Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,221 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 12:42 AM Jul 2015

"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.”

In the Pacific Northwest, everything west of Interstate 5 covers some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people. When the next full-margin rupture happens, that region will suffer the worst natural disaster in the history of North America. Roughly three thousand people died in San Francisco’s 1906 earthquake. Almost two thousand died in Hurricane Katrina. Almost three hundred died in Hurricane Sandy. FEMA projects that nearly thirteen thousand people will die in the Cascadia earthquake and tsunami. Another twenty-seven thousand will be injured, and the agency expects that it will need to provide shelter for a million displaced people, and food and water for another two and a half million. “This is one time that I’m hoping all the science is wrong, and it won’t happen for another thousand years,” Murphy says.

In fact, the science is robust, and one of the chief scientists behind it is Chris Goldfinger. Thanks to work done by him and his colleagues, we now know that the odds of the big Cascadia earthquake happening in the next fifty years are roughly one in three. The odds of the very big one are roughly one in ten. Even those numbers do not fully reflect the danger—or, more to the point, how unprepared the Pacific Northwest is to face it. The truly worrisome figures in this story are these: Thirty years ago, no one knew that the Cascadia subduction zone had ever produced a major earthquake. Forty-five years ago, no one even knew it existed.

In May of 1804, Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, together with their Corps of Discovery, set off from St. Louis on America’s first official cross-country expedition. Eighteen months later, they reached the Pacific Ocean and made camp near the present-day town of Astoria, Oregon. The United States was, at the time, twenty-nine years old. Canada was not yet a country. The continent’s far expanses were so unknown to its white explorers that Thomas Jefferson, who commissioned the journey, thought that the men would come across woolly mammoths. Native Americans had lived in the Northwest for millennia, but they had no written language, and the many things to which the arriving Europeans subjected them did not include seismological inquiries. The newcomers took the land they encountered at face value, and at face value it was a find: vast, cheap, temperate, fertile, and, to all appearances, remarkably benign.

A century and a half elapsed before anyone had any inkling that the Pacific Northwest was not a quiet place but a place in a long period of quiet. It took another fifty years to uncover and interpret the region’s seismic history. Geology, as even geologists will tell you, is not normally the sexiest of disciplines; it hunkers down with earthly stuff while the glory accrues to the human and the cosmic—to genetics, neuroscience, physics. But, sooner or later, every field has its field day, and the discovery of the Cascadia subduction zone stands as one of the greatest scientific detective stories of our time.



http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.” (Original Post) RandySF Jul 2015 OP
I bumped in to Reggie Lee who plays the Asian cop in Grimm series on my trip home for Christmas cascadiance Jul 2015 #1
Let me piggyback on your comment to make an important point to everyone. RandySF Jul 2015 #2
Oh yes, but far more will die if you neglect the infrastructure... cascadiance Jul 2015 #4
it's hard to imagine Needa Moment Jul 2015 #7
If they are projecting fifty years ... lpbk2713 Jul 2015 #3
Whew! I'm 2 miles EAST of I-5. I'm safe! n/t Binkie The Clown Jul 2015 #5
I'm 2 miles west of I-5 jhart3333 Jul 2015 #8
I literally live on a faultline. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2015 #15
My daughter in the S.F. Bay area is across the street from the San Andreas fault. Binkie The Clown Jul 2015 #17
I'm about 3 miles east of I-5 Spirochete Jul 2015 #18
it probably will depend shanti Jul 2015 #23
Gak! Spirochete Jul 2015 #29
that's a good thing! shanti Jul 2015 #32
I'm on the Olympic Peninsula blindersoff Jul 2015 #33
... davidpdx Jul 2015 #6
Otisburg? Berlin Expat Jul 2015 #12
Yes, Hackman is the best davidpdx Jul 2015 #14
Not sure I'm buying the 240-year thing re Seattle Flying Squirrel Jul 2015 #9
In SLC we're constantly under the threat of having the Big One... Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #10
FWIW, there are reputable scientists saying the real risk is to the coast, not to Seattle itself. pnwmom Jul 2015 #11
The tsunami will wipe the coast off of the map. RandySF Jul 2015 #19
Again, the other experts differ with this guy on the amount of damage to Seattle. pnwmom Jul 2015 #20
Which kind of makes earthquake/tsunami seem preferable, really Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #25
Well, there's a big rock in the Azores... TreasonousBastard Jul 2015 #13
My thoughts exactly. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2015 #30
Tsunami evacuation signs in our area blindersoff Jul 2015 #34
Portland is split in half by I5 (I grew up there) mindwalker_i Jul 2015 #16
Read about that the other day, 3000 would be more like 60000 Rex Jul 2015 #21
I've got a boatload of canned food, I'm storing water, candles, etc. Arugula Latte Jul 2015 #22
.. Liberal_in_LA Jul 2015 #24
And it might happen in the next couple thousand years! Oneironaut Jul 2015 #26
I better tell my cousin aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2015 #27
Earthquakes are scary. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2015 #28
shit. Hatchling Jul 2015 #31
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
1. I bumped in to Reggie Lee who plays the Asian cop in Grimm series on my trip home for Christmas
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 01:04 AM
Jul 2015

... a couple of years ago.

