General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse panel approves $30.17B bill cutting EPA funds, blocking rules
Another day, another outrage...
House panel approves $30.17B bill cutting EPA funds, blocking rules
By Devin Henry - 06/16/15 01:37 PM EDT
The House Appropriations committee approved a $30.17 billion Interior and Environment spending bill on Tuesday that cuts Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) funding by 9 percent and blocks key Obama administration climate rules.
Lawmakers approved the bill on a mostly partyline vote, and much of the debate centered on measures in the bill targeting EPA policies. Republicans said the measures are necessary to rein in what committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) called an unnecessary, job-killing regulatory agenda.
This administration has been hell-bent on implementing all sorts of regulations that are harmful to both our economy and our energy security, Rogers said. Bill-wide, we have included several important policy provisions aimed to stop this sort of overzealous bureaucratic red tape.
Democrats slammed the bill for both the EPA funding levels it cuts the agencys funding by $718 million and provisions blocking its rule-making, including a water oversight rule and forthcoming greenhouse gas regulations for power plants.
Republicans also approved an amendment to the bill Tuesday stopping an upcoming EPA smog rule. They also approved a provision blocking funding for a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rule regulating hydraulic fracturing on federal lands.
The air every American breaths, the water every American drinks, are all at risk because of the funding cuts and policy attacks in this bill, said Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations interior and environment subcommittee.
more...
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/245137-house-panel-approves-3017b-bill-to-cut-epa-funds-block-climate
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Let's bury this in A45........
spanone
(135,832 posts)the media isn't interested in substance.