Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDKos-Sandra Bland dashcam footage: not edited
Daily Kos:The Sandra Bland dashcam footage was not edited. There are some loops, but thats common with raw dashcam footage. Ive uploaded a video using footage from my own dashcam to show it happening.
First, a disclaimer: I havent studied every frame of the Sandra Bland dashcam footage. I watched it through and was horrified at the way she was treated.
Earlier today, the raw footage was pulled from YouTube, likely because people are claiming it shows clumsy signs of editing, at around 25 minutes, and again at 32 minutes, and perhaps elsewhere. Even NBC is running a story on it. But those loops are not a sign of editing. They actually suggest that it wasnt edited. Its just a side effect of how many dashcams work. Anybody used to working with video cameras might be surprised at the differences.
Dashcams record continuously, but they have limited storage space. They cant write one very long, ever-increasing movie file. Instead, they record file after file, then erase the oldest files to make space. My own dashcam, a G1W, is set to record in three minute chunks. Others might use seven minutes or fifteen minutes, or perhaps base it on file size instead of the time
First, a disclaimer: I havent studied every frame of the Sandra Bland dashcam footage. I watched it through and was horrified at the way she was treated.
Earlier today, the raw footage was pulled from YouTube, likely because people are claiming it shows clumsy signs of editing, at around 25 minutes, and again at 32 minutes, and perhaps elsewhere. Even NBC is running a story on it. But those loops are not a sign of editing. They actually suggest that it wasnt edited. Its just a side effect of how many dashcams work. Anybody used to working with video cameras might be surprised at the differences.
Dashcams record continuously, but they have limited storage space. They cant write one very long, ever-increasing movie file. Instead, they record file after file, then erase the oldest files to make space. My own dashcam, a G1W, is set to record in three minute chunks. Others might use seven minutes or fifteen minutes, or perhaps base it on file size instead of the time
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 827 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DKos-Sandra Bland dashcam footage: not edited (Original Post)
brooklynite
Jul 2015
OP
how does erasing an older file lead to seeing the same car multiple times
virtualobserver
Jul 2015
#1
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)1. how does erasing an older file lead to seeing the same car multiple times
with continuous audio.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)2. It causes a skip in the video
not really all that uncommon although more modern technology can get around it.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)4. I can understand a momentary blank out....
but not a replaying of previous video.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)3. Does anyone know how the audio was recorded? Anonymous guy at Kos doesn't know.
Also, if the file looped at 25 minutes, and again 7 minutes later, why didn't it loop every 7 minutes?
I'm open to the possibility that I totally misunderstood him