Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 09:27 AM Jul 2015

GOP’s Obamacare muddle: They want to repeal it, but can’t figure out how

The GOP banked on the Supreme Court to help along their Obamacare repeal scheme, and now they're kinda lost

SIMON MALOY


We’re a couple of weeks removed from the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in King v. Burwell upholding the legality of the Affordable Care Act’s insurance subsidies, and it’s growing increasingly clear just how much Republicans in Congress were banking on the court to do their dirty work for them. But now that the court has sided with the government, full responsibility for fulfilling the promise of repealing Obamacare falls to Republicans in Congress, and they’re having a hell of a time figuring out what to do.

Way back in March, Republican leaders in the House and Senate agreed upon a new strategy to try and repeal the healthcare law – they’d nuke it via budget reconciliation. It’s a one-shot tactic that would allow them to push a repeal measure through to passage without having to first overcome a Democratic filibuster. The GOP leadership had previously been wary about going down that road, since it would take away their best tool for getting important, non-symbolic legislation passed. But they figured that repeal-through-reconciliation would make their cranky conservative members happy, and it would finally force President Obama to veto a repeal measure, so it was worth it for the political benefit. They passed a budget resolution which instructed five committees spread across the House and Senate to come up with language repealing portions of the ACA by no later than July 24 – two weeks from today.

With that self-imposed deadline bearing down, one would think Republicans would be busily working to make good on their promise to force an Obamacare repeal to the president’s desk. But they’re not. In fact, as Politico reported yesterday, Republicans in the Senate are “downplaying expectations” that they’ll actually go through with a repeal via reconciliation, and won’t commit to meeting the July 24 deadline:

more
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/10/gops_obamacare_muddle_they_want_to_repeal_it_but_cant_figure_out_how/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP’s Obamacare muddle: They want to repeal it, but can’t figure out how (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2015 OP
Cwy me a wiver. ananda Jul 2015 #1
The best part about repeal is.... Renew Deal Jul 2015 #2
They don't want to repeal the whole thing, just "portions". Insurance companies really like PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #3
Pandering to stupidity has it's shortcomings. GeorgeGist Jul 2015 #4
the problem is that their objection to obamacare has always been political, not philosophical unblock Jul 2015 #5

unblock

(52,243 posts)
5. the problem is that their objection to obamacare has always been political, not philosophical
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jul 2015

if they had to create their own health insurance reform plan, they would have created something remarkably similar to obamacare.

in fact, ***they did!!***

obamacare is essentially the heritage foundation's plan, intended to be a market-oriented alternative to liberal proposals like single-payer.

the right-wing has been objecting to obamacare not because they don't like the law, but because railing against it takes away from an historic victory for their political opponent. presidents have been promising and trying to reform healthcare for ages and obama finally did it. it's hardly perfect, but the simply fact that he was able to achieve it is a remarkable political victory.

the only real philosophical objection they ever claim is not liking the "mandate" part of it. this is pretty facile. similar constructs have existed in the tax code before and they never really objected. it's no more objectionable than tax breaks for putting in solar panels. moreover, a republican president advanced this proposal, they would have railed against the young, healthy people not covered by insurance as "freeloaders" and "moochers" because when they actually get sick, they rely on public services or drive up insurance costs for those who do have policies.


so, while they love the politics of whining and complaining, of course they're having trouble actually repealing the law. in truth, they don't, and can't, really object to it.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP’s Obamacare muddle: T...