Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 11:30 AM Aug 2015

WP: Don’t gloat about the Ashley Madison leak. It’s about way more than infidelity.

But the Internet soon turned its ire on other suspected Ashley Madison members, such as university professors and other “SJWs,” a derogatory acronym for “social justice warriors,” or people who speak out publicly against discrimination.


Computer security expert Graham Cluley quickly warned against such witch hunts on his blog.

“For one thing, being a member of a dating site, even a somewhat seedy one like Ashley Madison, is no evidence that you have cheated on your partner,” he wrote. “You might have joined the site years before when you were single and be shocked that they still have your details in their database, or you might have joined the site out of curiosity or for a laugh … never seriously planning to take things any further.”


Ashley Madison’s Korean Web site is shown on a computer screen in Seoul. (Lee Jin-man/AP)
You might be a journalist who joined to write about Ashley Madison, for example. Or, as some self-described Ashley Madison users have said on Reddit, you may be in an open marriage.

“But more importantly than all of that, if your e-mail address is in the Ashley Madison database it means nothing,” Cluley wrote. “The owner of that e-mail address may never have even visited the Ashley Madison site.”


Linkage

So many casting stones around here in the other thread with a sense of superiority. There's far more to it than that in the end, especially if you care about internet privacy - even if you don't believe such a thing exists.

It's all fun and games until it happens to you. Maybe OKCupid will be next and it'll tear down a whole other group of folks. Or Amazon. Or folks who buy stuff from lingerie/sex toy stores.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP: Don’t gloat about the Ashley Madison leak. It’s about way more than infidelity. (Original Post) Blue_Adept Aug 2015 OP
In combination with the breach of US gov. employee data, it's a real problem jberryhill Aug 2015 #1
You have that right Android3.14 Aug 2015 #2
Thanks, but I think I will gloat about Josh Duggar ~nt~ b.durruti Aug 2015 #3
Why would you join if you were single? Sheldon Cooper Aug 2015 #4
Some people don't want an actual relationship kcr Aug 2015 #5
There was a time you had to be in college to be on Facebook ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2015 #6
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
1. In combination with the breach of US gov. employee data, it's a real problem
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 11:44 AM
Aug 2015

Once all the chuckling dies down, it will sink in that the Chinese are matching up the email addresses with their database of US government employees, in order to find targets to compromise.
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
2. You have that right
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 11:45 AM
Aug 2015

"It's all fun and games until it happens to you."

Until we get corporations out of our politics, there will never be true protections for privacy.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
4. Why would you join if you were single?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 07:06 PM
Aug 2015

I thought the Ashley Madison site was for the express purpose of married people having affairs. If you're single, there are tons of dating websites you could join.

And if you're a journalist researching a story, I'm sure you can document your membership for work purposes. And if you're in an open marriage, I'm sure your spouse can verify this.

I suppose you could join up just for shits and giggles, but that's really kinda weird.

kcr

(15,320 posts)
5. Some people don't want an actual relationship
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 07:12 PM
Aug 2015

so they target attached partners. They like the attention married partners give them without all the boring, day to day stuff in a real relationship. They'd drop them in a hot minute if the partner left their spouses for them and it got real.

I agree. The people who join for other reasons generally aren't going to be worried about it, so it's silly to use that as an argument.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
6. There was a time you had to be in college to be on Facebook
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 07:15 PM
Aug 2015

These things morph and explode.

The original idea (from when it was an advertiser on the Howard Stern show) was that two married people would have an equal amount to lose, and therefore it would eliminate blackmail, emotional or otherwise.

I have a friend who signed up because he likes older women and he's single. So the rules have kind of eroded I guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WP: Don’t gloat about the...