Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:54 PM Jun 2015

The Obamacare ruling is an even bigger victory for the law—and the president—than anybody expected

By Mark Joseph Stern

Everybody,

To my mind, the most astonishing aspect of Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion in King v. Burwell is that it actually puts Obamacare’s opponents in a worse position than they were in before the lawsuit. Pre-King, the IRS had simply promulgated a rule that subsidies must be available to people in every state, regardless of the presence of an exchange. The Obama administration argued that, if the court found the text ambiguous, it should defer to the IRS and allow its rule to go forward. (This is the so-called Chevron deference.) Under that logic, a future administration could revoke the subsidies in states with no exchange just as easily as the Obama administration made the subsidies universally available.

But on Thursday, Roberts held that the Chevron deference doesn’t apply. The subsidy question, he explains, is one of deep “economic and political significance” that cuts to the core of the law. Thus, “[t]his is not a case for the IRS. It is instead our task to determine the correct reading of” the disputed section. Roberts then writes that “Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them,” so the court must hold that the “correct reading” of the law required subsidies to be made available in all 50 states.

This is a breathtaking holding—and an absolutely devastating defeat for the conservatives who brought this challenge to Obamacare. What might have been an ambiguous portion of the text—and an opportunity for a future president to wreck the law—has now been made unambiguous by the court.

No wonder, then, that Justice Antonin Scalia was hopping mad, writing in his dissent that the majority’s logic is “[p]ure applesauce” and “interpretive jiggery-pokery.” The court didn’t just save Obamacare from this challenge; it also saved it from potential future sabotage. The court’s hardcore conservatives may be furious—but the president has a lot of celebrating to do.

more
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2015/scotus_roundup/supreme_court_2015_the_obamacare_ruling_is_a_bigger_victory_than_anyone.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Obamacare ruling is an even bigger victory for the law—and the president—than anybody expected (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2015 OP
SCOTUScare! yallerdawg Jun 2015 #1
Wish that could happen. He is an embarassment to the human race. mmonk Jun 2015 #3
And we are talking about him resigning from it aren't we? rock Jun 2015 #6
Both. nt SunSeeker Jun 2015 #7
! rock Jun 2015 #10
Hahahahahaha! shenmue Jun 2015 #2
Wow, very interesting! Spazito Jun 2015 #4
Oh, the delectable, ironic schadenfreude! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #9
Don't forget the insurance companies and their stockholders as well! United HC stock up 400%.. MadDAsHell Jun 2015 #5
Thanks for playing, GOP. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #8
Response from Physicians for a National Health Program pberq Jun 2015 #11
Vote democratic, at federal and state levels! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2015 #12

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
1. SCOTUScare!
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:58 PM
Jun 2015

The ultimate irony, Scalia!

Can't wait until his court legalizes same-sex marriage everywhere!

He could always resign, couldn't he?



Spazito

(50,453 posts)
4. Wow, very interesting!
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:07 PM
Jun 2015

The ruling has enshrined what might have been reversed by a future President had the challenge not going forward.

Republicans hoisted on their own petard X 10, LOVE it!

Thanks for posting this.

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
5. Don't forget the insurance companies and their stockholders as well! United HC stock up 400%..
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:12 PM
Jun 2015

since the law's inception.

pberq

(2,950 posts)
11. Response from Physicians for a National Health Program
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 10:27 AM
Jun 2015
‘Subsidies upheld, but health needs still unmet’: doctors group

Although the Supreme Court has upheld the premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, the law remains incapable of remedying the U.S. health crisis, physician group says

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 25, 2015


Physicians for a National Health Program, an organization of 19,000 doctors who support single-payer national health insurance, released the following statement today:

Today’s decision by the Supreme Court in King v. Burwell to uphold the Affordable Care Act’s premium subsidies in about three dozen states will spare more than 6 million Americans the health and financial harms associated with the sudden loss of health insurance coverage.

For that reason alone the decision must be welcomed: Having health insurance is better than not having coverage, as several research studies have shown.

That said, the suffering that many Americans are experiencing today under our current health care arrangements is intolerable, with approximately 35 million people remaining uninsured, a comparable number underinsured, and rapidly growing barriers to medical care in the form of rising premiums, copayments, coinsurance and deductibles, and narrowing networks. . .

(more at link)

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
12. Vote democratic, at federal and state levels!
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 10:40 AM
Jun 2015

because incredibly complex problems can never be solved in one attack.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Obamacare ruling is a...