Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,909 posts)
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 02:34 PM Jun 2015

U.S. top court rules for white supremacist over sentencing

Source: Reuters

US | Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:49am EDT

U.S. top court rules for white supremacist over sentencing

WASHINGTON | BY LAWRENCE HURLEY

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday threw out part of a tough federal criminal sentencing law for being overly broad in a ruling that backed a Minnesota white supremacist who challenged his sentence on a firearms crime.

The court ruled in favor of Samuel Johnson, who was given 15 years in prison for illegally possessing a firearm. The justices found on a 6-3 vote that a sentencing provision of the federal Armed Career Criminal Act is so expansive that it violated the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment, which mandates due process under the law.

He will now be resentenced and will face a maximum sentence of 10 years. The ruling could also affect other inmates in similar situations.

The law imposes a minimum 15-year sentence when a defendant is convicted of possessing a firearm and has previously been convicted of at least three qualifying crimes, including violent felonies. The law outlines the crimes covered, including burglary and arson.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/26/us-usa-court-sentencing-idUSKBN0P61V720150626
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. top court rules for white supremacist over sentencing (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2015 OP
"The weakest link in any civil rights case is usually the plaintiff." KamaAina Jun 2015 #1
Virtually every major civil rights case regarding criminal procedure blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #2
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. "The weakest link in any civil rights case is usually the plaintiff."
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jun 2015

"Make that always the plaintiff."

 

blueridge3210

(1,401 posts)
2. Virtually every major civil rights case regarding criminal procedure
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 03:06 PM
Jun 2015

has involved plaintiffs who were not nice people.

Mapp v. Ohio

Gideon v. Wainwright.

Escobido/Miranda v. Arizona

In Re Gault.

The plaintiff's claim was valid. Possession of a prohibited item is not a violent felony in and of itself. He's still facing a 10 year stretch and the Feds do not have parole; at best he is looking at a possible 18 month reduction for good behavior.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. top court rules for ...