Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 11:04 PM Jun 2015

Why Are Media Organizations So Reluctant to Call Dylann Roof a Terrorist?

So far, we know that Dylan Roof, a 21-year-old white man, is in custody in connection with the shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, in Charleston, S.C., where nine people were killed. Images of Roof circulating on social media show him wearing a black jacket bearing the flags of apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia, both known for their histories of state-sanctioned racism and terror against black majorities.

The Daily Beast reports that a high school classmate of Roof’s said he “made a lot of racist jokes.” Sylvia Johnson, cousin of the pastor of Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal (who was one of the dead), says a survivor told her Roof said, "You rape our women and you’re taking over the country. You have to go."

For many black people, it is clear that Roof’s alleged actions are an act of terror, making him a “terror suspect,” not a “shooting suspect.” But so far most media outlets have referred to Roof as the latter.

Anthea Butler, associate professor of religion and Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania wrote for the Washington Post, media outlets have already found ways to legitimize his alleged crimes, a courtesy that is seldom extended to suspects of color.


THE REST: http://www.alternet.org/media/why-are-media-organizations-so-reluctant-call-dylann-roof-terrorist
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Are Media Organizations So Reluctant to Call Dylann Roof a Terrorist? (Original Post) Triana Jun 2015 OP
Totally wrong on my part, yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #1
No bombs on 9/11 jberryhill Jun 2015 #3
Great points and that is one of array of reasons I love it here yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #4
Terrorism jberryhill Jun 2015 #6
You beat me to it (Munich). those guys were quite clearly terrorists. kath Jun 2015 #5
Yes, he had a drug problem, rocktivity Jun 2015 #2
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Totally wrong on my part,
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 11:09 PM
Jun 2015

But I think of a terrorist as someone who uses a bomb to kill people. I never equate guns with terrorism. Perhaps as the focus is explained I can get on board with this too.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
4. Great points and that is one of array of reasons I love it here
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 11:25 PM
Jun 2015

So many of my beliefs have been regurgitated from a variety of sources and quite frankly many have been wrong. Of course I am a liberal on the big ticket items, but some of the things I think about like details of race, environment, policing and other issues I do not have an indept knowledge of things and I am not particularly an intellect with thinking at all. So being on DU has given me such an education and the collective has shown me a great deal in my deficits in many areas that I am slowly improving my overall knowledge which is so gratifying to me. This place to me is priceless.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. Terrorism
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 12:13 AM
Jun 2015

Is generally the use of violence against a civilian target for political purposes by a non-state actor.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
2. Yes, he had a drug problem,
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 11:11 PM
Jun 2015

which should have been more than enough reason for his own father NOT to give him a gun. But there is now no denying that he clearly also had a political agenda.

The Boston Marathon bomber wasn't coddled like this.


rocktivity

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Are Media Organizatio...