General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am confused
I am channel surfing and FOX said HRC didn't address foreign policy in her speech and some posters here suggested she wants to drop napalm on Vladivostok.
Can someone please help me erase my confusion.
Thank you in advance.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)that is all that needs to be said about that.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Somebody started a threat that suggested Hillary advocated slaughter and the poster included this iconic photo:
awake
(3,226 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)she is a warmonger, wants to start wars, will continue Bush policies etc...etc...etc... They were so amusing, especially since protecting the country is the absolute first job of any President. Don't be confused though. When you have half of DU believing in "trickle down" justice, you have to understand those types of threads for what they really are.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When I realized the hate that some posters here have for Democrats especially iconic ones like the martyred John Kennedy the hate they have for Hillary made an odd kind of sense.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I think if you take a look at some of far left policies and the tea party, you will find them similar.
cali
(114,904 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)She addressed it with some unremarkable boilerplate that just about any major party candidate in any era would have used and some posters inferred or implied she advocated "slaughter"....
Like I said it all made sense when a poster in that thread suggested PT 109 was sunk because JFK was drunk...
Iggo
(47,553 posts)Keep watching fox.