I made a suggestion then after Portland has voted down a number of measures at the ballot boxes that would fix a lot of the aging schools and other public buildings in this area to make them more earthquake proof. I was saying that perhaps their script writers could write an episode where a fictional Vessen had the power to make earthquakes, and then to have that episode project what would really do a city like Portland, who's a lot less prepared for earthquakes than California is. He said he liked the idea and would forward it to the screen writers. The end of that season had a cliff hanger where the new Vessen baby caused the earth to tremble, but the subsequent season didn't have that plot scenario play out. Maybe with this report they might revisit that notion.

I'd like to think that if fiction can show the horror of what could happen, perhaps it could build awareness here in the northwest that we need to do more to prepare for this likely monstrosity when it happens in reality.

RandySF

(59,221 posts)
2. Let me piggyback on your comment to make an important point to everyone.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 01:12 AM
Jul 2015

And because it is so important, I want to write all-caps.


AN "EARTHQUAKE PROOF" BUILDING MEANS ONLY THAT YOU ARE LESS LIKLEY TO DIE IF YOU ARE IN IT. NO ENGINEER WILL EVER GUARANTEE THAT YOU WILL GET TO USE IT AFTER A MAJOR QUAKE.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
4. Oh yes, but far more will die if you neglect the infrastructure...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 01:39 AM
Jul 2015

People in California (I used to live there) are used to ensuring that buildings and other infrastructure are up to code, but like you said, that still doesn't stop people from getting killed in bad earthquakes too. My sister had an officemate down in SoCal talking to her daughter on a cell phone next to her when it suddenly went out during the Bay area quake that took so many and she was one that got killed when the freeway collapsed on top of her in Oakland. One of my customers made the news as having the first baby born right during that earthquake too. Those quakes can be so devastating to so many. Having moved up here, I don't see people as conscious of the need to at least try to minimize the damage as much as possible. At least we can save a lot of people if we do things right, even if we still may lose a lot of people anyway. Having lived in both areas, I can see the different level of consciousness of these problems in both areas. I think that is probably factoring in a lot to what the writer is discussing here.

I think what will take out a hell of a lot of people is near the coastline where there's probably going to be a big huge tsunami coming from the coast off of Seattle, with basically no warning time to allow residents to evacuate safely. With that area so flat and not having a lot of high cliffs like so much of California coast line has especially near the mouth of the Columbia River, you are going to see far more people being killed by tsunamis when people without a helicopter or airplane they can get to quickly have no place to go.

lpbk2713

(42,766 posts)
3. If they are projecting fifty years ...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 01:31 AM
Jul 2015



it will probably be just as bad on the east coast in terms of devastation but due to a different cause. With rising sea levels if another Katrina or Sandy or Andrew hits a major coastal city the damage will be monumental. One saving grace may be that populations will be able to evacuate with the advance warning and there won't be as much loss of life. But with the right magnitude storm some cities may not be able to recover.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
15. I literally live on a faultline.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:54 AM
Jul 2015

I live in Portland, and I'm on the slope of the ridgeline formed by a faultline running through Forest Park, Washington Park, the Japanese Garden, etc. In a 100-year-old brick building, no less...

So yeah...pretty much fucked.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
17. My daughter in the S.F. Bay area is across the street from the San Andreas fault.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 12:03 PM
Jul 2015

It was scary things like that that made me decide 30 years ago to move out of S.F. and up to Oregon. Looks I moved for nothing!

Spirochete

(5,264 posts)
18. I'm about 3 miles east of I-5
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 12:18 PM
Jul 2015

Dunno if such a destructive force is going to say "well, here's the freeway - i dare not go any further..."

shanti

(21,675 posts)
23. it probably will depend
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:41 PM
Jul 2015

upon your proximity to waterways like rivers. there are so many rivers ending on the coastlines of the PNW. if there was a tsunami, would the water just go up each river? pretty sure it would go up the columbia, it's so huge! how terrifying would that be?

