Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How about whisking all the talk about polygamy into its own protected group? (Original Post) pnwmom Jul 2015 OP
Good idea! I think those advocating polygamy haven't thought far shraby Jul 2015 #1
Certainly. Not sure I see the problem. (nt) enough Jul 2015 #3
and? Man from Pickens Jul 2015 #10
Polyamory is becoming more popular 4now Jul 2015 #18
On what grounds do you make that claim MattBaggins Jul 2015 #24
Here are some links 4now Jul 2015 #25
I don't see the problem. Kurska Jul 2015 #21
Have you considered using your trash can? n/t DeadLetterOffice Jul 2015 #2
Good idea. And don't forget "Auto-trash by Keyword," found on the 'Trash Can' petronius Jul 2015 #6
This is about controlling what others see, not what the OP sees Fumesucker Jul 2015 #11
What posts? I haven't read any. Mind not inquiring enough on that one. libdem4life Jul 2015 #4
Who is 'us' ? Bonx Jul 2015 #5
If you have to ask, you are 'them' pinboy3niner Jul 2015 #12
Ha, I've pretty much always been a 'them' Bonx Jul 2015 #39
What about anti-vaxxers? Do they need a protected group too? hobbit709 Jul 2015 #7
Do you often see anti-vaxx OP's? nt pnwmom Jul 2015 #14
One is too many. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #30
I just wish they sharp_stick Jul 2015 #8
Why? Give it a chance to blow over... use a keywords to filter the posts until then HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #9
R#5 & K for: really. n/t UTUSN Jul 2015 #13
KnR Hekate Jul 2015 #15
ANOTHER polygamy thread in GD? Nye Bevan Jul 2015 #16
Good idea 4now Jul 2015 #17
Excellent! applegrove Jul 2015 #19
Those OPs are in GD to disrupt. U4ikLefty Jul 2015 #20
I agree get the red out Jul 2015 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2015 #22
Auto-trash and trash exist for a reason. Kurska Jul 2015 #23
It's just the latest shiny object cwydro Jul 2015 #26
I hear Olive Garden is plural marriage friendly ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #35
Only if your breastfeeding baby cwydro Jul 2015 #36
Ouch!!!! JoePhilly Jul 2015 #38
That is a good idea get the red out Jul 2015 #27
How about no. PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #29
Keep them here. They're terrific homophobe flypaper. NuclearDem Jul 2015 #31
Lol. cwydro Jul 2015 #32
Because topic trends happen all the time at DU. Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #33
They should create a Plural Marriage group and ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #34
The OP is one of the most active participants in these threads??? With multiple OPs on the subject. Romulox Jul 2015 #37

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. Good idea! I think those advocating polygamy haven't thought far
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:06 PM
Jul 2015

enough ahead. Multiple wives for one man would also mean there can be multiple husbands for one woman.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
10. and?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:01 PM
Jul 2015

I don't see a problem with that. Whatever arrangement people decide is right for them should be considered valid. Who carved the number two in stone?

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
21. I don't see the problem.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 01:22 AM
Jul 2015

3 men, 3 women, 2 men 1 woman, 1 woman 2 men.

All of it ought to be protected.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
6. Good idea. And don't forget "Auto-trash by Keyword," found on the 'Trash Can'
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:22 PM
Jul 2015

tab on every DUer's 'My Account' page...

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
7. What about anti-vaxxers? Do they need a protected group too?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:25 PM
Jul 2015

Or anyone else that you don't agree with.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
8. I just wish they
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:30 PM
Jul 2015

had a keyword in the subject line so it was easy to kill. Damn they've got a lot of terms to use when they talk about having a ton of wives or husbands.

U4ikLefty

(4,012 posts)
20. Those OPs are in GD to disrupt.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 01:21 AM
Jul 2015

The SCOTUS ruling happens and all of the sudden we have tons of pro-polygamy OPs.

Too obvious.

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
28. I agree
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 05:25 AM
Jul 2015

That this is troll-driven. Unfortunately, the trolls aren't just being fed, they are getting steak dinners.

Response to pnwmom (Original post)

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
23. Auto-trash and trash exist for a reason.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 01:24 AM
Jul 2015

If you don't like the posts, trash them.

People are talking about it, because they want to talk about it.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
26. It's just the latest shiny object
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:42 AM
Jul 2015

for those who don't want to admit they oppose gay marriage.

This too will pass.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
35. I hear Olive Garden is plural marriage friendly ...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:36 AM
Jul 2015

... and you can breastfeed while writing in cursive and no one minds.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
37. The OP is one of the most active participants in these threads??? With multiple OPs on the subject.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:37 AM
Jul 2015
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How about whisking all th...