General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear White America: Your Toxic Masculinity is Killing You
Dear White America,
I am your friend. I have written several letters of this type to you before. It pains me to have to do so again. What I am going to share in this letter may be commonsense for many white brothers and sisters. Other White Americans may be surprised. Because our society is so segregated, people of color often do not have many opportunities to talk with white people in a direct way regarding our sincere worries about the problems in your community. I hope that this open letter can be part of a broader conversation in that regard.
When a person suffers from chronic pain they often find ways to compensate for it. Some people self-medicate with drugs or alcohol. Others develop the mental discipline necessary to compartmentalize their physical suffering. Others cocoon themselves in a bubble of denial. Because I am your friend, I am going to be honest with you. White America is suffering from a type of cancer. It is hurting you; it is killing your children; it is damaging families; it hurls shrapnel in many directions, maiming and otherwise bringing an end to the lives of those people who are unfortunate enough to be in its blast radius. If you want the truth, this is it: toxic white masculinity, and the backward right-wing politics which nurture and protect it, are hurting millions of you every year.
Snip//
Toxic white masculinity defaults to violence as a means of maintaining social and political control. It clings to guns as a symbol of real male identity. It fears women as equals; it lashes out at non-whites who are somehow stealing white mens jobs and power. Toxic white masculinity sees liberals, progressives, social justice, and feminism as enemies out of a fear that white masculinity will somehow be made obsolete or extinct. The dream worlds and paranoid fantasies of angry white men are distractions that look to some type of Other as the preeminent threat to Americas safety and security. The reality is of course, very different.
Snip//
In the Age of Obama, the Republican Party has found itself increasingly dysfunctional as its politics are seemingly unable to evolve beyond hate the black guy in the White House and anything that he proposes, however reasonable. In many ways the fetishistic embrace of guns, hostility to womens rights, Islamophobia, symbolic and overt racism against black people the policies and talking points of the contemporary Republican Party are toxic white masculinity as a campaign platform.Together with the alternate reality created by the right-wing media, the Republican Party has become so radicalized, breaking many of the standing norms of consensus politics in modern American politics, that it no longer functions as a responsible political organization.
Read More http://www.chaunceydevega.com/2015/08/dear-white-america-your-toxic.html#more
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)sheshe2
(83,786 posts)It's actually a good read and indeed describes The GOP, Tea party and Faux News to a T.
Check you the comments section, 1SBM.
betsuni
(25,537 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Me, as a woman? Not so much.
Chris Rock rants about Racism, but routinely shits on women of all races and couldn't care less.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Perhaps the admins will notice as well.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Quayblue
(1,045 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If you're mocking "Not all white people" that tends to lean towards "Yes, all white people." Perhaps you meant, "The Overwhelming Majority of White People" or even "A Scant Few White People" I don't know as smilies are more a tool of evasion than exposition.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Try to be helpful. What segment of white society/culture/race is responsible? All? Most? Around half? Some? A few?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)you want to do exactly what the #NotAll meme represents.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Not.
You deride "not all white people" which pretty much says "all white people" and when called on it you run away and hide behind smilies and "you don't want to be helpful."
So every time someone sees you being derisive of all white people you get blame them rather than have the backbone to actually explain what you mean. And then you get hostile and whiny about being asked to explain what you mean.
That epitomizes "not helpful."
Stop hiding behind memes and actually have the courage to say what you mean. If you're afraid to say it because it sounds really racist maybe the problem isn't with the people noting the fact that is sounds really racist.
Go ahead and say it. Is it all white people? An overwhelming majority? Half? Some? A few?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)exchange about these issues is rare with MOST white people, yes MOST.
Now, the masculinity issue is ALL males, to one degree or another.
If not all very close to all males.
Response to AllFieldsRequired (Reply #153)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)We do bear that responsibility. We have often failed to take it, and there is no excuse for that.
But do you really believe we can only be spurred to fight racism by using a formulation(#YESALLWHITEFOLKS)that implies that all of us are actively supporting the perpetuation of racism?
What would you think of #WhiteFolksAgainstWhitePrivilege as an alternative hashtag?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:13 PM - Edit history (1)
in a majority had moved, at some time in the last 250 right up to today, and had stood up and said, this black man, woman is my brother, sister and you must stop treating them as 2nd class citizens, racism would have been a manageable problem.
White people do not care about stopping racism because they don't want it stopped. To have it stop would mean everyone would truly be entitled to the goodies only a certain segment of this society has always enjoyed. Lord knows, that privilege cannot EVER be threatened by something as inconsequential, to a majority of white people, as racial equality and justice. It's not a complicated truth or is it able to be diminished as a generations old TRUTH, no matter how hard you try.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 16, 2015, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)
"if the shoe fits"........ and it seems to fit many, many, many of the "toxic" very well. There are a lot of shoes fitting actually, here and there .....
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Are you calling me a toxic white racist?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I never called you anything. You're the one...making accusations.......
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)The thread is about toxic racism. You were addressing me saying the shoe fits.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)That said...while it's absolutely right to call out racism in all forms, why is it important to you to seemingly indict every individual white person in the racist systen rather than focusing on the white power structure?