Spirochete

(5,264 posts)
29. Gak!
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:08 PM
Jul 2015

I'm about 3 miles north of the Columbia river, too. There is high ground in between it and me, though...

blindersoff

(258 posts)
33. I'm on the Olympic Peninsula
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:34 PM
Jul 2015

about 60 miles west of I-5. We'll be sucked down when the plate dives under... yikes

Berlin Expat

(950 posts)
12. Otisburg?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:43 AM
Jul 2015
It's just a little itty, bitty place.....

OTISBURG??

One of my favorite scenes - for me, Gene Hackman is my favorite Lex Luthor.
 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
9. Not sure I'm buying the 240-year thing re Seattle
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:58 AM
Jul 2015
http://m.livescience.com/22248-earthquake-records-pacific-northwest-cascadia.html

At the above link it says the "big one" involving the entire plate happens more like every 500 years on average, while the southern one (Oregon and Northern California) is the one that happens about every 240 years. So that would seem to suggest that Oregon is overdue, but not Washington. If I'm reading this correctly.
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
10. In SLC we're constantly under the threat of having the Big One...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:00 AM
Jul 2015

Ever since I was a kid - one that'll take over 2,000 lives and injure 500,000 or so. But as much as they keep saying it'll happen...it hasn't happened.

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
11. FWIW, there are reputable scientists saying the real risk is to the coast, not to Seattle itself.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:10 AM
Jul 2015

The "Seattle is toast" line could be hyperbole.

Still, I hope it goes another couple hundred years.

RandySF

(59,221 posts)
19. The tsunami will wipe the coast off of the map.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 02:46 PM
Jul 2015

And Seattle will sustain severe damage from the quake itself.

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
20. Again, the other experts differ with this guy on the amount of damage to Seattle.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jul 2015

We've always known that Seattle, like San Francisco, faces serious damage from a future earthquake.

Meanwhile, a top climate scientist has recently said the polar ice cap is melting, methane is being released, and the whole world is soup in just a few decades.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
13. Well, there's a big rock in the Azores...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:44 AM
Jul 2015

that if it falls will cause maybe a 200' tsunami, wiping out everything on the Atlantic coast. Or maybe not.

And there's always that Yellowstone caldera that's due to blow.

At any rate, there's no way we can protect ourselves from something like the Dekkan Traps, subduction zones, supervolcanoes
or comet hits that in the past have wiped out as much as 90% of life at the time.

Except for a few areas, we can't even build sensibly for expected problems, so I don't see worrying about the unexpected to be worth while.

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,588 posts)
30. My thoughts exactly.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:11 PM
Jul 2015

I can't prevent the 'quake and the only thing I can do is move to avoid it, and I ain't moving............. (I live 30 miles north of Seattle).

blindersoff

(258 posts)
34. Tsunami evacuation signs in our area
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jul 2015

on the Olympic Peninsula (WA). Hoping not to have to outrace the water from the Strait of Juan de Fuca. As it is, we will most likely be totally cut off from civilization...

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
16. Portland is split in half by I5 (I grew up there)
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:56 AM
Jul 2015

and the Bay Area - not mentioned - is far west of I5 (I live here now).

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
21. Read about that the other day, 3000 would be more like 60000
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 02:51 PM
Jul 2015

will be killed by the huge wall of water the quake will cause. All because people bury their head in the sand, because 'things cost money'. Yeah they do. Sorry.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
22. I've got a boatload of canned food, I'm storing water, candles, etc.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 02:56 PM
Jul 2015

But, at some point ... well, crap. What can you do but just cross your fingers.

Oneironaut

(5,524 posts)
26. And it might happen in the next couple thousand years!
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jul 2015

Prepare yourselves! You're all going to die (But probably of old age)!

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
27. I better tell my cousin
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:59 PM
Jul 2015

He's absolutely fed up with living near Las Vegas in the desert and is thinking of moving precisely there. I myself was thinking of joining him up there, as I am totally fed up with southern California.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
28. Earthquakes are scary.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:03 PM
Jul 2015

Being from Southern California and spending a year in Japan, I'm kinda used to them. I went through the big 6.7 Sylmar quake in '71(we were about 15 miles from the epicenter) which was really scary. And, a pretty big one in Japan.

Now in Washington and about 12 miles west of I-5.

There is no safety in the cosmos. Alan Watts

Hatchling

(2,323 posts)
31. shit.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jul 2015

I'm right between I-5 ad I-15. That means I will only get lightly toasted. I hope it holds on until I can move back to La Mesa. I'll only be warmed in the oven there. Who am I kidding: the whole county will be wrecked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Our operating assum...