Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:45 AM Jul 2015

The Earned Income Tax Credit may be even better than we thought

America's best program for the poor may be even better than we thought
http://www.vox.com/2015/7/16/8974745/eitc-study-hoynes-patel

The Earned Income Tax Credit isn't super well-known, but it's one of the best tools the federal government has for fighting poverty. It functions as a wage subsidy for the working poor, providing an average of $2,982 a year to families with children come tax season. The results are impressive. According to the Census Bureau, refundable tax credits like the EITC and the similarly structured Child Tax Credit cut the poverty rate (correctly measured) by 3 percentage points in 2013 — that's 9.4 million people kept out of poverty.

But a new study suggests that even that is an underestimate. UC Berkeley economist Hilary Hoynes and the Treasury Department's Ankur Patel find that the EITC might be twice as effective at fighting poverty as the census estimate suggests.

Hoynes and Patel focus on the credit's effect on single women with children, the single biggest group of recipients. It's well-known that the EITC encourages nonworking single moms and dads to enter the workforce; an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that EITC brought more single mothers into the workforce in the 1990s than welfare reform did. That means that it boosts income not just by giving people money, but by getting people to work more and bring in more in wages. These increased wages can reduce income in other ways, such as by making people ineligible for programs like food stamps, but on the whole it boosts pay.

(snip)
The analysis comes with a caveat, however. Hoynes and Patel pinpoint one big weakness of EITC: It doesn't really do much for the poorest of the poor. "The EITC has an estimated zero effect on the share above poverty for those with income below 50% of the poverty threshold," they write. "This may reflect that the very lowest income groups have little attachment to the labor market." That suggests you need things like robust Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income and food stamps, which don't require recipients to work on top of EITC. It's an important program, but not the only one that matters.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Earned Income Tax Credit may be even better than we thought (Original Post) cal04 Jul 2015 OP
.....families with children come tax season. SamKnause Jul 2015 #1
One thing I noticed when I did tax work brer cat Jul 2015 #2

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
1. .....families with children come tax season.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:03 AM
Jul 2015

It does nothing for the working poor with no children.

It does nothing for the working poor with grown children that

have left home.

I am very glad that families get help, but it seems those

without children or grown children are always left out.

What constitutes poverty is this country needs to be updated.

No one should live in poverty in the richest country in history.

brer cat

(24,587 posts)
2. One thing I noticed when I did tax work
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:03 AM
Jul 2015

was that the EITC allowed the recipients to make large purchases that they couldn't save up for on their skimpy earnings. For example, we were often told that the refund was going to be used for a purchase or repair of a vehicle. By having the funds to do that, they were far more likely to keep their job or find a better one due to the increased mobility or reliability from their vehicle. Another often cited use was for medical care that they couldn't afford from their salary. Again, this was something that likely would improve their ability to work.

It burns me when I hear conservatives complain that the money is thrown away on purchases of luxury items. I am sure some do that, but the ones we worked with usually had a practical need that would be fulfilled.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Earned Income Tax Cre...