General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom Scalia's dissent: "We should start calling this law SCOTUScare."
As posted via http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/06/live-blog-of-opinions-june-25-2015/
Poor Scalia. So much anger and hate. And he wants it to lead to much suffering for others.
Bernie 2016
(90 posts)He's been warming that seat for way too long. Time for him to go, and take Uncle Tom with him.
brush
(53,871 posts)". . . and take Uncle Tom with him."
I love it.
And welcome to DU.
BeyondGeography
(39,379 posts)Imagine that? Appalling.
3catwoman3
(24,046 posts)His heart attack is overdue.
catbyte
(34,451 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)alterfurz
(2,474 posts)...aka/dba SCROTUS: Supreme Court Republicans of the U.S.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I'm very happy that Roberts seems to be a sane, rational and unbiased justice. I guess we can thank the dimwit for one thing.
unblock
(52,321 posts)roberts has been on our side on the aca, but remember that the aca was always the market-based, conservative alternative (proposed by the heritage foundation) to more liberal healthcare reforms (single-payer, e.g.)
i'd simply say that his bias has been more "right-wing/conservative" than "republican".
forgive me if i don't celebrate this distinction.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)And of course I wish a liberal justice were in his place. But, at least in terms of health care, he has proved his trustworthiness.
unblock
(52,321 posts)then again, i suppose it's progress that there were only 3 dissenting votes instead of 4....
seriously, at best this case was about trying to bring down an entire huge federal program on the basis of what was at worst a tiny drafting error. reasonable justices don't seize upon a drafting error and finalize their opinion then and there on that basis. in fact, it reduces legal analysis to a computer program that just crashes when the program isn't perfect.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)Iggo
(47,565 posts)I really can't stand that hateful prick.
Can you tell?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)He's losing it.
Paladin
(28,272 posts)As if any further proof were needed.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,339 posts)It sounds like it could be written by Rush Limballs.
Spazito
(50,454 posts)samsingh
(17,601 posts)they are the true definition of judicial activism - making laws fit what they want them to do, rather that what they way or the intent.
bad for democracy.
samsingh
(17,601 posts)reveal that they are not being objective and that this is a personal crusade. Nothing about justice.
and they know they are untouchable and so can act like tyrants.
they are a big disgusting joke on us all.
herding cats
(19,567 posts)History will not treat him kindly for his decision. He's created quite the legacy for himself and he deserves the future generations of scorn that's going to be heaped on his head.
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)with how Scalia is actually thought of. I'd really like to know what his legacy will be.