Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,992 posts)
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:14 AM Jun 2015

1%-er: "And, no, we’re not all equal when it comes to water.”

Assholes:

RANCHO SANTA FE, CALIF. — Drought or no drought, Steve Yuhas resents the idea that it is somehow shameful to be a water hog. If you can pay for it, he argues, you should get your water.

People “should not be forced to live on property with brown lawns, golf on brown courses or apologize for wanting their gardens to be beautiful,” Yuhas fumed recently on social media. “We pay significant property taxes based on where we live,” he added in an interview. “And, no, we’re not all equal when it comes to water.”

................

“I think we’re being overly penalized, and we’re certainly being overly scrutinized by the world,” said Gay Butler, an interior designer out for a trail ride on her show horse, Bear. She said her water bill averages about $800 a month.


....................

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/rich-californians-youll-have-to-pry-the-hoses-from-our-cold-dead-hands/2015/06/13/fac6f998-0e39-11e5-9726-49d6fa26a8c6_story.html

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1%-er: "And, no, we’re not all equal when it comes to water.” (Original Post) kpete Jun 2015 OP
exponential tiered usage fees based on per person occupancy. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #1
+1 daleanime Jun 2015 #2
That would be quadratic, not exponential. But yes, it should be tiered, agressively phantom power Jun 2015 #3
The exponent I used was 2. ;) nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #7
I think he got that GummyBearz Jun 2015 #13
Toodles Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #17
True as well GummyBearz Jun 2015 #19
Brilliant idea packman Jun 2015 #24
I've heard that about higher fees on traffic violations for the rich in Scandanavia. appalachiablue Jun 2015 #36
I like it! Public shaming (post name and picture in paper for top 25 water hogs each month) too? peacebird Jun 2015 #49
I'd allow something for landscaping XemaSab Jun 2015 #55
Rich people being assholes, but they aren't the big problem phantom power Jun 2015 #4
Ultimately, it's about discouraging population growth in California for the moment. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #37
It really isn't about individual, residential water use. phantom power Jun 2015 #42
Depends on the watershed, too XemaSab Jun 2015 #60
You don't have to power down the economy. You just have to innovate.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #41
Must be nice to have $800/mo just for water. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #5
K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2015 #26
I worked for a woman who lived in a 10,000 square foot house with her husband & little dog. CrispyQ Jun 2015 #31
Welcome to our future. nt RandiFan1290 Jun 2015 #6
"Community" and 'Unity' are not part of their world view, this absence has killed the America HereSince1628 Jun 2015 #8
I blame kpete Jun 2015 #16
Yes probably somewhere in that era from '68-'94 or so, HereSince1628 Jun 2015 #23
Yep. This kind of shit came brazenly out into the open hifiguy Jun 2015 #59
The WITTs vs the YOYOs. CrispyQ Jun 2015 #32
The solution to this is to maroon these pricks in the middle of the desert without water. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #9
Poetic justice GummyBearz Jun 2015 #14
The Socialist solution is to expropriate their property and place it in the service of KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #15
Eventually this will have to be done for survival on this spinning ball of dirt. Wealth will have RKP5637 Jun 2015 #27
I believe you mean "exploitation" of resources... Wounded Bear Jun 2015 #30
Oops!!! Thanks!!! I'll fix it now! RKP5637 Jun 2015 #38
I applaud your vision and may it come to pass sooner rather than later. - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #44
Thanks! I think about this a lot. The numbers just don't make sense to me. We are living RKP5637 Jun 2015 #48
Perhaps you mean physical torture. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #35
My heart weeps for the poor bourgeoisie forced to work for a living. The KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #45
It would make a great TV show. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #51
This is the senario for a family who have to turn to a Food Bank and a charity to turn the water on DhhD Jun 2015 #25
This is how these assholes are about EVERYTHING!!!!! nt valerief Jun 2015 #10
Exactly! We need to move to a society where equal means equal, and wealth will be stopped as RKP5637 Jun 2015 #29
Poor, persecuted 1%-ers Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #11
As is so often the case, Lenin's words are instructive: KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #18
The logic of greed and profit über alles hifiguy Jun 2015 #53
and the other revolutionaries, natch MisterP Jun 2015 #52
It should work exactly the opposite. Starting at the bottom, everyone allowed what the need for brewens Jun 2015 #12
Hey, the people in all the ritzy parts of L.A. had to take it on the chin before. calimary Jun 2015 #28
Don't hold yourself back; tell us how you really feel! Yours from the Santa Barbara coast.... Hekate Jun 2015 #61
"This ship is made of metal...it WILL sink" -the supposed comment by Titanic's architect. Same for FailureToCommunicate Jun 2015 #20
Gay Butler is always causing trouble. valerief Jun 2015 #21
Steve Yuhas = greedy self centered asshole. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #22
When my mother passed I found her ration stamps, from WWII. CrispyQ Jun 2015 #33
Yep. Take Jessica Simpsons' home, for example..... Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #34
If could do my whole yard as pavement, oh boy would I Blue_Adept Jun 2015 #40
It's hard when you have expensive taste LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2015 #39
When Lake Mead drops below the pumping level magical thyme Jun 2015 #43
Stuff like this makes rich people look stupid abelenkpe Jun 2015 #46
There's definite class-based exceptionalism in our society. Oneironaut Jun 2015 #47
I know water's more expensive in SoCal Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #50
CUT THEIR FLOW Skittles Jun 2015 #54
Well lah-dee-dah. What an entitled snot. Hekate Jun 2015 #56
Some people need to be punched. Codeine Jun 2015 #57
That, or have their asses kicked so hard hifiguy Jun 2015 #58

