jun 2015

I went with the international sized, which is smaller than what the US carriers allowed. It even fit in the overhead of a regional jet.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
11. Shumer going after companies that arnt in NY
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:14 AM
Jun 2015

When he says something about the banks and hedge funds I'll pay attention.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schumer blasts airlines' ...