Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Walker is America’s biggest hypocrite-The “fiscal conservative” is giving $450 million to we
TWEET:
Scott Walker is Americas biggest hypocrite-The fiscal conservative is giving $450 million to wealthy sports owners http://www.salon.com/2015/08/11/scott_walker_is_americas_biggest_hypocrite_the_fiscal_conservative_is_giving_450_million_to_wealthy_sports_owners/
View summary
Tuesday, Aug 11, 2015 04:58 AM CST
Scott Walker is Americas biggest hypocrite: The fiscal conservative is giving $450 million to wealthy sports owners
As Walker attempts to win the hearts of "small government conservatives," there's something they should know
David Dayen
Scott Walker is America's biggest hypocrite: The "fiscal conservative" is giving $450 million to wealthy sports owners
Scott Walker (Credit: AP/John Minchillo)
Tomorrow, Scott Walker will stand on a stage at State Fair Park in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and betray virtually every conservative economic principle there is by handing out up to $450 million in taxpayer money to wealthy sports owners to pay for private infrastructure at a time when public infrastructure is crumbling.
The massive sum will go toward the building of a new sports arena for the Milwaukee Bucks basketball franchise, pleasing the teams billionaire hedge-fund-manager owners, who threatened to move the team if they werent given taxpayer tribute. Conservatives in recent years have feigned concern about corporate welfare, and this deal is really the ultimate expression of it: hundreds of millions of dollars from teachers, waitresses, factory workers and shop owners funneled to pay for an aristocrats show palace rather than needed public service.
.....................
We dont upgrade anything in this country after 27 years. There are pipes carrying water to homes that date back to the 19th century. In Milwaukee, in fact, hundreds of those pipes burst at a record pace in 2014 due to the cold weather. Seventy-one percent of Wisconsin roads are in mediocre or poor condition, and fourteen percent of its bridges are structurally unsound. If you wanted to prioritize infrastructure projects needing attention in the Badger State, replacing the arena we built in the late 1980s would fall down the list, somewhere below make sure the thing Wisconsinites are riding on in cars doesnt crash to the ground.
................ Lasry and Edens are worth around $2 billion each, but under the purchasing agreement they would only put up $150 million for the arena, with Kohl kicking in another $100 million. The rest would come from city, county and state taxpayers.
The usual discredited arguments propped up this deal. Wisconsin lawmakers promised great economic benefits from a new downtown arena. Walker said repeatedly it would be cheaper to keep the Bucks in Wisconsin than to lose them to some other city. This ignores the fact that the alternate universe where Wisconsinites dont have a Bucks game to attend in April is not necessarily to sit in their homes and contemplate the darkness of existence. Theyd maybe go out to dinner, with the economic activity simply substituted.
Numerous studies have shown no economic benefits to building a new stadium; its just something rich people say to get someone else to pay for the construction. Seattle is not a deserted wasteland because they lost the SuperSonics in 2008. Theyre doing okay...........
http://college.holycross.edu/RePEc/spe/BaadeBaumannMatheson_Strikes.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 549 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Walker is America’s biggest hypocrite-The “fiscal conservative” is giving $450 million to we (Original Post)
riversedge
Aug 2015
OP
ProfessorGAC
(65,213 posts)1. No Economic Benefit
While i agree the owners should pay for the own stadia, there is something a bit misleading in that statement.
It's been proven that there is no long term ADDED economic benefit for building a new stadium. So, what it really amounts to is avoidance of losing the business base the team represents and the tax dollars and personal income for the people who work at, around, and for the facility.
In effect, an owner insisting on "help" for a new stadium is extorting money by threatening to do economic damage if he/she doesn't get their way.
So, there is an economic benefit, only in a bad way that ultimately is not a net benefit to the community, only the avoidance of a net loss.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. He wants America to look like WI
Me personally will vote against the insane GOP.