They said she donates some, not all, of her speaking fees. Her tax filings show she keeps some. I wish this article indicated the source of its information.

Anyway, Politifact rated this article as untrue, for what it's worth.

and scapegoats Hillary's speaking fees.

Its the same old "Look over there" game the RW plays all the time

HERE:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026960510

Jeb’s South Korean sugar daddy

Bush gave 10 speeches for firm that reaped more than $1 billion from his brother’s administration.

Hillary Clinton donates part, not all, of her speaking fees to the Clinton Foundation.

Hillary Clinton IS running for president, and has known for years that she would be doing so. I am as insulted by Hillary making $250,000 for each of 2 speeches to Citibank as I am by Holder's new job. Both express utter disdain for the Democratic base, the working people who have suffered so much at the hands of Wall Street. I'm pretty disgusted that she cashed in for a while and is now expecting us to hold our noses and vote for her anyway.

George H. W. Bush made lots of money in speaking fees, too. I raised my eyebrows at those reports, but he and Barbara never attempted to return to the White House, so they weren't a campaign issue for the couple.

Jeb Bush's speaking fees are a relevant campaign issue, however, and I hope they are covered in detail.

If it's a Clinton vs. Bush race, I suppose the dirty whiff of corruption, infuriating speaking fee issue will cancel itself out since both sides do it, at least for the voters who show up at the polls. For many others, it will compound their disgust at the pathetic Bush vs. Clinton choice offered by the major parties, and they will stay home in droves. I seriously believe a Clinton vs. Bush race will be the lowest turnout ever for a presidential year, and I don't expect the Democrats to win that low turnout race.

Go Bernie Go!

Sing it, O'Malley!

Although he seems to have changed his last name to an exclamation point.

detail."

Quote from my post, above

Be honest now.

I am not a typical American. I believe there is such a thing as 'enough.' I have enough stuff. I don't need anything more in material goods.

Hillary knows that the Democrats cannot win without the votes of the Occupy Wall Street young people and their supporters. Young people need to enthusiastically turn out at the polls in large numbers if we're to win in November 2016.

Even if Hillary wanted the money badly, she should have had enough self discipline to turn down these speaking opportunities that are insults to the millions of working Americans who had their homes fraudulently taken by these banks. Now she is asking for the votes of people who have suffered at the hands of the banksters.

As I said, I don't see that winning for the Democrats in November 2016.

Whoop dee do...

unfortunate in my view, of having to deal with two political family dynasties, one in each major party. all of their activities will be scrutinized as well they should. former presidents have a right to earn money, but the perception is that they are part of the financial ultra elite while the rest of us are dealing with unemployment or long hours or crappy wages.

this only increases the credibility of bernie's fight for the middle class.