Yes, whites as a group have benefited and still benefit from racism...obviously...I think we all agree here on that...but how does it hell to imply that every individual white is somehow intentionally complicit in preserving racism? What harm does it do to at least accept that some of us are trying to resist and end "white skin privileges"?
It's not as if racism can be defeated or even effectively resisted through separatism. Majority support is needed for that prject to succeed.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)for 10 seconds that's all the time you would probably need to find a racist incident in amerikkka involving a POC and one of the toxic white male and female supremacists extolling the right of white dominance over POC. You're joking, right? I didn't think so.... Part of the OP showed up. excellent....
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)from upset that you could ever realize. I am Laughing at the twisting, turning, distraction and how people on here are making themselves victims because they cannot deal with the truth of one of the major cause of racism....white male need to asserts white supremacy and control over POC. They do this by killing, murdering, summarily executing, men women and children of color. I am LAUGHING...LOUD....... AT SOME OF THESE RESPONSES.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)copied from OP:
Toxic white masculinity defaults to violence as a means of maintaining social and political control. It clings to guns as a symbol of real male identity. It fears women as equals; it lashes out at non-whites who are somehow stealing white mens jobs and power. Toxic white masculinity sees liberals, progressives, social justice, and feminism as enemies out of a fear that white masculinity will somehow be made obsolete or extinct.
It's talking about the people "the Southern strategy" works with.
And I think 1SBM said "#notallwhitepeople" because threads like this get a bunch of replies saying "not all white people" often by people who obviously haven't read the article, not because it's about all white people. An article that says a problem exists in white America isn't saying that every individual white American has that problem. It only says that a problem exists somewhere in white America. A segmet of white America is like this, and it isn't just a few people, though I don't know the percentage. Maybe equal to the percentage of white people who like Donald Trump as a candidate.
But 1SBM seems to pick up alerts and hides easily, even when his posts aren't particularly controversial, so he can't freely reply.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 4, 2015, 11:46 AM - Edit history (1)
So which is it?
Is this article about all white people and in denial by saying "not all white people" (as your first reply to the OP would indicate) or is this article only about some white people (e.g., GOPers, RWers, and teapartiers)?
Hmmmm?
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)is in and of itself an illustration of the problem.
Not picking on you, many seem incapable of understanding why 1sB would say what he said in this context.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:53 PM - Edit history (1)
In one response he mocks white people who might say "not all white people"
But in response to complaints about the OP being too broad brushed and someone says its not about all white but about conservatives, he gives that response a +1 and "I couldn't have responded better"
Which is it? Since he isn't explaining the contradiction, I welcome your explanation of 1SB
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)And if you have the ability to see that from my perspective you might understand why the article is offensive.
Or maybe that's the point -- to offend white males. That would make sense.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Over time you develop a thick skin (that is why you see so few "#NoAllBlackPeople" or "#NotAllWomen" or "#NotAllHispanics/Latinos" posts. And take heart, and it should be relatively easy to develop, as beyond being "offended", is the only no ill-effect you are likely to experience.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)been offended all my life by the very toxic type people in the article. Dry your tears and move on, nothing to see here, move on.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)So maybe you need to move on.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)still trying to give orders, huh. Sorry I missed Tuesday...I've been busy this week with other things and not concerned with people who make themselves victims.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Enjoy this thread for all its worth.
stone space
(6,498 posts)He risked looking foolish by doing so, if nobody had followed thru and said it, and his post had been left just hanging there. (After all, they had fair warning!)
But somebody did.
Come on guys!
If folks would show just a little restraint when somebody anticipates what they are thinking and don't immediately validate the predictions in public, then the person making the prediction ends up looking silly, rather than the person proving the prediction to be a valid one.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Some prediction!
stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)I mean, it's guns and all and they look fairly monochromatic. But since the topic at hand is whether or not its "not all white people" what segment of white men suffer from sufficient quantities of Toxic White Masculinity to fear these "women as equals" particularly the "'real' male identity"?
So, if my previous interlocutor derides the idea of #NotAllWhitePeople what portion of white people are we talking about? All white people? An overwhelming majority? Around half? Not many?
Problems exist everywhere and that which is self-destructive seems to carry the hazards of being more immediate and lesser admitted.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I'm not sure of the percentage but I'm thinking it's less than half but more than "not many."
And yes, there are problems among all groups of people everywhere in the world. This article is just about one particular problem that exists among a segment of people in one particular group. There are other articles about other problems.
Response to gollygee (Reply #97)
Name removed Message auto-removed
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Enjoy your stay.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Does that qualify as "not all"?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)it's only talking about complaints that articles and/or posts should have to specify that something is not referring to all white people. That people will respond with "Not all white people!" If I say, "White people like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches," that doesn't mean that I've done a survey and every single white person likes PB&J. And this didn't even say "white people." It talked about "toxic white masculinity," which I've sometimes heard called hyper-masculinity, where people try to appear super masculine to hide some kind of anxiety or something. Whatever you call it, there's a certain type of masculinity that causes some dysfunction. I read downthread that people of color can have problems with certain types of masculinity too. I don't doubt that, but this article is about a type of masculinity some white people have that causes them to be racist and sometimes violently racist.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Oh, bull crap. Peddle that trash to someone dumb enough to buy it.
