General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAl Franken: Why I support Iran deal
After careful review, I have decided that I will vote in support of the agreement the United States and our international partners reached with Iran last month.
It's not a conclusion I came to lightly. Since the deal was announced, I've consulted with nuclear and sanctions experts inside and outside government; Obama administration officials, including Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz; ambassadors from the other countries that negotiated alongside us; advocates for Israel on both sides of the issue; my constituents in Minnesota; and, of course, my colleagues in the Senate.
Many have expressed reservations about the deal, and I share some of those reservations. It isn't a perfect agreement.
But it is a strong one. This agreement is, in my opinion, the most effective, realistic way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon anytime in the next 15 years. It does so by imposing a series of physical limits on Iran's nuclear program, especially its production of the fissile material it would require to make a bomb. The agreement's verification provisions are extremely strong: 24/7 monitoring of, and unfettered access to, Iran's nuclear sites and ongoing surveillance of Iran's nuclear supply chain.
That means: In order to make a nuclear weapon in the next 15 years, Iran would have to reconstruct every individual piece of the chain -- the mining, the milling, the production of centrifuges, and more -- separately and in secret. The regime would have to run the risk of any of these steps being detected by international inspectors or our own comprehensive intelligence efforts. It would risk losing everything it gained from the deal, and the re-imposition of sanctions.
Full article: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/13/opinions/franken-iran-deal/index.html
underpants
(182,951 posts)lamp_shade
(14,847 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)sarisataka
(18,821 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Seems a nice summation of the GOP position on everything!
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I haven't heard too many specific counterarguments, except for more sanctions and some vague yammering about a better deal. The other counterargument is to blast Iran to kingdom come, but of course we can do that anytime we want. It's just that if we go ahead and do that, we've sort of run out of options after that. And I think too many people still remember how Afghanistan and Iraq have turned out, so getting support for the "kill 'em all" option will be rough going.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)XRubicon
(2,212 posts)A true statesman.
the_sly_pig
(741 posts)Jeb Bartlet
(141 posts)My Senator makes me proud.
Thanks for posting