Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 04:56 PM Jul 2015

How BP’s $18.7 Billion Gulf Spill Fine Could Be One Giant Tax Deduction

From Newsweek :

On Thursday, the oil company BP reached an agreement to pay $18.7 billion to settle all the remaining federal and state claims from the years of litigation following the catastrophic 2010 Gulf oil spill. But thanks to provisions in the tax code, they might be able to deduct a large chunk of that sum from their taxes.

According to tax code, when a company pays a fine, the company is free to write it off their corporate income taxes, unless the fine is expressly for violation of the law. Typically that's indicated by the fine being called a “penalty,” meant to punish the company for wrongdoing. If the language of the settlement describes the fine differently—as “money to resolve claims,” or money used for restoration, for example—the fine can be treated for tax purposes as a business expense. Or, put another way, the fines can be treated as though they were “just compensating for damages that happened, the same way as you were a company that cleaned someone’s rugs and you spilled something on their rugs, you pay them to replace their rug,” explained Phineas Baxandall, the senior tax and budget policy analyst at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG), a consumer-oriented nonprofit that advocates against such write-offs.

But in a fact sheet published Thursday, the DOJ does not refer to the remaining $13.2 billion of the settlement using “penalty” language. Over the next 18 years, BP will pay $8.1 billion for “natural resource damages,” the fact sheet states. $5.9 billion will be split between five states and several local governments to “settle claims” for spill-related “economic damages,” and the remaining $600 million will go to an array of other unresolved damage claims, including the cost of doing the natural resource damage assessments. This fact sheet is not the final agreement, but it could indicate that the remaining $13.2 billion could be written off by BP.

In BP does write off the remaining $13.2 billion as losses of corporate income, which is taxed at 35 percent, the fine could amount to $8.58 billion in tax deductions for the company. The actual tax value of the whole settlement, then, would be $14.08 billion, not $18.7 billion.

http://www.newsweek.com/how-bps-187-billion-gulf-spill-fine-could-be-one-giant-tax-deduction-349637

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. Just look at the structure of this settlement.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 05:08 PM
Jul 2015

Watch and see,BP gets a GE negative Tax refund in the amount paid in settlements. And,people wonder why. Just buy your Senator that is on the Tax Writing Committee.

lpbk2713

(42,757 posts)
7. They will probably get a break on their "we are the good guys" ads.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 05:12 PM
Jul 2015



For months after the disaster they ran regional TV promos and full page newspaper ads portraying themselves as something they most definitely were not. What was that The Quitter used to say about lipstick on a pig?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. it's very possible that parts of it aren't a penalty
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 05:12 PM
Jul 2015

if they're compensating people for damages incurred because of the spill, then that isn't a fine, but rather paying compensation

penalties are meant to punish and deter, not make someone else whole.

similar to jury verdicts where there are compensatory damages and punitive damages.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
10. Should be a penalty, but even if a deduction, BP still is out $11 Billion in tax costs. Not to
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 05:25 PM
Jul 2015

mention direct cost to BP of the leak. Not enough, but they are having to pay something substantial. Plus, I think a number of folks were canned. I think they should have been fined enough to drive them out of business, but that has to be balanced against job loss, etc., I guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How BP’s $18.7 Billion Gu...