I gave 1SBM multiple opportunities to explain what he means. He has made dogged effort to avoid doing just that so specificity is not the issue. Specificity is the last thing these racist screeds masquerading as commentary want to delve in to because as soon as we start talking actual facts and stats the "we just want a conversation" crowd screams "SHUT-UP!"
Which is in no way contingent on skin color, see: Honor Killings, Female Genital Mutilation, drowning baby girls, machismo, bride burning etc. get rid of white male sexism and you're still going to have a world drowning in male sexism.
But wait. Just down-thread we're informed all those misogynist customs in other cultures are to blame because -- wait for it -- white colonialism! Apparently whites created and propagated misogyny across the globe and all other cultures were gender-egalitarian paradises until those dreaded white people showed up.
Why? Because it's race-baiting bull crap. It's the same sort of shallow hypocrisy that says, "Look at the mote in your eye" while ignoring the beam in its own eye.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)racial toxicity to you because it is evident you know exactly what 1SBM says and means and that's why you think someone has to explain to you why you are the way you are and are offended because of it. NO ONE owes you anything, anytime. But I understand privilege does really blind one to their own foibles.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If someone sarcastically/derisively says, "not all white people" the implication is "all white people." That is racist. It's just as racist as sarcastically claiming "not all Jews" or sarcastically claiming "not all Muslims" or sarcastically claiming "not all Hispanics" or sarcastically claiming "not all Asians."
I'm struck curious about the obsession over white racism as if other racism doesn't exist and should not be dealt with. What the hell is wrong with ending racism, period?
Ah yes, the privilege to be bridled with the sins of all racists for all time for no reason beyond sharing skin color.
Not to be confused with those who get to slander people with implications of racism just so they can whine their way out of actually having to defend their own comments. That is a privilege I would never embrace even if it were offered to me.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)digging your own hole. White racism is the cause of the major race problem in amerikkka. Period. Obsessed, no. Concerned, sometimes, that some racist pig will hate my color and try to kill me because of it, distinct possibility in this society. The only whining I am aware of is the self immolated victims who are offended by the truth of white racism. But they never surprise me. Always provide me with amusement to pass a few hours in a day.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)And that's wrong. It's an offense to humanity and God. All racism, wherever it is, whoever imposes.
The only thing that matters is judging people about who they are, not their skin color.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Come on...you can do better than that!
Don't you have any photos of Black folks with guns?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)In defense of white male ammosexuals.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=173403
But this thread is no more about women than the thread I linked to is about Black folks.
Just pointing out your usual MO, that's all.
It gets annoying after a while.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)In many instances throughout history it has been absolutely essential for them to do so in defense of themselves and their families and their rights. I recognize that in many episodes throughout history the threat to black Americans has arisen from racists who held positions of power in the government, i.e. judges, the police, etc and this condition is far too prevalent, even today. As such I believe it would be foolish in the extreme for blacks to disarm and now, more than ever, they should exercise their rights as codified in the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.
I recognize that the many stains on American history the Dred Scott decision sought to prevent African Americans from obtaining arms for fear of "insubordination" and policies such as "stop and frisk" have targeted African Americans to keep them disarmed. Such things fly in the face of the right to self defense.
I also unequivocally support women exercising their rights to self-defense. No woman has a duty to be disarmed when confronted by a violent attacker who more than likely possesses every advantage in physical strength.
I absolutely and unabashedly support the right to self defense and I recognize that people of color and women are more susceptible to the predations of the violent than other groups thus my support for their rights finds emphasis.
How about you?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)toxicity knows no gender boundary, neither does racism.....#notallwhitepeople show up, constantly, hence the saying....it's true, people get offended if told there are millions of racist, privileged whites who could give a damn less if race prejudice, lethal racist murders or systemic and institutional racism is ever solved.. Get over it, move on, move on, nothing to see here.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The white left pretty much agrees with the OP. While we have our flaws, we aren't the ones oppressing PoC.
TheBlackAdder
(28,208 posts)REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Over 16000 posts and this right wing troll still hasn't been picked up by MIRT?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:14 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This flagging thing is starting to get silly with the abusive use of its application.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alerting comment is more egregious than the comment that was alerted on.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert stalking
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)And -- thank you
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I think.....
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #102)
Name removed Message auto-removed
freshwest
(53,661 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)not a clue, never had one, never will. So transparent as to who ....represents whom.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 3, 2015, 09:15 PM - Edit history (1)
unless you want to argue that white men are significantly more violent then men of other races. There are numerous toxic sub-cultures in America, all with men at their center.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)Your gender shouldn't guide your behavior.
Every single race has violence prone members in it, none can be excluded or singled out by race or even gender.
It's more of an age distinction than a gender or race one.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Men are murderers almost ten times more often than women are.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls
Syzygy321
(583 posts)I heard that the local men's DV shelter needed more donations...
The sexual assault responders had arrested five college girls for gang rape...
...a female pimp was caught trafficking young men across the border for sex slavery
An armed woman carjacked an elderly couple in a Lexus...
A drunk female in her thirties got into a brawl over a parking spot and knifed the other driver...
...and a man was found dead alongside his three dead children, all shot by the abusive ex-girlfriend he had dared to run away from.
Happens every day!
