Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:21 AM Jun 2015

"Jiggery Pokery", Scalia, and the George Will School of Pedantic Rhetoric.

Scalia is a smart and educated guy so one can't just dismiss him as ignorant. However he has the unfortunate flaw common to many bright people - he thinks he is the smartest guy in the room. And he may be. But even the smartest guy in the room can be lacking in wisdom. And Scalia is. It just doesn't occur to him that there are different ways of being smart, that sometimes even the smartest guy in the room can learn from others, maybe even others who don't appear to have the same level of intellect or education. And this causes frustration. Others are "fools" and he does not suffer fools gladly. But instead of being introspective about this and maybe learning something, Scalia falls into what I call the "George Will School of Pedantic Rhetoric." George Will also thinks he is the smartest guy in the room. But he lacks some confidence about it. So to convince himself and others that he really is the smartest guy in the room he is fond of using obscure words which the general audience will not recognize when an everyday word would work just as well. (I have always suspected that Will combs the thesaurus just trying to find juicy and complicated obscure words to use in his columns. But I cannot prove it. Maybe he is just a word nerd). But back to Scalia. Scalia could just as well have said "dishonest argument." That is what jiggery pokery means. By using the more exotic term, it makes him look smart and well educated and his readers not so much because they likely have to look up the term. The ironic thing is that in this case Roberts quite effectively used Scalia's own arguments from a previous case in making the case for upholding Obama's interpretation of the ACA. This really had to piss off Scalia and the result was "jiggery pokery." But Scalia was also calling his own arguments from a previous case "jiggery pokery." So a big fat middle finger salute to you, Mr. Scalia.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Jiggery Pokery", Scalia, and the George Will School of Pedantic Rhetoric. (Original Post) yellowcanine Jun 2015 OP
When I first saw that phrase, I thought he just made it up. procon Jun 2015 #1
One smart guy, and he felt smart! rock Jun 2015 #2
A haha, yup. William Buckley was part of that club, too. closeupready Jun 2015 #3
Yes, but Buckley did it on the fly so you know he wasn't looking up the words. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #4
Yes, my feeling as well - a repugnant genius. closeupready Jun 2015 #5

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. When I first saw that phrase, I thought he just made it up.
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:35 AM
Jun 2015

Curious, I looked it up:

jiggery-pokery - [jig-uh-ree-poh-kuh-ree]

Word Origin
noun, Chiefly British

1. trickery, hocus-pocus; fraud; humbug.
2. sly, underhanded action.


I guess it was a somewhat more civil choice than actually calling his fellow justices any of the other words.

rock

(13,218 posts)
2. One smart guy, and he felt smart!
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:36 AM
Jun 2015

Two smart guys, and they felt smart!
Three smart guys, and they felt smart!
...

(Now, say it fast!)

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
4. Yes, but Buckley did it on the fly so you know he wasn't looking up the words.
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:59 AM
Jun 2015

Buckley actually probably was a genius. A repugnant genius in many ways, but still a genius.

Will and Scalia only do it in writing so one cannot tell. And Will is no Buckley, that is for sure. Scalia - well, you really can't compare Scalia to anybody. He is one of a kind.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
5. Yes, my feeling as well - a repugnant genius.
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:01 PM
Jun 2015

A shame he misused his abilities in the way he did.

Patrick Moynihan, in contrast, was also kind of in that club, but he was, of course, on our side.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Jiggery Pokery"...