General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary: capitalist or socialist?
The family does seem to have a lot of capital stored away.
Is a capitalist what we need as president? Or are we better off with a socialist?
Marr
(20,317 posts)Or anyone who is even on the side of the 99% where it concerns money, for that matter.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The truth and nothing but.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Wall Street is capitalist not socialists
zappaman
(20,606 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)nt
cali
(114,904 posts)PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Who the hell thinks she's a socialist?
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)about those less fortunate, i.e., the kennedy's.
that being said bernie is my choice. i think hillary is an opportunist.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)A product of a blended capitalist / socialist system.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)and as for candidates:
FDR
JFK
DON't recall anyone compaining
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I think Hillary is to far to one side. Bernie is closer to striking the right balance (IMO).
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)NewSystemNeeded
(111 posts)Too bad Harvard and Yale didn't produce more like him.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Omnith
(171 posts)We would not be better off with a socialist. It seems many do not know what an actual socialist is and need to reacquaint themselves.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)What is an "actual socialist"?
In my mind we have many capitalists in government and they have made a mess of things.
TBF
(32,062 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Crony capitalist. Thanks, Cheese.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm convinced that Hillary can be whatever the particular situation demands she be in order to maximize benefit to Hillary.