Response to hack89 (Reply #2)
Go Vols This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Go Vols (Reply #13)
William769 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Dylann Roof turned his toxic white racist masculinity on a black church in Charleston. And John Houser a white, right-wing, conservative, Christian fundamentalist, an anti-feminist, woman-hating Nazi sympathizer directed his rage towards a movie theater in Lafayette last month, where he killed three people and wounded eight others.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)They outnumber mass shootings by an order of magnitude. What do they say about race and culture?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Guns are a plague on every community.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)the truth will overcome BS like this......
hack89
(39,171 posts)That white males are uniquely violent? Because we know that is not true.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)therefore lethally violent. Problem with that truth?
hack89
(39,171 posts)There are many leathally violent sub groups in America. White racists are one of them.
We are both right.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)except one can perpetrate wars based on lies......"Operation:Iraqi Freedom" was pretty violent I would say.
hack89
(39,171 posts)If another race was dominant in America we would not be any less likely to start wars based on lies.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)and one particular sub-group has ALWAYS led this government...and, in particular, when RW members of that sub group are leading our government, that usually means woe to the world. Our present POTUS hasn't initiated any wars. He has taken out alleged members of groups and civilians associated with those groups who are avowed enemies of the "american way of life". That's war that is precise and not killing millions of innocents in defense of the "american way of life" and oil.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)but I doubt that they commit 63% of all murders.
The author is really reaching to make a point.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Will you please post where that was said, I missed it. Thanks.
I know they said this.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that these mass killings aren't over drug territory or gang beefs, killings in the commission of another crime (e.g., robbery), or even specific beefs with specific parties (which account for, by far, the vast majority of the number of killing that people are referencing - without referring them, i.e., Black on Black killings) ... these mass killings are a/the expression of a (political) narrative.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Nailed it!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)but, it's a common tactic we all know, to distract from the article to personal offense and thusly it's about them, which is the truth. The article is about them.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)with, let's say 52 mass shootings a year and perhaps 20,000,000 white males in this country.
It seems like quite a stretch to smear 19,999,948 people because of the actions of 52 of us.
Does 99.99974% count as "not all white people"?
Seems to me like it oughta.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)single white males also. It's not just the fact that mass shooting kings come overwhelmingly from one subgroup.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)If white men are 31% of the US population, and women are statistically 0% of mass shooters, then one would expect white men to commit 62% of mass shootings. 63% is a rounding error.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The fundys never do, and neither do some here.
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)of gun violence. Before using sweeping generalizations to imply that the masculinity' (whatever that means) of white men is somehow more pathological or racist or toxic than that of other groups of men you should do more research. You might wish to start here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/2012/12/20/d006040c-4aea-11e2-b709-667035ff9029_story.html
http://shootingtracker.com/wiki/Mass_Shootings_in_2015
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)Hyper masculinity sucks and I am a white male.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)The rest is in the link.
Dylann Roof turned his toxic white racist masculinity on a black church in Charleston. And John Houser a white, right-wing, conservative, Christian fundamentalist, an anti-feminist, woman-hating Nazi sympathizer directed his rage towards a movie theater in Lafayette last month, where he killed three people and wounded eight others.
underahedgerow
(1,232 posts)that's causing havoc.
If you look into DOJ statistics, no one particular skin color has any dominance in their violence, only in how they're prosecuted for it.
Why are men so angry?
HFRN
(1,469 posts)as it's rude to do that me, same as it is to everyone else
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Do you eschew 'backward right-wing politics?'
If not, the OP does not apply to you.
Do you 'hate the black guy in the White House and anything that he proposes?'
If not, the OP does not apply to you.
Do you possess or promote a 'fetishistic embrace of guns, hostility to womens rights, Islamophobia, symbolic and overt racism?'
If not, the OP does not apply to you.
Going after rightwingers is a cherished passtime at DU so you should be excluded from feeling you are being singled out. No one is going to make an issue of your self-definition of a white male.
It's not a crime, nor is anyone blaming you for an accidental of birth into a demographic society calls 'white' and 'male.' You could be gay and still be born a white male.
There is no privilege in being born a minority. Aas far as being a 'friend' of anyone here, that is a word of encouragement from a member of the 'white race,' and not an insult to most white men.
I am a white female, and nothing on this board offends me because of my personal race and gender. In fact, I refer to myself as a CCWP (card carrying white person). You may call me that, because I am not ashamed of it.
Please, and I mean this in love, just think about who you really are, not what you fear is being said about you personally, so you won't be offended.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)"There is no privilege in being born a minority. Aas far as being a 'friend' of anyone here, that is a word of encouragement from a member of the 'white race,' and not an insult to most white men.
I am a white female, and nothing on this board offends me because of my personal race and gender. In fact, I refer to myself as a CCWP (card carrying white person). You may call me that, because I am not ashamed of it.
Please, and I mean this in love, just think about who you really are, not what you fear is being said about you personally, so you won't be offended."
Beautiful.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Its addressed to white america -- not conservative america.
The problem isn't toxic conservatism, but white male masculinity.
