Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJindal being pwned by 21-year-old son of old friend
This is hysterical:
Mother Jones has a fun piece on 21-year-old Zack Kopplin. He's a senior at Rice University. Mr. Kopplin is also one of the more visible and vocal opponents of anti-science sentiments in Louisiana legislature. This has brought him into direct opposition with desperately ambitious hypocrite Governor Bobby Jindal.
The image of Jindal as an anti-science hypocrite is largely the product of one manZack Kopplin, a 21-year-old history major at Rice University. Kopplin has spent much of the last five years campaigning against Jindal's approach to the teaching of evolution, which Kopplin considers a back-door invitation to teach creationism. He's testified before the state legislature and has made appearances on Hardball, NPR, and Real Time With Bill Maher (alongside Bernie Sanders).
The great poetry of this all is that Zack Kopplin is the son of one of Bobby Jindal's earliest friends in governmentAndy Kopplin. The two, young men at the time, were protegés to Republican Governor Murphy Foster. According to Zack, the Jindals and Kopplins dinnered together quite a bityoung coupled-up friends. This is how young Zack knew Governor Jindal up until the late 2000s:
The turning point for Kopplin came in 2008, when the state legislature passed the Louisiana Science Education Act, which purported to "help students understand, analyze, critique and review scientific theories." But the subtext seemed clear. The bill, which Jindal signed into law, opened a potential backdoor to the teaching of intelligent design by allowing teachers to introduce supplementary materials that hadn't been approved by the state department of education. The law was written by a social conservative organization called the Louisiana Family Forum, in consultation with the Discovery Institute, a pro-intelligent-design think tank. The Democratic state senator who introduced the bill explained at the time that its supporters believed that "scientific data related to creationism should be discussed when dealing with Darwin's theory." Kopplin decided to devote his senior year of high school in Baton Rouge to fighting the new law. He started a petition and got 75 Nobel laureates to sign it. Even Jindal's college genetics teacher was on board.
The image of Jindal as an anti-science hypocrite is largely the product of one manZack Kopplin, a 21-year-old history major at Rice University. Kopplin has spent much of the last five years campaigning against Jindal's approach to the teaching of evolution, which Kopplin considers a back-door invitation to teach creationism. He's testified before the state legislature and has made appearances on Hardball, NPR, and Real Time With Bill Maher (alongside Bernie Sanders).
The great poetry of this all is that Zack Kopplin is the son of one of Bobby Jindal's earliest friends in governmentAndy Kopplin. The two, young men at the time, were protegés to Republican Governor Murphy Foster. According to Zack, the Jindals and Kopplins dinnered together quite a bityoung coupled-up friends. This is how young Zack knew Governor Jindal up until the late 2000s:
The turning point for Kopplin came in 2008, when the state legislature passed the Louisiana Science Education Act, which purported to "help students understand, analyze, critique and review scientific theories." But the subtext seemed clear. The bill, which Jindal signed into law, opened a potential backdoor to the teaching of intelligent design by allowing teachers to introduce supplementary materials that hadn't been approved by the state department of education. The law was written by a social conservative organization called the Louisiana Family Forum, in consultation with the Discovery Institute, a pro-intelligent-design think tank. The Democratic state senator who introduced the bill explained at the time that its supporters believed that "scientific data related to creationism should be discussed when dealing with Darwin's theory." Kopplin decided to devote his senior year of high school in Baton Rouge to fighting the new law. He started a petition and got 75 Nobel laureates to sign it. Even Jindal's college genetics teacher was on board.
More hilarity ensues at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/24/1396124/-Bobby-Jindal-is-being-exposed-by-his-old-friend-s-21-year-old-son-over-and-over-and-over-again?detail=email
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 724 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jindal being pwned by 21-year-old son of old friend (Original Post)
hifiguy
Jun 2015
OP
ID should be discussed in the science classroom, as to why it is such a laughably wrong hypothesis.
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#2
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. Bobby is a Rhodes Scholar
One wonders if that means anything
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)3. Young Mr Kopplin apparently believes that Jindal
doesn't believe a single word he says about this crap.
He goes on in the Kos article to note that he went to high school with one of Jindal's kids, where their biology teacher was "fanatacal" about teaching the truth of evolution. Apparently Piyush had no problems with that.
A lying, pandering shit he is.
I've known a couple of Rhodes Scholars. Stupid they are not, and Jindal knows better, but sounding stupid helped him get elected.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)2. ID should be discussed in the science classroom, as to why it is such a laughably wrong hypothesis.