Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 10:42 PM Jul 2015

Background Check Flaw Let Dylann Roof Buy Gun, F.B.I. Says

WASHINGTON — The man accused of killing nine people in a historically black church in South Carolina last month was able to buy the gun used in the attack because of a breakdown in the federal gun background check system, the F.B.I. said Friday.

Despite having previously admitted to drug possession, the man, Dylann Roof, 21, was allowed to buy the .45-caliber handgun because of mistakes by F.B.I. agents, a failure by local prosecutors to respond to a bureau request for more information about his case, and a weakness in federal gun laws.

“We are all sick this happened,” said James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director. “We wish we could turn back time. From this vantage point, everything seems obvious.”


The authorities’ inability to prevent Mr. Roof from obtaining the weapon highlighted the continuing problems in the background check system, which was designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, drug users and mentally ill people. Despite new procedures and billions of dollars that have been spent on computer upgrades in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, federal authorities still do not have a seamless way of examining Americans’ criminal histories that eliminates human error.

Mr. Roof exploited the three-day waiting time that has allowed thousands of prohibited buyers to legally purchase firearms over the past decade — and some of those weapons were ultimately used in crimes, according to court records and government documents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/11/us/background-check-flaw-let-dylann-roof-buy-gun-fbi-says.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share&_r=0
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Background Check Flaw Let Dylann Roof Buy Gun, F.B.I. Says (Original Post) BainsBane Jul 2015 OP
We need strong congresional members who has the will to pass the Brady Bill. Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #1
this is the Brady act Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #10
Uhhh, the Brady Bill was passed in 1994. GGJohn Jul 2015 #12
I see you posted part of a news story. Snobblevitch Jul 2015 #2
Sorry about that, Yes. BainsBane Jul 2015 #3
I'm not able to figure out if this is a news story, Snobblevitch Jul 2015 #6
It's a news story from the NYTimes BainsBane Jul 2015 #7
Not really a flaw Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #4
In other words, just how the gun lobby wants it. BainsBane Jul 2015 #5
Exactly. n/t zappaman Jul 2015 #8
Along with the Brady people Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #9
False BainsBane Jul 2015 #11
so you are saying they did not support the Brady act of 1994 Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #13
I am SAYING BainsBane Jul 2015 #14
he went through a background check Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #16
Good Grief.. you wouldn't think anyone who cares about sensible gun laws would be against this? Cha Jul 2015 #15
Law enforcement screws up enforcing the laws already on the books -- again. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #17

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. We need strong congresional members who has the will to pass the Brady Bill.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 10:47 PM
Jul 2015

Yes, I know he could have stolen a weapon and to those come up with a better plan than the Brady Bill and then we can pass the better bill. I own guns, have hunted, have family members who still hunt and do not see the need to remove weapons from members who has the ability to own, operate and protect a weapon.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
10. this is the Brady act
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:32 PM
Jul 2015
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Act) of 1993, Public Law 103-159, required that the U.S. Attorney General establish the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to contact by telephone, or other electronic means, for information to be supplied immediately on whether the transfer of a firearm would be in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922 (g) or (n) or state law. Through a cooperative effort with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and local and state law enforcement agencies, the FBI developed the NICS, which became operational on November 30, 1998.

When an FFL initiates a NICS background check, a name (and limited descriptor) search is conducted to identify any matching records in three nationally held databases. These databases are:

The Interstate Identification Index (III), which contains an expansive number of criminal history records;
The National Crime Information Center (NCIC), which contains information on wanted persons, protection orders, deported felons and others; and
The NICS Index, which contains records, contributed by local, state, and federal agencies, pertaining to individuals federally prohibited the transfer of a firearm.

Additionally, a fourth search will be conducted via the applicable databases of the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on all non-U.S. citizens.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/federal-firearms-licensees/nics-information-sheet

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
12. Uhhh, the Brady Bill was passed in 1994.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:38 PM
Jul 2015

The 2A has zero to do with hunting, it has everything to do with the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
2. I see you posted part of a news story.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 10:52 PM
Jul 2015

Do you have a link? I highly doubt that billions of dollars have been spent on the computers used for gun purchasing background checks.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
6. I'm not able to figure out if this is a news story,
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:07 PM
Jul 2015

or if it is an opinion piece. If it is a news story, there is information included that needs attribution, but it is missing.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
4. Not really a flaw
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:03 PM
Jul 2015

Plain incompetence, get the correct information into the current system and it will work fine. Curious if the final denial was issued to the dealer at all. If it was then the dealer must notify the ATF of the prohibited person that has been sold a firearm. Also sounds like he may have committed a felony by lying on his 4473 form on drug use.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
9. Along with the Brady people
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:30 PM
Jul 2015

The whole law was a compromise.

The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Act) of 1993, Public Law 103-159, required that the U.S. Attorney General establish the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to contact by telephone, or other electronic means, for information to be supplied immediately on whether the transfer of a firearm would be in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922 (g) or (n) or state law. Through a cooperative effort with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and local and state law enforcement agencies, the FBI developed the NICS, which became operational on November 30, 1998.


With the participation of the states and federal government, 72 hours should be plenty of time to run a background check. Mine come back in around 5 minutes. The key and everybody agrees is to have valid and accurate information. If after 3 days with no word back from the ATF, the sale may go ahead. They know the rules. If after the fact a denial is received the FFL must inform the ATF of the prohibited person having the firearm.