This essay is directed at all white males and not just some white males.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)that causes the violence that some white males perpetrate. So, no, it is not addressed to all white males, only those who seem to have a machismo problem and problems controlling their homicidal urges.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)This article is targeting that person. Sure there may be degrees but that doesn't exclude a white male from this accusation piece.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)What a silly thing to say. And it it reeks of homophobia.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)And I'm not sure how you can see what I wrote as homophobic. Gender and sexual orientation are two very different things.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 16, 2015, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)
about the toxicity of white males who want to maintain white supremacy, white privilege and white control over POC, men, women and children. And will murder/summarily execute, men women and children of color to maintain that illusion of control in their own sick, twisted worlds.
Response to freshwest (Reply #37)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to freshwest (Reply #37)
Name removed Message auto-removed
HFRN
(1,469 posts)(except for it being in English)
a particular group, to blame for everything
Get outta here with that crap.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)sheshe2
(83,786 posts)It is a take down of a dying breed of GOP and Baggers.
You must feel the hate of the GOP. Their right over us all. Article talks about how...
The GOP is scared shitless. They are very white extremely hateful and controlling. They hate women, they hate LGBT and PoC. They hate that they are losing power.
Census has it, we will no longer be a White America in 30 years. They are scared and I rejoice when we are the United States of all America.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)never.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine that happens quite often.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Some friend.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Racist OPs are finally being recognized as such and being publicly called out.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Thanks for posting it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Cited to the FBI reportage.
Do you see a difference between one person killing another person (and maybe others caught in the crossfire), because of an individualized beef or in the commission of anot her crime ... and one person going somewhere and indiscriminately shooting people in that place ... to make a public statement.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)for the individual killed. But in the latter situation, the cause of the death doesn't/didn't die with the individual killed.
Understand?
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)I'm SHOCKED!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)How is that blaming the victim?
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)You're saying that people who get murdered:
1) Did something to cause their own deaths
and
2) End the problem with their deaths.
WOW.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in the first set of situations, i.e., individualized beef or death as a part of another crime, the person killed was singled out ... if the victims weren't there, it is likely NO ONE would have dead; whereas, in the latter situation, they were killed because they were there ... if they had not been there, others still would have been killed.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)n/t
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)rather, I am discussing the motivation behind the killing.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)n/t
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)you will believe what you choose to believe.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)trying to help you see any truth...it's wasted effort, completely. Not worth the time, really.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)made by people on here who want to deny their culpability and/or responsibility to the full human race. They distract and diminish with skewed reports and numbers. Much amusement is gained from their twisting and turning.
William769
(55,147 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)It's obvious.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Amishman
(5,557 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Not racist.
Amishman
(5,557 posts)I have heard plenty of whites rant about other groups based on 'observations' and 'experiences'. Sometimes they will try to quote crime statistics or other out of context convenient facts to back it up. They are still smearing an entire group of people because of preconceived notions and skin color. Sounds a lot like the OP, and a lot like racism.
racism can come from any group towards any group, that is a lesson that sometimes is lost.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"That's racist!"
"No ... Racism is ..."
"That's not what my dictionary says"
"The understanding of racism and how it operates has been advanced since the 20th century ... Here is an update.
"Well ... We'll just have to agree to disagree."
Wait a month ... get filthy and repeat.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)His understanding of the issue is obvious with his closing remarks...
"White America, I end this open letter as I began it. I am your friend. I care deeply about your health and well-being. You can make a better way. But first, you must choose to do so."
That's really special.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)been addressed to the faults of black hyper masculinity from a white man, cries of 'racism' would reverberate for a thousand posts.
melman
(7,681 posts)The thread would have been locked almost instantly.
Syzygy321
(583 posts)anywhere. None in brown cultures. None among Asians and none in native cultures. Travel the world, and you will see that outside the white bastions of Europe and the English-speaking countries, women are men's equals - same freedoms, respect, and status - in beautiful cultures where men are not white, never violent, and utterly nontoxic.
C'mon girls! India, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Africa, Egypt, China, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Iraq, Laos, Bangladesh, North Korea, or Nigeria? So many feminist paradises to choose from, once ya ditch these toxic white dudes.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)A good read.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Quayblue
(1,045 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Or maybe not.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Looking for peaceful, nonwhite places to live where masculinity is peaceful.
Africa.... ah... the Middle Ea wait no........ Asia! As long as it's not Malaysia with their slave camps. Or China. No India or Pakistan either, not the way they treat women. Or any other Asian country that will execute me for possession of recreational drugs.
Damn u white men why u make the world so violent and evil!
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Famously the two African countries that resisted all attempts at colonialism by white men. The former did, you know the latter's history and why it wasn't colonized by whites.
Why didn't China learn from them? Hong Kong? Singapore?
Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #36)
Name removed Message auto-removed
snooper2
(30,151 posts)That shit never existed before the fucking assholes came over on ships!
Syzygy321
(583 posts)Forget genital mutilation - don't think I have forgotten how your colonizing forebears came into those peaceful egalitarian cultures and imposed
child marriage,
forced marriage,
forced polygyny,
forced female seclusion,
bride kidnapping,
honor killing,
forced veiling,
widow-burning,
widow-trying,
widow-inheriting,
Newborn-daughter-killing
Sex slavery
Women and girls as war booty
Females denied inheritance rights
Girls denied education
Male-only chiefdom
Male-only religious rites
Footbimding
menstruation taboos
Son-preference
and ten million other misogynist injustices that the non-white folks had to be taught.
