Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Sunday Times Snowden story increasingly seems like a big steaming pile......
.....(snip).....
On Thursday, David Anderson, the governments reviewer of terrorism legislation, condemned snooping laws as undemocratic, unnecessary and in the long run intolerable, and called for a comprehensive new law incorporating judicial warrants something for which my organisation, Liberty, has campaigned for many years. This thoughtful intervention brought new hope to us and others, for the rebuilding of public trust in surveillance conducted with respect for privacy, democracy and the law. And it was only possible thanks to Edward Snowden. Rumblings from No 10 immediately betrayed they were less than happy with many of Andersons recommendations particularly his call for judicial oversight. And three days later, the empire strikes back! An exclusive story in the Sunday Times saying that MI6 is believed to have pulled out spies because Russia and China decoded Snowdens files. The NSA whistleblower is now a man with blood on his hands according to one anonymous senior Home Office official.
Low on facts, high on assertions, this flimsy but impeccably timed story gives us a clear idea of where government spin will go in the coming weeks. It uses scare tactics to steer the debate away from Andersons considered recommendations and starts setting the stage for the home secretarys new investigatory powers bill. In his report, Anderson clearly states no operational case had yet been made for the snoopers charter. So it is easy to see why the government isnt keen on people paying too close attention to it. ...............(more)
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/14/edward-snowden-hero-government-scare-tactics
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1187 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (43)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Sunday Times Snowden story increasingly seems like a big steaming pile...... (Original Post)
marmar
Jun 2015
OP
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. They did the same thing to Smedley Butler .
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)2. That the government would fear judicial oversight on these issues is why judicial oversight was put in the Constitution.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)4. Yes, but what's your point? nm
Wilms
(26,795 posts)3. From minute one. n/t
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)5. does "to make an omelet...."
have an application here?
and who's responsible for those losses if they occur?
This is similar to but not to be confused with some of the BS rightwingers are spewing over the police abuses.
and the price of inaction in both cases exceeds that of any actions taken as remedies
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)6. The information relating to Snowden is
top secret and not for consumption by the public. That they leaked it demonstrates there is something else on the government's agenda.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)7. Dicrediting anyone who exposes them, and MSM helps .
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)8. of course!