General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat do you think now, Justice Scalia?
Charleston Gazette
Leonard Pitts Jr.: What do you think now, Justice Scalia?
To the Honorable Antonin G. Scalia, associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States:
Dear Sir:
Twenty-one years ago, your then-colleague, the late Justice Harry Blackmun, wrote what became a famous dissent to a Supreme Court decision not to review a Texas death penalty conviction. In it, Blackmun declared that he had become convinced the death penalty experiment has failed and said he considered capital punishment irretrievably unconstitutional.
The death penalty, he wrote, remains fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination ... and mistake. From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.
You mocked him for this stance in an opinion concurring with the majority, invoking as justification for capital punishment the horrific 1983 case of an 11-year-old girl who was raped then killed by having her panties stuffed down her throat. How enviable a quiet death by lethal injection, you wrote, compared with that!
A few months later, the very case you had referenced came before the court. Henry Lee McCollum, a mentally-disabled man who was on death row in North Carolina after having been convicted of that rape and murder, applied to the court for a review of his case. You were part of the majority that rejected the request without comment.
More
http://www.wvgazette.com/article/20150615/GZ04/150619623/1453
Remainder details exocution of man later proven innocent. It is worth the read, even if, as I, you are not exactly opposed to capital punishment but see many flaws in its practice.
ProfessorGAC
(65,228 posts). . ."Whatcha gonna do?"
marym625
(17,997 posts)I think Scalia doesn't give a shit. He's just that cold
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)that we've 'never executed a guilty person'. I heard one of them on a talk show just a few weeks ago using that line.
cheyanne
(733 posts)In this article at First Things, Scalia explains that, since the state is exercising God's punishments, and since God has nowhere refuted using death as a punishment, he has no problem voting for capital punishment. This scenario is, of course, for Scalia eternal and not subject to changing societal mores.
"I pause here to emphasize the point that in my view the choice for the judge who believes the death penalty to be immoral is resignation, rather than simply ignoring duly enacted, constitutional laws and sabotaging death penalty cases. He has, after all, taken an oath to apply the laws and has been given no power to supplant them with rules of his own."
Once he has the word of God . . .what horrors a man will commit.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)His legal opinions is completely outcome-based, despite his sanctimonious claims to the contrary.