General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEvil Almonds? California's Drought Villain Is a Climate Change Hero
(Photo: David Gomez/Getty Images)
The crop everyone loves to hate stores a whole lot of carbon
http://www.takepart.com/article/2015/07/07/almonds-carbon-climate-change?cmpid=tpfood-eml-2015-07-11-ads
JUL 7, 2015Willy Blackmore is TakeParts Food editor.
More than half a million acres of California farmland will be left bare this year, a vast expanse of arid dirt that is both a symbol and a symptom of the four-year-long drought, considered to be the worst in 1,200 years.
Not the almond farms, though. Water will continue to flow to most of the states 1-million-plus acres of No. 1 cash crop (not counting marijuana). With at least 25 years of potential production in each tree, farmers can't afford to simply shut down an almond orchard without millions of dollars of their investment and future revenue drying up right along with the trees. So they are going after every available sourcegroundwater, chieflyto keep the taps on.
It appears to be a gross abuse of resources: Why should water go to keeping thirsty, hedge-fund-backed, foreign-bound nuts alive while other farmers are unable to grow the more water-efficient crops that feed the nation? But thats an oversimplification on a number of levelsthe dont blame almonds essay is becoming a genre unto itselfincluding subterranean ones. While those 500,000-some acres of fallow land are losing soil fertility and releasing stored carbon, Californias maligned almonds, as well as other perennial fruit and nut crops, are sucking up CO2 and keeping it in the soil. According to one carbon life cycle analysis of the industry, with proper management and a credit system, the states almond industry could sequester more carbon than it emits. Do we need to reimagine the infamous nut a climate change savior?
So, Why Should You Care? Agriculture plays a complex role in climate and climate modeling. If the worlds cropland is farmed with little regard for carbon production, the 14 percent of overall emissions that agriculture accounts for could help push humanity toward the climate catastrophe of a two-degree-Celsius rise in global average temperature. Conversely, careful management of farmland could turn agriculture into part of the solution. Instead of pumping out greenhouse gases, farms need to be planned and managed in such a manner that they capture and sequester carbon in both plants and the soil. One of the key ways of achieving that goal is to transition away from annual row crops and toward perennialslike almonds.
FULL story at link.
KT2000
(20,585 posts)is enjoying popularity in the US. I wonder what the net gain/loss is compared to maintaining dairy cattle?
Igel
(35,323 posts)the fact that it took years of water to bring the trees to production and they'll produce for years is one reason to cut them some slack. If you let your broccoli field dry up, meh. Fewer than 110 days from sowing to harvest, you can get your broccoli field from dirt to green to harvest 3 times in a year, heat permitting.
Almonds require less tilling of the soil and for all the water they consume they take much less than most leaf vegetables. They're a drought-tolerant plant, which is more than I can say for things like broccoli. Same is true for other plants, like pomegranates. You want to water them for a good harvest, but minimal watering lets them survive for a long, long time. But broccoli is a food; pomegranates and almonds are luxuries, compared with people dying from thirst in the deserts of Santa Monica.
Another reason people don't like almonds is because they're expensive and viewed as a crop favored by big corporate landowners for export.