We are clearly the most unjust place on earth, and white Republicans have created the most woman-hating culture on the planet.
Oops - gotta go to bed! Stayed up late kissing my boyfriend, writing a check to Planned Parenthood and the local women's shelter, doing no housework, and enjoying equal rights under US law. Come morning I will wear what I want and drive my car to my workplace where i have the respect of my colleagues - male and female - and where anyone who pinches my ass is gonna be fired. What a crap country this is!
***
And now, a final word, with no sarcasm beyond this point:.
You white males aren't perfect.
Almost all of you are apathetic toward the injustices and threat of violence that women live with every day.
Some of you are worse than merely apatheticc. And some minority of you are true resenters or haters of women. Some of you get your self-respect from insulting us, controlling us, raping us, killing us.
But as a whole, you have - in the past 50 years - given up a huge chunk of the privileges that used to come with being male (not always happily, but you did it ) You did it to create a more just America. And while you have a hella long way to go, i recognize ypur sacrifice and I appreciate your (often half-assed or clueless) efforts.
White American males: just this once, I salute you!
Syzygy321
(583 posts)If you actually think that India was a feminist paradise until those awful Brits came in and started burning widows alive...
or that Arabia was ruled by matriarchs until Lawrence of A. taught the local women they must be walled out of government and public life...
or that Confucius say "Wife and husband are equal" until Marco Polo imposed footbinding...
or that aboriginal women played the didgeridoo until white Aussies insisted it was taboo...
Heh heh. Okay.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Just bite me.
This shit is getting stale.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)You did not bother reading it either.
Sad that.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)The excerpts you posted were garbage.
Why waste my time?
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Ok.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)No not so much.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)The whole white race was mentioned? Really???? Not. I know. I read it. I am WHITE.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Unless someone is dumb/deceitful enough to suggest ending sexism amongst white males will end sexism every where I'm curious to know why the focus on white male sexism.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And yes, I saw the inevitable "3, 2, 1..." countdown at the top of the thread,many I've seen the disclaimers about how this only applies to the guilty. But that's not how it's worded. By all means, post this on a Republican site if you'd like. They won't listen, but they're in need of the message.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)You will see it trashes the GOP........
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If the piece had started, "Dear Republican men", no one would be saying a word.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Toxic white masculinity defaults to violence as a means of maintaining social and political control. It clings to guns as a symbol of real male identity. It fears women as equals; it lashes out at non-whites who are somehow stealing white mens jobs and power. Toxic white masculinity sees liberals, progressives, social justice, and feminism as enemies out of a fear that white masculinity will somehow be made obsolete or extinct.
So that's who it's about.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)GitRDun
(1,846 posts)but it is.
It's not just the politicians. It's my neighbors, regular people in my community.
The guy that towed my truck the other day made some unintelligible slur against Latinos & immigrants. We were having a perfectly normal conversation about how expensive college is and he blurbs something. If I had understood what he said I would have called him on it.
Within 24 hours, a friend of a friend made some rude FB comment on a post about a POC killed by a cop that amounted to "obey or die". I called him out. His excuse was his son in law is a cop in "the projects". That's the second friend of this friend I've called out on this topic.
We're a mixed community suburb. It's 2015 for heaven's sake! This is sadly what life is like here, at least in my mostly white community. I don't hang with people that think this way, but they are a part of my daily life.
To be honest, I don't really know what to do about it other than confront it when I see it...raised my kids to not think that way. I think we'll finally figure out it's not so bad once we are a minority. Likely, we won't be treated as badly as we treated minorities.
artislife
(9,497 posts)He is a 40ish something white tech guy. His wife is actually a German born naturalized American. He had just come back from buying an RV in CA bringing it back up to Seattle.
Somehow, he says he may look like a liberal but then laid into people asking for money on the side of the freeways. And how he had heard from liquor store cashiers that as soon as they make enough, they come in and buy a single malt liquor.
I am sitting here thinking, I need these clients. But where the hell did this come from. His wife said never to judge someone's situation. That why someone is there, you have no idea.
I remained quiet.
For about half an hour.
They kind of looked at me and asked me if I would give money knowing it was going to drink, probably. I said I would have to consider my motive. If it was charity, then whatever they did with the money was of no concern. If I wanted to control the person, I would tell them not to use it for drink.
They both kind of paused.
She loved the answer and he softened up. But he must be hearing sh*t that people are trying to take advantage of him and he isn't going to take it.
It is the nice ones that really disappoint.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)johnp3907
(3,731 posts)"If it was charity, then whatever they did with the money was of no concern. If I wanted to control the person, I would tell them not to use it for drink."
That's excellent!
artislife
(9,497 posts)Syzygy321
(583 posts)thinks the problems of misogyny, racism and militarism are specific to whites who are male who are American.
I look around the world and see racism in many places, whether in Hungary. australia or Ecuador. I see misogyny in most countries - and it is far worse in non-western countries (that is, non "white" ones): anyone here want to be a woman in Afghanistan or Sierra Leone? As for violence, I see it run amok from Mexico to the DR Congo to Pakistan.
The author seems to believe in some sort of American exceptionalism. A quick look around the world shows that there is nothing particularly exceptional about whiteness (as opposed to other-raceness) or Americanness (as opposed to anywhere-elseness).
