Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:12 PM Jun 2015

Faux news freaks out: "Pope Francis is THE MOST DANGEROUS person on the planet!"

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/06/fox-host-freaks-out-over-marxist-pope-francis-he-is-the-most-dangerous-person-on-the-planet/

Fox News personality Greg Gutfeld accused Pope Francis of being “the most dangerous person on the planet” because he is seeking “strange new respect” from adversaries on climate change.

On Tuesday night’s episode of The Five, the panel discussed the pontiff’s leaked encyclical that warns of “unprecedented destruction of the ecosystem” unless drastic changes to lifestyle and energy consumption are made globally. Gutfeld accused the pope of having a “Marxist” background and Malthusian belief system.

“And that is what the Pope is doing. He doesn’t want to be your grandfather’s pope. He wants to be a modern pope. All he needs is dreadlocks and a dog with a bandanna and he could be on Occupy Wall Street,” Gutfeld ranted, in a video clip procured by Media Matters.

In a conspiratorial-sounding diatribe, Gutfeld implied there was a link between the Pope’s supposed Malthusian belief in a looming overpopulation-related global catastrophe and climate change.

“He is a Malthusian. He is in bed with Malthus. He believes that the Earth is overpopulated… and remember he said Catholics have to stop breeding like rabbits? Do you remember where that came from? That’s a Malthusian belief. And Malthusians believe that the Earth is overpopulated and it would be nice if there were a few billion people less. How does that happen? Global warming.”

SNIP
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Faux news freaks out: "Pope Francis is THE MOST DANGEROUS person on the planet!" (Original Post) pnwmom Jun 2015 OP
I am loving this Pope! DCBob Jun 2015 #1
RW Catholics are a tiny fraction of American Catholics. onehandle Jun 2015 #2
That may have been true in the past but not anymore.. DCBob Jun 2015 #11
That would depend entirely on how they defined "Catholic." pnwmom Jun 2015 #16
I am sure its self defined. DCBob Jun 2015 #17
Sometimes they first separate Church goers from non-Church goers pnwmom Jun 2015 #18
Look at that curve for "White Catholic".... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #19
curious. DCBob Jun 2015 #20
He's still got some major problems Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #3
Yep. He has quite a quite a way to go hifiguy Jun 2015 #8
Given the situation he has made amazing changes to the Church already in a very short period. DCBob Jun 2015 #14
He is, personally, a bigot. He was before he became pope, and he still is. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #23
Right. Which is why he said, "Who am I to judge?" pnwmom Jun 2015 #25
He is the pope. Yesterday he judged same sex couples to be inferior parents. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #27
It's not going to matter much whether we're straight or gay once the planet is unlivable. pnwmom Jun 2015 #28
I'm glad he spoke up on Cuba. Doesn't change that he's a bigot. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #33
I don't get the last claim. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #4
You're trying to apply thought and reason to something they said on FOX. arcane1 Jun 2015 #6
can't be done hollysmom Jun 2015 #15
well greg, he is infallible spanone Jun 2015 #5
Gutfield wants Pope Rat to return... Archae Jun 2015 #7
Ratzinger said the same shit about poverty and the environment. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #24
O'Really? and Insannity could not be reached for comment. KamaAina Jun 2015 #9
Megyn Kelly agreed that he was "not exactly a saint." pnwmom Jun 2015 #10
Bazinga! pinboy3niner Jun 2015 #13
He's got big oil all worried, if that comment reflected internal feeling from FOX, which it must. Gregorian Jun 2015 #12
looks like some little news boy had a post about Malthus read to him last week rurallib Jun 2015 #21
Islamo-Catho-Judeo-scientifi-Commie conspiracy! MisterP Jun 2015 #22
lololololololololol MFM008 Jun 2015 #26
Maybe not the most dangerous, but still pretty awful (nt) bigwillq Jun 2015 #29
Yeah, it's pretty awful to warn the world about global environmental catastrophe. nt pnwmom Jun 2015 #31
cognitive dissonance for the far religious right: salin Jun 2015 #30
I can't help it, I love what's happening here damnedifIknow Jun 2015 #32

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. RW Catholics are a tiny fraction of American Catholics.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:17 PM
Jun 2015

But shout loudly.

