Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 10:52 AM Jul 2015

The latest anti-choice move: Try to take custody of a woman’s fetus

JESSICA VALENTI, THE GUARDIAN
31 JUL 2015 AT 10:19 ET

ates have tried all sorts of things to prevent women from having abortions. They’ve enacted waiting periods, ultrasound laws and parental notifications. They’ve passed laws that force doctors to lie to women and force women to visit with ideological zealots . Some legislators have even attempted to make women get a man’s consent before obtaining the procedure – a paternalistic permission slip to access their legal rights.

But Alabama has brought efforts to restrict abortion to a whole new level, as the state tried this week to stop a woman from getting an abortion by terminating her parental rights… to her fetus.

District attorney Chris Connolly filed a petition to terminate an incarcerated woman’s parental rights for the sole purpose of stopping her from ending her pregnancy. The woman, known as Jane Doe, had filed a lawsuit in order to be granted a furlough to obtain the procedure. Connolly told a local paper , “Our position, if the termination for parental rights is granted, is that (she) would not have standing to obtain the abortion.” He’s arguing that Doe’s parental rights should be rescinded because she is facing charges of chemical endangerment of a child.

Alabama ACLU legal director Randall Marshall, one of the woman’s lawyers, told the Huffington Post that this is the first time the state has used these charges to try to prevent an abortion. “It appears to me that what the state is attempting to do is turn Jane Doe into a vessel, and control every aspect of her life,” he said.

If this dystopian Handmaid’s Tale nonsense wasn’t bad enough, Doe’s fetus was even appointed an attorney, thanks to a law passed in 2014 allowing such a move. (As The Daily Show’s brilliant Jessica Williams said to one such ‘fetal attorney ’: “You have a crazy-ass job, sir.”)

more
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/the-latest-anti-choice-move-try-to-take-custody-of-a-womans-fetus/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The latest anti-choice move: Try to take custody of a woman’s fetus (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2015 OP
Handmaid's Tale nt. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #1
If they sever her rights but leave "their" fetus in her body is it child abandonment? LeftyMom Jul 2015 #2
I keep hoping we play their silly game because we can beat them at it. Fawke Em Jul 2015 #3
Anti-choicers are getting into really strange and worrisome territory with these kind of laws Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2015 #4

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
2. If they sever her rights but leave "their" fetus in her body is it child abandonment?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:17 PM
Jul 2015

Surrogates get 20k or more for carrying a pregnancy, she should send them an invoice.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
3. I keep hoping we play their silly game because we can beat them at it.
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:33 PM
Jul 2015

I have said for years that women need to use the 13th Amendment against involuntary servitude to ensure abortions stay legal.

Involuntary servitude is a United States legal and constitutional term for a person laboring against that person's will to benefit another, under some form of coercion other than the worker's financial needs.

Think about it: a woman forced to carry a pregnancy she doesn't want is laboring against her will. She's effectively been made to use her body for someone else's ideology. Heck, giving birth is even called labor.

I like your idea. Sue them over child abandonment and make them take their fetus.

Very Solomon-like.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,436 posts)
4. Anti-choicers are getting into really strange and worrisome territory with these kind of laws
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:54 PM
Jul 2015

to say the least.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The latest anti-choice mo...