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. exponential tiered usage fees based on per person occupancy.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:21 AM
Jun 2015

You use 5 times as much water as the average household for the number of people living there, you pay 25 times as much for all the water past the average.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
13. I think he got that
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:38 AM
Jun 2015

Exponential functions mean: (any_number)^x. And they grow much faster than x^(any_number)

x^(any_number) is a polynomial function

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
24. Brilliant idea
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:09 AM
Jun 2015

Some European countries - the Nordic ones, I think - use this system in assessing traffic fines. The richer you are, the more you pay for traffic violations.

Sadly, money does not mean that much to the rich. It's about image and GOD FORBID that their lawn is brown.

appalachiablue

(41,132 posts)
36. I've heard that about higher fees on traffic violations for the rich in Scandanavia.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:52 AM
Jun 2015

What a difference from our system where Greed is Good.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
4. Rich people being assholes, but they aren't the big problem
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:59 AM
Jun 2015

80% of the water goes to agriculture, industry and energy. Reducing water use, like reducing energy use, is really about powering down the entire economy.

Food, manufactured goods, energy. Figure out how to do it all with a lot less water, or do less of all of it.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
37. Ultimately, it's about discouraging population growth in California for the moment.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:56 AM
Jun 2015

But we have all kinds of new housing under construction in Southern California.

People need not just water, but the food that requires water to grow. To stay healthy, we have to keep our homes and our bodies reasonably clean. Takes water. Human life takes water. We can cut back on water, but only to a certain point.

Even when it comes to landscaping, we need to keep our trees alive. The grass is not so important, but if you live in a house like ours with lots of windows and no air conditioning in a region 10 area (by gardening regions, that's pretty hot), you need shade from trees,

The gravel on the ground doesn't cool things off quite the way grass does. The best solution is to plant native plants, but even some of those succumb to the heat in the worst of the summer.

It sounds easier to say "reduce water usage" than it is. Most of us in our neighborhood in the city are doing everything we can to cut our water usage. We think about it and talk about it a lot. But we can only cut to a certain point.

I save all the water that I use in the kitchen except the water that has soap. I recycle it into my yard, onto my trees and other plants. That's how we keep things alive.

If you just let your yard go completely to dust, you get dust storms. That's what happened in Oklahoma in the 1930s. That is not an alternative either. It's really bad for your health -- for respiratory diseases for example.

Drought is much more complex than people realize. You have to wash dishes sooner or later.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
42. It really isn't about individual, residential water use.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:04 PM
Jun 2015

If every household in America magically cut their water use by 90%, it would move the overall water-use needle by about... 9%.

The other 90% is agriculture, energy and manufacturing. To cut our country's water use by (for example) 30%, the only way to get there is 25% less agriculture+energy+manufacturing (pick you want to manipulate each to get the final total). That is assuming households managed a 50% reduction in water use.

Understand, I'm totally in favor of not growing grass where grass doesn't grow naturally. But the math says that the total impact of that isn't actually a big part of the overall picture. Those rich people are being assholes, with their giant mansion lawns (and really, fuck them), but they aren't a big part of the problem. There just aren't that many of them.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
60. Depends on the watershed, too
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:45 PM
Jun 2015

There are a lot of basins in California that are lumped together.

A pot plant in Humboldt =/= a rice plant in Glenn =/= an artichoke in Monterey =/= a grape vine in Fresno =/= an avocado tree in Ventura =/= a swimming pool in Palm Springs.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
41. You don't have to power down the economy. You just have to innovate....
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:03 PM
Jun 2015

One obvious way is drip irrigation which saves half of the water or more.

