General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Rejects North Carolina’s Appeal on Pre-Abortion Ultrasounds/NYT
Yay! Good news for a change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/us/politics/supreme-court-rejects-north-carolinas-appeal-on-pre-abortion-ultrasounds.html?_r=0
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from North Carolina officials seeking to revive a state law that had required doctors to perform ultrasounds, display the resulting sonograms and describe the fetuses to women seeking abortions.
The Supreme Courts one-sentence order, as is the custom, gave no reasons. Justice Antonin Scalia noted a dissent, also without saying why.
The order left in place an appeals court ruling that had held the law unconstitutional as a violation of the First Amendment.
The state cannot commandeer the doctor-patient relationship to compel a physician to express its preference to the patient, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III wrote in December for a unanimous three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va. This compelled speech, even though it is a regulation of the medical profession, is ideological in intent and in kind.
Other federal appeals courts upheld similar laws from Texas and South Dakota. Such disagreements among appeals courts often lead to Supreme Court review.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)a religious mandate, identical to the mandates of Sharia Law.
The flawless logic of this court decision can only be denied by religious fervor that rejects impeccable logic in favor of blind faith.
staggerleem
(469 posts)Love it! GONNA steal it, too!
And, hey, I was listening to Blind Faith this weekend - Helluva good band, y'know?
Raster
(20,998 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)Religious dogma IS ideological. It's just a type of ideology. Any ideology that places its dogma as a higher value than valuing humans is immoral. And no, embryos are not yet humans. Woman, in consultation with their physicians, have the right to make their own reproductive decisions.
Care to guess who the dissenters were?
MineralMan
(146,336 posts)A victory for reproductive choice.
lark
(23,163 posts)The wonder is that his twin, Thomas, didn't join in. Must be on vacation?
mythology
(9,527 posts)progressoid
(49,999 posts)They must not mind burning in hell.
Prism
(5,815 posts)I was hoping the ruling would take out the laws in places like Wisconsin and Texas as well. I'd like to see the Court smack down all this burdensome requirement shit nationwide.
But, progress is progress.
eggplant
(3,914 posts)dragonlady
(3,577 posts)It's just a procedural action and expresses no opinion on the merits of the case. The Supreme Court takes only about 1% of the cases appealed to it.