Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 05:42 PM Aug 2015

Maureen Dowd Explains Defending Trump's 'Blood' Remark: 'I Believe Him'

-snip-

Trump found an unexpected defender on Sunday when Dowd, the Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist, published an interview with him that touched, among other things, on his comments about women. Tucked near the bottom of the piece, Dowd briefly mentioned that she didn't think Trump was referring to Kelly's menstrual cycle with his "blood" remark.

"I don’t think he meant it that way," Dowd wrote in her column.

Dowd left it at that in the column. So on Monday, TPM asked her by email if she'd be willing to expand on her thought.

Here is her full emailed response:

I don't think that's where Trump was headed. I believe him when he says that he was going to say something about her nose or ears next, and then suddenly realized he should probably drop it. He used the same image about a man -- Chris Wallace -- in the same interview with Don Lemon, saying "there was blood pouring out of his eyes, too."

I told him during our interview that I did not think he should have been attacking Kelly with gory imagery for asking appropriately tough questions during a debate.

You can never get into someone's head and know for sure. It's just my impression from covering his various forays into politics.


-snip-

full article:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/maureen-dowd-donald-trump-believe-blood
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maureen Dowd Explains Defending Trump's 'Blood' Remark: 'I Believe Him' (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2015 OP
I think we've had just about enough from Maureen Dowd, thank you very much... CTyankee Aug 2015 #1
I'm sure she'll cut Hillary the same amount of slack. geek tragedy Aug 2015 #2
yeah about the same time dsc Aug 2015 #3
LOL mcar Aug 2015 #6
If it was proven that she got paid for writing such trash TexasProgresive Aug 2015 #4
Further proof of Dowd's stupidity and gullibility. Paladin Aug 2015 #5
she would.....and her 'impression' means nothing to me spanone Aug 2015 #7

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
1. I think we've had just about enough from Maureen Dowd, thank you very much...
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 05:45 PM
Aug 2015

(not you, the story). She is completely untrustworthy. I would not believe her assessment of anything. So I discount anything and everything she says these days. All she ever wanted to do in life was attack Bill and HIllary Clinton during his presidency. Her credibility is SHOT, AFAIC.

dsc

(52,164 posts)
3. yeah about the same time
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 06:27 PM
Aug 2015

I climb Mount Everest, win the Boston Marathon, while holding a winning lotto ticket in my teeth.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
4. If it was proven that she got paid for writing such trash
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 07:20 PM
Aug 2015

would that make her (Maureen Dowd) a media -----? I think that fits for Flush, Slanthead and O'Lyllie as well.

spanone

(135,846 posts)
7. she would.....and her 'impression' means nothing to me
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 07:39 PM
Aug 2015

wouldn't be surprised a bit if murdoch ended up with the nytimes......

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maureen Dowd Explains Def...