Another is to catch the water used to wash vegetables for market and send it back out to the fields.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
5. Must be nice to have $800/mo just for water.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:02 AM
Jun 2015

I get $968/mo on SS and have ZERO sympathy for her problems.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
31. I worked for a woman who lived in a 10,000 square foot house with her husband & little dog.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:38 AM
Jun 2015

Yep, just the three of them. In the summer of 2003 she told me her air conditioning bill was $700 per month. We had a little sink in the area where we worked. She'd wash her coffee cup & leave the water running while she talked to me. Then she'd use 3 sheets of paper towel to dry her cup. It was an amazing mindset to watch in action, a total lack of awareness of her consumption.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
8. "Community" and 'Unity' are not part of their world view, this absence has killed the America
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:19 AM
Jun 2015

of FDR, Eisenhower, and LBJ.

Without unity and comm-unity we aren't a nation, we're a venue.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
23. Yes probably somewhere in that era from '68-'94 or so,
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:51 AM
Jun 2015

if I were looking to write a book I'd doing a lot of looking at the Thatcher/Reagan era.

If I were looking to change the future, I'd want to be looking into potential motivators of social unification.

Unfortunately, I think we missed a terrific opportunity following the 2008 crash and I'm not expecting or wanting another one of those during the closing years of my life.







CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
32. The WITTs vs the YOYOs.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:43 AM
Jun 2015

We're In This Together vs You're On Your Own.

We've had 30+ years of YOYO policies & a culture that cultivates that kind of thinking. If you were born after 1980, all you've ever heard is that unions are bad & Cadillac queens & their ilk, are the reason for all our problems. Oh, but hey, we're a Christian nation.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
9. The solution to this is to maroon these pricks in the middle of the desert without water.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:23 AM
Jun 2015

And watch as they weaken and go delirious just like anybody else. Juts before they expire, come bring them water and then comment, "oh, it appears we ARE EQUAL when it comes to water".

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
15. The Socialist solution is to expropriate their property and place it in the service of
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:40 AM
Jun 2015

the people. Socialists do not approve of torture, although I appreciate the spirit in which you are offering your post.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
27. Eventually this will have to be done for survival on this spinning ball of dirt. Wealth will have
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:33 AM
Jun 2015

to stop being used as an excuse for exploitation of resources. We are all on one planet and limited resources. Those exploiting the resources, hogging them for their own purposes, will have to be stopped. Those using wealth as an excuse will be seen as moronic and in the way.

Wounded Bear

(58,656 posts)
30. I believe you mean "exploitation" of resources...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:37 AM
Jun 2015

Not...

...to stop being used as an excuse for exploration of resources.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
48. Thanks! I think about this a lot. The numbers just don't make sense to me. We are living
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:31 PM
Jun 2015

with finite resources and space, and the landscape is changing. Those resources thought to be endless for years, forever, are going away.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
35. Perhaps you mean physical torture.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:51 AM
Jun 2015

Depriving the wealthy of their faux stature and toys would be one hell of a mental torture. Not that I'd disapprove of that.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
51. It would make a great TV show.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jun 2015

Miserable lives of the formerly rich and famous. You could show them working nasty jobs as punishment.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
25. This is the senario for a family who have to turn to a Food Bank and a charity to turn the water on
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jun 2015

again in their living area unless they are in even worse shape and are homeless.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
29. Exactly! We need to move to a society where equal means equal, and wealth will be stopped as
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:37 AM
Jun 2015

an excuse for exploitation of resources and others. I don't know how/when this will come about, but it will. We are living in a finite space with finite resources. Individuals such as this will eventually be brought under control for survival of the species.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
18. As is so often the case, Lenin's words are instructive:
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:42 AM
Jun 2015

"The capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them."

brewens

(13,588 posts)
12. It should work exactly the opposite. Starting at the bottom, everyone allowed what the need for
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jun 2015

drinking, cooking, dishes, vegetable gardens and showers. If there isn't enough for your castle grounds, tough shit!

calimary

(81,267 posts)
28. Hey, the people in all the ritzy parts of L.A. had to take it on the chin before.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:33 AM
Jun 2015

Years ago we all had to ration water out here in SoCal. Just like during the 70s we all had to ration gasoline. It's just tough shit. We're all in this together. And SO WHAT if your lawn goes brown? That's "the cost of doing business" here in California DURING A DROUGHT!!!! You are NOT immune!!! That's just part of how it is here in drought country. Get used to it, Rancho Santa Fe! Lawns went brown all over the swanky parts of town, like the Pacific Palisades, parts of Santa Monica, Bel Air, Beverly Hills, Brentwood, all of it. That's just how it was, and how we had to cope.

