Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:34 PM Aug 2015

The parallel split in the Republican party

(Be warned: "First Things" is a paleocon magazine put out by IRPL that wants to increase the role of Christianity in American public life. But it can be good to know what they are thinking.)

http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/08/the-republican-establishment-and-trump-hubris-and-nemesis

The asymmetry of criticism aimed at social conservatives vs. business interests implied that social conservatives should speak more softly and be happy with what (if anything) they get. Also, they should continue to vote Republican for some reason or another.

The autopsy's immigration approach managed to alienate populist conservatives and Republican-leaning, working-class whites who opposed upfront legalization. All this for a combination of immigration policies that are supported by perhaps one-third of the American public. No matter. The immigration policies had the support of the donor class, and Republican elites find it distasteful to advance conservative social policies—even when it is politically advantageous.

At the state level, Republican officeholders have been able to pass abortion bans and restrict funds to Planned Parenthood. But at the federal level, Republicans have given social conservatives plenty of reasons for skepticism. An attempt by the House of Representatives to pass an overwhelmingly popular ban on late-term abortion was temporarily scrapped when some House Republicans came to the horrible realization that they might actually have to follow through on their campaign promises. (A version of the bill eventually passed the House.) Ohio governor John Kasich (a standby candidate of the Republican establishment) made it clear that he believed Republicans talked too much about abortion. This would come as something of a surprise to pro-lifers who remember the Romney general election campaign. Abortion was mentioned in one sentence of Romney's Republican National Convention speech. Apparently, that is too much for some people.

The Republican establishment has gone much farther in alienating voters on immigration policy. A majority of Senate Republicans voted for upfront legalization and increased low-skill immigration, but that only tells part of the story. If you want to know why Republican poll respondents seem willing to make fools of themselves by supporting Trump, you should look at how the Republican party's establishment candidates have tried to make fools of Republican voters.


Anyways, just thought a view from the disaffected part of the other tent might be interesting to think about.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The parallel split in the...