The one defensible position (sorry guys) is the attack on maleness. All over the world, males do subjugate females to varying degrees. Black white or yalla, and American, Russian or Yemeni... that's one thing you can count on.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)You say toxic white masculinity is just about the GOP and tea parties but the author writes that white masculinity leads to or defaults to the conservative types. If you read his words you'd see that he is saying they are different things. The same thing can't lead to itself, logically.
It must be hard for you to realize how deeply flawed and bigoted this author is.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Chauncey DeVega and I usually see eye-to-eye.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)It's been awhile.
Thank you.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)K&R
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)It could probably be considered an example of what you speak.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)You're not supposed to point out that every single race/culture has asshole men who screw things up for everyone else!
Whites? Check.
Blacks? Check.
Latinos? Check.
Arabs? Check.
Native Americans? Check.
India Indians? Check.
Australian Aborigines? Check.
Eskimos? Check.
Easter Islanders? Check.
And right on down the line....
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Since we men collectively share the blame for all the bad stuff that's ever happened, then surely we collectively share in the credit for all the good stuff we have wrought!
Wait...it doesn't work that way???
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)The individual bad acts by a member of a subordinate sub-population are ascribed to the entire sub-population; while, the bad acts of a member of the dominate sub-population are individualized to THAT person.
And it works the other way, too ... The individual good acts of a member of a subordinate sub-population are individualized to THAT person; whereas, the good acts of a member of the dominate sub-population are ascribed to the entire dominate sub-population.
That is a facet of institutionalized bigotry (racism).
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)the 13th and 14th Amendments, Brown v Board of Education, the Civil Rights Acts, participating in civil rights protests, the Great Society programs, etc.?
To hear some tell it not only is it all white people but white people have imposed all sexism across the world and never made any positive contributions ever, anywhere at any time.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)When is not the case. Which, BTW, is what the #NotAll ... is,all about.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)people who are white complain about the fact the article makes unqualified blanket accusations based on nothing but skin color they are mocked with #NotAllWhitePeople.
Either the racist screed is meant apply to people who are white based on their skin color or it doesn't. If it is meant to assign collective guilt then people are entitled to take umbrage with blanket accusations for offenses they are not party to. If it doesn't apply to them then #NotAllWhitePeople is out of line because it mocks the truth in order to impose collective guilt where none exists.
You can complain "I'm not trying to impose collective guilt" yet so many are telling you "This sounds like collective guilt." The only rebuttal we haven't seen from the derisive use of #NotAllWhitePeople is "I'm not racist, I have white friends."
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)"Dear Black America" that would not be seen as an unqualified slur against all African Americans?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Based on your last to responses to me.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Only enough to make you
retrowire
(10,345 posts)this is more about male toxicity disorder than it is about race.
feminism is an equalizer. not a dominator. feminism is for helping women and men. to remove the ideas of toxic masculinity would aid us all.
Puddy
(51 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Just search DU for "Spider-Woman comic cover" or "moon bombing" or "fried chicken wars" and you will see some spectacular silliness that makes this look tame,though the chicken wars were in part a huge circle-troll in the name of humor that got out of hand. Spider Woman and the moon bombing being threads of particular distinction in terms of the utterly indescribable batshit, freeper-worthy insanity on display.
Chapter2
(1 post)There are approx. 330 million people in the USA. The percentages are going to have a fair amount with mental problems. Of those, most will not get the help they need. Do you really think a person just wants to be evil? Do you really think a person without mental defects would just stand up in a movie theater and shoot people? If you really want to write something about something that can make a difference, write about the lack of mental care that is available in the USA. Stop blaming race, culture or sexual orientation on all our issues.
Ace Rothstein
(3,163 posts)I've had enough of it.
romanic
(2,841 posts)Identity politics is ruining this board and liberalism.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Sick to death of it. And while these pointless fights are going on, neo-fascism continues happily towards its goals, snickering at the distracted people who could be actively opposing it instead of fighting these sideshows. Forest/trees.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)do they?
Please --- I've never heard women referred to as "bitches" anf 'hos' more than I have from minority men.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I see a lot of complaining in this thread by white people. When the article CLEARLY points out which white people it is refering to. Gee, bring up RIGHT WING DOMESTIC TERRORISTS and some here go bonkers with rage and anger. Why is that?
Wake
the
fuck
UP
PEOPLE!
Some of the replies in here are cringe worthy and they obviously did NOT read the article.
Response to Rex (Reply #134)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Rex
(65,616 posts)Enjoy your stay!
Response to Rex (Reply #138)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Rex
(65,616 posts)Maybe third time is a charm!? I LOVE watching RWing morons like yourself makes excuses for white domestic terrorists...which are just one shade away from being like ISIS.
Are you one of them? A stupid RWinger that loves his guns and is scared of the dark?
Anyway...keep trying and I am glad you are so pissed off that I am SPOT on about your kind.
Response to Rex (Reply #141)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Your images are spot on. I thank you for that and for reading the article, where others did not.
have a great day
Rex
(65,616 posts)Looks like I have a RWinger crybabying all about it! You would think they could find something productive to do.
Have a great day sheshe2!
I see name removed is back to posting again. They never give up...
Gotta run~
Ilios Meows
(26 posts)And you obviously struck a nerve with someone.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:32 PM - Edit history (1)
And I do not believe Chauncey cares an iota for white people given his bigotry.