When an FFL initiates a NICS background check, a name (and limited descriptor) search is conducted to identify any matching records in three nationally held databases. These databases are:

The Interstate Identification Index (III), which contains an expansive number of criminal history records;
The National Crime Information Center (NCIC), which contains information on wanted persons, protection orders, deported felons and others; and
The NICS Index, which contains records, contributed by local, state, and federal agencies, pertaining to individuals federally prohibited the transfer of a firearm.

Additionally, a fourth search will be conducted via the applicable databases of the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on all non-U.S. citizens.

What Is a Delay Response?

When conducting a firearm background check, if the NICS returns a valid match to potentially prohibiting record information maintained in any of the aforementioned databases, the NICS Legal Instruments Examiner (NICS Examiner) will evaluate the record information and attempt to provide the FFL with a definitive response of either proceed or deny while the FFL is still on the telephone. However, in many instances, records are incomplete and/or lack final status (such as conviction, dismissal, crime classification level, etc.). In these instances, the NICS Examiner will advise the FFL that the transaction has been placed in a “delay” status pending further research and conclude the initial call. A delay response does not mean that an individual is denied the transfer of a firearm. A delay response requires that a NICS Examiner conduct additional research and evaluation of the matched records by contacting local, state, and/or federal law enforcement agencies in an effort to obtain the information needed to complete the record(s) and determine if the information contained therein is disqualifying pursuant to the Brady Act. In such cases, the Brady Act allows up to three business days to attempt to obtain the missing or incomplete information. If the information needed cannot be obtained prior to the expiration of three business days and the NICS is unable to provide either a proceed or a deny response, it is the FFL’s option to legally transfer the firearm.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/federal-firearms-licensees/nics-information-sheet

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
11. False
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:32 PM
Jul 2015

the Brady campaign supports a bill that would close those loopholes, the ones certain elements claim don't exist.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence said Friday that the bill, H.R. 1217, could have prevented the missteps, including a background check oversight, which allowed Roof to acquire the weapon.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/charleston-church-shooting/dylann-roofs-illegal-gun-purchase-feeds-gun-law-arguments-both-n390321
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
13. so you are saying they did not support the Brady act of 1994
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 11:48 PM
Jul 2015

that set up the NICS system, interesting.

Jim and Sarah Brady were guests of honor when President Bill Clinton signed the Brady Act into law on November 30, 1993.[12] President Clinton has stated, "If it hadn't been for them, we would not have passed the Brady Law."[13] In December 2000, the Boards of Trustees for HCI and the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence voted to honor Jim and Sarah Brady's hard work and commitment to gun control by renaming the two organizations the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.[14]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Handgun_Violence_Prevention_Act

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
14. I am SAYING
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 02:27 AM
Jul 2015

The Brady campaign support closing the loopholes that you and your gungeon pals claim don't exist, as the article makes clear. The thing about money grubbing gun corporations is they find ways around the law to ensure they sell as many guns as possible. Their friends in the pro-2a community work hard to ensure they are able to continue that by resisting any and all gun control including expanded background checks. I for one recall the great celebration by gungeoneers the night Obama's background check bill was defeated. Such deliberate fissures in the system enable felons to acquire guns and kill more people, which in turn generates more gun sales. It's a win/win all the way around for the merchants of death.

This isn't 1994. Things are far worse in terms of access to guns, and the people who ally themselves with blood-drenched corporate profits over human life help make sure it stays that way. To pretend there has not been ongoing efforts to close those loopholes since 94 is a transparent and cynical ploy. You forget I have discussed these issues with you in the past and you have denied the loopholes exist. Now you falsely claim they are there because the Brady campaign wants them, when the fact is they have been fighting to close those loopholes for some time.

Now, I have heard countless times how there are no loopholes in the background check system, how the law is already adequate and how there is no such thing as purchasing guns without a background check. Any honest person knows that to be a complete lie, but that doesn't stop the NRA and its henchmen from spreading it anyway.





 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
16. he went through a background check
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 09:17 AM
Jul 2015

If the STATE would have provided the CORRECT information into the FEDERAL system it appears the sale would have been stopped. No maybe the only thing that may have helped is the weapon should not have been allowed to be sold until a positive from NICS. But how long is a reasonable time to restrict a right to a law abiding person? The agreement at the time was 3 days.

The current system should have worked. Lets fix that. I have no issues with UBC and I wish NICS would be opened up to private purchases.

Cha

(297,373 posts)
15. Good Grief.. you wouldn't think anyone who cares about sensible gun laws would be against this?
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 03:09 AM
Jul 2015
"Despite having previously admitted to drug possession, the man, Dylann Roof, 21, was allowed to buy the .45-caliber handgun because of mistakes by F.B.I. agents, a failure by local prosecutors to respond to a bureau request for more information about his case, and a weakness in federal gun laws."

Please let us learn from these tragic flaws and mistakes.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
17. Law enforcement screws up enforcing the laws already on the books -- again.
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 09:30 AM
Jul 2015

Earlier this year President Obama shifting funding and focus to updating the flagging NIC System. I applaud his action and would like to see more emphasis placed on keeping it up to date. I would also like NICS opened to private purchases.

Virtually all of the rampage killers: Loughner, Cho, Holmes, Alexis, Hasan, Rogers, Roof, etc. had prior behavioral/criminal interactions with authorities that would have disqualified them from purchasing their guns. These are not out-of-the-blue, spontaneous, nobody-could-have-seen-it coming incidences. There was plenty of warning. There was plenty of time to intervene.

The law enforcement community needs to stop gunning down children or choking unarmed cigarette peddlers and actually focus doing their job of enforcing the laws on the books.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Background Check Flaw Let...