the deal was that the kids don't meet his girlfriend, and nobody seems to have bothered to open the door anyway when she showed up with the kids for visitation.

And who is claiming that?

Aside from which, they've been divorced since November. She is his fiancée. He is going to get married and the "deal" was that the kids would never meet his wife? I doubt that.

but a lot of other things were left to the imagination, too.

so far; and no video has popped up, although the ex claims to have taken some.

So, we really don't know what she did, or didn't do.

All we do know is that she showed up for visitation and for some reason he didn't answer the door to take the kids.

Given the headline "Video Said To..." and the fact that she was charged, I'm inclined to believe the prosecutors office had seen the video prior to charging her with that, instead of merely taking the ex-husband's say-so.

to prosecute a local politician for lifting her shirt on private property. Why is my mind wandering off to thoughts of her rich ex having political ties of his own...

BTW, if she was wearing a bra, would lifting her shirt be indecent exposure?

And the yelling and screaming-- if it did happen, how often is it in ex-marital disputes and how often is it prosecuted?

Although there were neighbors interviewed, none said they actually saw the hysteria. Maybe they did, it's just not in the aired interviews. And no interviews with the ex or the girlfriend.

Too many assumptions with too little facts-- all leading me to wonder if the wealthy investment banker has some other reason for embarrassing his ex wife who just happens to be a local politician aiming for higher office.

Since she's been charged, it seems likely that the prosecutors have found the case against her to be sufficient to proceed.

I simply asked a question.

And another question is-- why is everyone assuming the "official" story is correct?

Just for shits and giggles, imagine what the response around here would be if she was black. Would everyone so happily assume she was in the wrong when confronting an investment banker?

This is what you decided to wonder:

Says it's the strangest thing he's ever heard of. Heard of, not seen.

My bad.

These jokers are all looking for a bust in the mouth!

I wouldn't want to nurse a grudge.

I feel bad for just responding to the thread tittle and not setting the bra higher.

This is series!

I gots it!

?v=1

How large would the breasts have to be ? Was the exposure of said brests decent ?
Law stuff is important .

Why would someone bare their breasts in this type of situation. Regardless, I do agree with the trespassing violation since she was asked multiple times to leave.

Also, if you cannot have a civil relationship with an ex, drop the kids off and just watch to make sure they go into the house.

A friend is divorced from her son's father. He's an asshole and she doesn't want to see him, so she just does the drop & watch.

And the other thing that doesn't make sense. So supposedly the father wasn't supposed to have the fiancé around the kids. If they get married, does his ex wife expect their stepmom to never ever see them or know them? That's just silly.

As the kid grows up, he'll realize his dad is a deadbeat.