Rex
(65,616 posts)"Toxic white masculinity defaults to violence as a means of maintaining social and political control. It clings to guns as a symbol of real male identity. It fears women as equals; it lashes out at non-whites who are somehow stealing white mens jobs and power. Toxic white masculinity sees liberals, progressives, social justice, and feminism as enemies out of a fear that white masculinity will somehow be made obsolete or extinct. The dream worlds and paranoid fantasies of angry white men are distractions that look to some type of Other as the preeminent threat to Americas safety and security. The reality is of course, very different."
"In reality, right-wing domestic terrorists and mass shooters are the number one threat to Americas safety and security since September 11, 2001."
That sure seems to be a problem for some here.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)...blah, blah, blah...
Would you agree?
Rex
(65,616 posts)You of course have no leg to stand on here so now you just have to try and make stuff up. SORRY, if an article about WHITE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS bothers you so much...maybe you need to do some self reflection.
romanic
(2,841 posts)But I don't think being "masculine" is toxic; it seems like the article is talking more about ego and machismo (masculine pride) within the Republican party and the white guys it caters too. Just my take on it.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)pecwae
(8,021 posts)Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)in the African American community. Someone thought they were being cute writing a similar thread to yours Sheshe. I got offended as hell on that one and they think it's funny. God the insensitivity of some people.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)I worked til 10, so I haven't seen it. Would you PM me a link?
It's getting late and I have to go soon.
Thanks, so good to see here.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Just found it, going back to read it.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)It's okay, the poster is doing a parody. Someone did make the comment of what if? So they posted their own response. When you sit back and read it twice you will see that.
I trust BainsBane and JustAnotherGen implicitly. Bains is an ally and JAG, AA.
Even the Op, I have liked what I have seen from them so far.
Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)but given the current state of race relations today I did not find it funny at all. That thread really offended me. I don't mind humor but joking about it like the way it was written like I said that offended me. Good to see you Sheshe, missed you
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)as it would have been more specific about which whites it was addressing. However, that could easily have been misinterpreted as calling all white Americans racist and violent.
While I doubt that anyone DeVega is describing will take this to heart and change their ways, he was spot on in his diagnosis of their illness, and it may help others understand the gravity of the situation. And he gives one of the best characterizations of the modern Republican party I've see in the last paragraph your excerpted in the OP.
Also, he included links to some other great articles. I thought one of the best was his own Salon article. in which he says:
Experts in political communication and media have described the denseness of ties, shared links, and the alternate reality created in the right-wing media (both traditional and digital) as exhibiting a condition of epistemic closure. What that means is this: Because contemporary conservatism has created a bizarre and twisted reality for those who consume its news media and other information sources, a state of extreme political polarization has been created. If citizens cannot come to agreement about basic facts, they are crippled in their ability to solve common problems of shared public concern. This crisis is made even more acute by how recent research has demonstrated that those people who listen to Fox News and other right-wing media outlets are more likely to hold erroneous beliefs about the nature of political and social reality. In essence, Fox News is not newsit functions as an organized disinformation campaign that propagandizes its followers into accepting right-wing lies and distortions as empirical fact.
~Snip~
In The Paranoid Style in American Politics, historian Richard Hofstader famously wrote about the dangers posed by such an impenetrable bubble. Hofstadters essay was published during the 1950s, at the conclusion of McCarthys witch hunt, at the dawn of an ideological revolution that would manifest, in the short term, in movements such as the John Birch Society, and culminate decades later in the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Now, in the age of Obama, this paranoid style has been mainstreamed and amplified by the 24/7 cable news cycle, the power of instantaneous communication offered by digital media, and a weak fourth estate that treats all ideashowever absurd, without empirical merit, or unmoored from realityas facts to be debated and discussed.
With that DeVega clearly illustrates one of the most significant obstacles to actualizing real social and economic justice in this country. If the left wing can figure out how to exorcize that demon, America might just fulfill its promise.
Syzygy321
(583 posts)is lumped next to "Islamophobia."
If you believe women and men should have the same rights and responsibilities and be governed by the same laws,
you certainly SHOULD be phobic toward any religious-legal ideology that teaches (and enforces) rigid sex roles and a male-over-female hierarchy to vast numbers of people.
Especially as hardly any of those people are free to reject the roles thrust upon them, or the religion thrust into them.
Hatred of misogyny and religious coercion is not "toxic".
Kowtowing to religious dogma is not liberal.
Criticizing religion is neither bigotry nor blasphemy.
Yelling "Islamophobes!" at those who criticize Islam - while also yelling "misogynists!" at those who cheer the Christian right - is too silly for words.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)white heterosexual toxic affliction?
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)white conservatives and white liberals?
There's a reason there are liberals who happen to be white and that is because they don't, and in many cases, have never bought into the kind of racist and misogynist thinking all white people are periodically accused of on this board.
White liberals do not deserve to be insensitively and invisibly lumped in with right wing racists and misogynists. There is a reason - often many good reasons - they have chosen to be politically left.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:51 PM - Edit history (1)
description of racial dysfunction in the privileged communities of america. Thank you for this. I couldn't have said it better...damn good!!!!!!
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)Thank you and