Glad to hear my Pope is freaking them out.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
11. That may have been true in the past but not anymore..
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jun 2015

"While Catholics have been swing voters since Richard Nixon’s second term, white Catholics are now identifying as Republican by historic margins. According to the most recent polling from the Pew Research Center, 53 percent of white Catholics now favor the GOP, versus 39 percent who favor the Democrats—the largest point spread in the history of the Pew poll. And for the first time, white Catholics are more Republican than the voting group usually considered the ultimate Republicans: white Protestants (a designation that includes both mainline and evangelical Protestants)."



http://www.salon.com/2015/03/15/the_democratic_party_is_facing_a_catholic_apocalypse/

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
16. That would depend entirely on how they defined "Catholic."
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jun 2015

The number who identify as Catholic is far higher than the number who turn up in the pews each Sunday -- and far more Democratic.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
18. Sometimes they first separate Church goers from non-Church goers
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jun 2015

and ask the regular Church goers what their affiliation is.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
19. Look at that curve for "White Catholic"....
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 08:41 PM
Jun 2015

Vote D under Clinton, vote R under Dubya (until the war is proven a lie) and then vote sharply R as soon as Obama won.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. He's still got some major problems
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:18 PM
Jun 2015

with gays and women in general, but on climate change and poverty, he's light years ahead of prior Popes.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
8. Yep. He has quite a quite a way to go
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:23 PM
Jun 2015

but he is headed in the right direction on some big issues. And none are bigger than the future habitability of the only planet we have. None.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
14. Given the situation he has made amazing changes to the Church already in a very short period.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:31 PM
Jun 2015

Who knows what more he can accomplish.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
23. He is, personally, a bigot. He was before he became pope, and he still is.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 09:46 PM
Jun 2015

It's not an act or a thing he puts up with for the church's sake. He is a homophobe to the max. He spent this morning calling out gender roles in parentage, singling out same sex parents, which is a continuation of his 'same sex parents adopting children is discrimination against the child' schtick. He also spent a little time crapping on single parents, but his primary goal was to say vile shit about gay people.

He's not going to lead change for the church on this because he himself holds to regressive doctrine.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
25. Right. Which is why he said, "Who am I to judge?"
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 09:59 PM
Jun 2015


He can't undo 2000 years of Church history and precedent in two years.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
27. He is the pope. Yesterday he judged same sex couples to be inferior parents.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:09 PM
Jun 2015
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7597040

Do try to keep up with current events.

He is a spectacular bigot with the ears of some 1.3bn Catholics worldwide. He's not even trying to change the church on this.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
28. It's not going to matter much whether we're straight or gay once the planet is unlivable.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:19 PM
Jun 2015

Whatever his other flaws, I'm glad he's speaking up strongly for the environment.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
4. I don't get the last claim.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:19 PM
Jun 2015

Wouldn't global warming mean less people? And if the pope wanted less people wouldn't he do nothing on global warming? Maybe my problem is trying to understand the foxian mind.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
24. Ratzinger said the same shit about poverty and the environment.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 09:47 PM
Jun 2015

Blank frank is just better at the pr thing.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
12. He's got big oil all worried, if that comment reflected internal feeling from FOX, which it must.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:29 PM
Jun 2015

As if Malthus were wrong. And the earth is flat.

I don't believe what I'm hearing from pope Francis. But go for it, man. I love it.

salin

(48,955 posts)
30. cognitive dissonance for the far religious right:
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:23 PM
Jun 2015

Pope infallibility (per he hears from God)

vs.

Innerrancy of the Bible (people writing sections heard from God)

For the past couple of decades (post Kennedy) far right Catholics (with some Bishops very vocal) joined with far right evangelicals on an increasingly political agenda. Now the Catholics (esp those high up Bishops) have their loyalties tested: is the Pope infallible - and if not - how are any of your preachings more infallible than his? And then what is the point of the Papacy?

For Evangelicals - if Catholics who are more politically than religiously aligned - go against their faith leader (infallibility), do you have to fall in line on every issue with your leaders on political lines - per inerrancy (literal readings of the bible) ... or *gasp* are there different ways of reading the same passages in the bible (and if so - how do you tell what is the right per what interpretation gets the inerrancy correct?)

Not Catholic.. but "Go Pope Frances, Go!)

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
32. I can't help it, I love what's happening here
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:38 PM
Jun 2015

Pope Francis said Monday that "many powerful people don't want peace because they live off war". The Argentine pontiff made the hard-hitting comment in response to a question from one of the 7,000 children taking part in an audience held with the Peace Factory organisation. "This is serious," Francis told the children.

"Some powerful people make their living with the production of arms.

"It's the industry of death".

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/11/1384007/-Pope-Francis-Many-powerful-people-don-t-want-peace-because-they-live-off-war




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Faux news freaks out: &qu...