General Discussion

question everything

(47,509 posts) Thu Jun 18, 2015, 09:54 PM Jun 2015

Dylann Roof (the church shooter) wants "our country back"

Hmm... wonder where he has heard it before. Wonder where we have been hearing this before.

Hint, the hosts of the Fox programs.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dylann Roof (the church shooter) wants "our country back" (Original Post) question everything Jun 2015 OP

That was a Tea Party thing gollygee Jun 2015 #1

I've always thought so too. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2015 #4

Although it was originally said in a much more hopeful tone ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #6

It's code for 1950s white dominated America. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #7

Hey I want it back too - from THEM nt LiberalElite Jun 2015 #2

Take a number. calimary Jun 2015 #3

Well, you can't have my country, you hateful racist fucks. Iggo Jun 2015 #5

gollygee

(22,336 posts)

1. That was a Tea Party thing

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 09:55 PM

Jun 2015

I have said and I'll say again that the Tea Party is just the KKK rebranded.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)

4. I've always thought so too. n/t

Reply to gollygee (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:02 PM

Jun 2015

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)

6. Although it was originally said in a much more hopeful tone

Reply to gollygee (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:17 PM

Jun 2015

by the Good Dr. Dean.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)

7. It's code for 1950s white dominated America.

Reply to gollygee (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:17 PM

Jun 2015

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)

2. Hey I want it back too - from THEM nt

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 09:57 PM

Jun 2015

calimary

(81,377 posts)

3. Take a number.

Reply to LiberalElite (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 09:58 PM

Jun 2015

Iggo

(47,561 posts)

5. Well, you can't have my country, you hateful racist fucks.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:15 PM

Jun 2015

:middlefinger: :middlefinger:

Reply to this discussion