Btw, Rancho Santa Fe, and La Quinta, and Palm Desert, and Palm Springs - that's another ritzy part of SoCal, but it's been carved OUT OF THE FUCKING DESERT, OKAY?????? The natural order out that way is dry. DRY, DRY, and more DRY. For Pete's Sake, it's the FUCKING DESERT!!!!! It's like building some palace out in the middle of the Sahara and then whining about how you don't have enough water rights. Well, if you choose to live or build or do business out in THE FUCKING DESERT, water issues are going to COME WITH THE TERRITORY!!!!! Get USED TO it. Just like if you choose to live or build or do business up in the Great White North, you're GOING TO have to deal with the cold and the snow, okay????? You're just gonna have to cope with that!!!! It comes with the territory forcryingoutloud!!!!

With rich whiners like this selfish entitled arrogant jerk quoted in the OP, I'd say - hey, YOU are well-heeled enough, YOU have enough money - to be able to pay more. Just like it should be with taxes. YOU are uniquely and comfortably positioned to be able to afford to cough up a little more! OR, you also have enough money to move to a climate where there's plenty of water to have your nice green lawn - that is totally and completely and nothing but ALIEN to a desert climate. I've lived in neighborhoods where everyone MUST have their nice expansive well-kept green lawn (HUGE water guzzler) AND a rose garden out in the front yard (ANOTHER HUGE water guzzler). We gave up on that a long time ago and where we could, we put in drought-tolerant plantings. LOVED my mom's rose garden. I eventually took over the care of it. Worked on it every weekend and took great pride in it. It was beautiful and wonderful and all that. But it was unsustainable. And it was a LOT of work, and by then I had little kids who took up all my extra time, and gardening kinda got shoved to the back burner. So it goes!

INDEED! So it goes! Things change! Sometimes you just have to adapt. This elitist coddled spoiled rich jerk doesn't want to have to adapt. But hey, GET OVER IT, DUDE! We all have to. And today, OUR little drought-tolerant garden is the envy of our neighborhood. You don't have to have a big green lawn and/or a rose garden to have a beautiful front yard or curb appeal. And these days, a drought-tolerant garden has its own distinct and natural beauty. BEAUTY!!! Don't even need flowering plants so much. The colors in the foliage and the stems - like manzanita bushes, for example, with their sumptuous deep-cranberry-red branches and stems - just GLORIOUS! We have all natives and other plantings specifically from this particular area - the kind of thing you'd find growing naturally in the local hillsides and canyons of and around the Santa Monica Mountains.

AND - we're also a habitat now. Maybe some here have gone to the Lounge and checked out my birdie threads.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1018769356

We have hatchlings and birdies and music all around our house from the various bird calls. It's like a symphony outside! And it's TONS of fun! I just posted photos of the first sighting, yesterday, of the new hatchlings - the second bunch of 'em THIS YEAR! We've had nestlings every Spring for three years now, but THIS year we have TWO rounds of 'em. Going natural has its own benefits, FOR SURE!!!!

Hekate

(90,690 posts)
61. Don't hold yourself back; tell us how you really feel! Yours from the Santa Barbara coast....
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:46 PM
Jun 2015

....where the hills are bone dry....

By the way, that great rolling lawn thing is a fetishistic hark-back to country estates in England, where it rains and rains and rains, and the lawn mowers were the landlord's flock of sheep. It's totally unsuitable for anywhere West of the Rockies.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
20. "This ship is made of metal...it WILL sink" -the supposed comment by Titanic's architect. Same for
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:46 AM
Jun 2015

humans, the 1%s or 99ers, without drinkable water they all will perish. It will just take a little longer for the rich.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
33. When my mother passed I found her ration stamps, from WWII.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:46 AM
Jun 2015

She was only a little girl at the time, but every citizen was allotted a ration of food & gas. In today's world, the rationing will be monetary, like this asshole wants. If you have money you will get water. If you don't, you will not.

These people have no understanding of The Commons or the common good. It is all about them.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
34. Yep. Take Jessica Simpsons' home, for example.....
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:48 AM
Jun 2015


Really doing her bit for water conservation, there.
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
43. When Lake Mead drops below the pumping level
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:09 PM
Jun 2015

then the whiners will find out that all the money in the world can't turn the spigot back on for them.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
46. Stuff like this makes rich people look stupid
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:23 PM
Jun 2015

just reinforces the idea that rich people are greedy self centered aholes. If he was smart he'd keep those kind of opinions to himself.

Oneironaut

(5,495 posts)
47. There's definite class-based exceptionalism in our society.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:25 PM
Jun 2015

If you have a certain amount of money, you are allowed to think of yourself as "more of a person" than the common rabble, and therefore deserving of extra privileges. The poor and middle class, in their opinions, are lucky to have a portion of *their* water, because they're all lazy bums who are inferior to them. This is a dangerous mentality that needs to be destroyed from our society.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
50. I know water's more expensive in SoCal
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:09 PM
Jun 2015

But $800 a month?

Living in the Pacific Northwest my water bill is about $10 a month. But then we only have to water or lawns maybe 3 months out of the year at most.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»1%-er: "And, no, we’...