General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDenver Is Leading The Way In Dismantling The School-To-Prison Pipeline. Here's How.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/15/denver-public-schools-discipline_n_7715358.htmlIt wasn't until high school that Becerra, 18, who came to the U.S. from Mexico as a young child, realized it wasn't. In his new school the administration offered emotional support to struggling students instead of a zero-tolerance policy that demanded blanket punishments for even minor infractions....
The changes Becerra experienced are representative of a transformation administrators at Denver Public Schools (DPS) are trying to create for students at all levels in the district. Over the past decade, DPS has emerged as a national leader in its push to end the so-called school-to-prison pipeline, which experts say funnels children into the nation's jails through zero-tolerance policies that criminalize student misbehavior. Zero-tolerance policies can push students out of schools and onto the streets through excessive suspensions. Having cops in schools can also be a factor, because it means police are more likely to intervene in instances of student misbehavior than teachers and administrators.
Through working with a local grassroots group called Padres & Jóvenes Unidos, which translates as "Parents and youth united," the district has taken strides to rewrite its discipline codes. With the help of the organization, the district and the local police department -- which supplies resource officers for schools -- signed an agreement in 2013 that clarified and limited the power of police in schools. As a result, Denver schools have seen a substantial drop in the number of student suspensions and expulsions, according to a report the group released in May. In the 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 school years, in-school suspensions dropped 27 percent, out-of-school suspensions dropped 10 percent and expulsions dropped nine percent.
benld74
(9,908 posts)Igel
(35,332 posts)Keeping every kid in the classroom. At any price. That's the purpose of schools, after all.
Even if research is clear: Those who suffer most from classroom disruptions are at-risk kids. That means POC, that means the poor. But we're willing to sacrifice those.
Research is also clear: Most teachers, given about 10-15% disruptors in the classroom, will just find other jobs--leaving the school to new recruits, those who didn't make it at other schools, and the very, very dedicated. Those "with the program." So teacher quality tends to suffer--not their paper qualifications, not what they could do, but what they're willing to settle for doing.
Again, no sacrifice is too great to keep the kids in the classroom.
High school administrators should be put in a classroom for at least 2 classes per year, and in their role as teacher they have no additional authority. A kid acts out, the administrator files a regular referral and is not in charge of that kid's discipline, nor can he mentor "his" students in any way that a teacher cannot. However, the administrator's evaluation is based on not just on administration-level skills, but at least 50% on classroom observation and student test scores. If a parent calls, the administrator is a teacher, and in a parent-teacher meeting another administrator has to be present.