Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:24 PM Aug 2015

California boy banned from wearing rosary at school

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-boy-banned-from-wearing-rosary-at-6457522.php

A Central California boy has been banned from displaying a rosary around his neck because it's a violation of the school district's dress code.

KFSN reports (http://abc30.tv/1HZDDgq ) Friday that third-grader Estevan A. Campos says the gift from his grandmother makes him feel safe.

On Tuesday, he says, the principal at Belleview Elementary pulled him aside and told him, he's not allowed to display it on campus....

The father says he was told his son couldn't wear the rosary because it's "gang affiliated," the station reported.


No religious bigotry, just gang-related weirdness (some schools out here do not allow pink clothing because "it's a shade of red"!). Nevertheless, cue Bill Donohue's poutrage in 3... 2... 1...
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California boy banned from wearing rosary at school (Original Post) KamaAina Aug 2015 OP
They wouldn't let us wear them at catholic school, either. Iggo Aug 2015 #1
You can see the brainwashing at work. Children are taught there are invisible people in sky randys1 Aug 2015 #2
Your avatar was a Muslim, he grew up and still believed it. Do you feel sad for him? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #23
Boom! Drop the mic, and walk away. 11 Bravo Aug 2015 #24
Lol Quackers Aug 2015 #25
Sounds to me more like a good luck charm loyalsister Aug 2015 #31
When I was a kid in the 1960s, many Catholic kids aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2015 #3
Not okay. I can't understand why this is should be an issue, he's a 3rd grader. ellisonz Aug 2015 #4
Sorry to tell you this... Xithras Aug 2015 #27
I've been working in community outreach in South Los Angeles. ellisonz Aug 2015 #29
I think individual expresssion of religious devotion is perfectly fine. Maedhros Aug 2015 #5
Again, nothing religious about this KamaAina Aug 2015 #7
.... left-of-center2012 Aug 2015 #14
Of course. [n/t] Maedhros Aug 2015 #17
I do and I don't Warpy Aug 2015 #19
If jewelry is not allowed all together fine. WDIM Aug 2015 #6
I thought one wasn't supposed to actually wear a rosary anyways. Hong Kong Cavalier Aug 2015 #8
I was told the same thing. appal_jack Aug 2015 #9
It's a big difference between US and Mexican Catholic culture TacoD Aug 2015 #12
I did not know that. Thanks for the information. Hong Kong Cavalier Aug 2015 #13
Mythology needs some international forums so they can define standards snooper2 Aug 2015 #15
LOL...no shit. Iggo Aug 2015 #18
So there is a possibility the ban was racist ? dixiegrrrrl Aug 2015 #21
You are right: they are not to be worn. They are a devotional device. CurtEastPoint Aug 2015 #16
They often aren't actually used as rosaries anyway. Xithras Aug 2015 #28
Why lift the rules for this kid? nlkennedy Aug 2015 #10
I'm an atheist of long standing hifiguy Aug 2015 #11
Ok if all neckwear is prohibited. roody Aug 2015 #20
Not just neckwear, all religious symbols sub.theory Aug 2015 #22
As a first grade teacher, I like the idea roody Aug 2015 #38
What, the magic doesn't work if it's in his pocket? randome Aug 2015 #26
The only person I knew who "wore" a rosary as a fashion statement was MADONNA. MADem Aug 2015 #30
quid pro quo DustyJoe Aug 2015 #32
One argument I have used for separation of church and state loyalsister Aug 2015 #33
A lucky Confederate flag? KamaAina Aug 2015 #34
I wouldn't put it past some fools I have known loyalsister Aug 2015 #36
Rosaries are NOT jewelry SoCalDem Aug 2015 #35
Gang affiliated? mmonk Aug 2015 #37

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. You can see the brainwashing at work. Children are taught there are invisible people in sky
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:37 PM
Aug 2015

watching them.

Then they grow up and still believe it, sad.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
31. Sounds to me more like a good luck charm
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:17 PM
Aug 2015

The only way I see this as different from a lucky pen or something that gives a kid confidence when taking a test, is that it's more important for a kid to feel safe.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
3. When I was a kid in the 1960s, many Catholic kids
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:37 PM
Aug 2015

including me wore devotional scapulars around the neck. They're very light, lie flat, and don't show under clothing. The only place you would see them was at gym class and no one ever said anything.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
27. Sorry to tell you this...
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 03:42 PM
Aug 2015

I live in Central California, and my wife is a kindergarten teacher. Every single year she has at least one kid in her class throwing gang signs and declaring that they're in this gang or that gang. When it first started happening, she thought it was just kids playing around, but she's realized over the years that it's a bit darker than that. They are almost always the kids of gang members who are simply emulating the behaviors of the adults they're seeing at home. Last year she had a kid who came to school every day for weeks with some fairly well done "tattoos" done in permanent Sharpie, that were clearly identifying the kid as a Suereno. She later found out that both his dad and his older brother were hardcore Suerenos and that they were drawing the Sharpie tats because "the ones he did himself looked stupid". The kid was suspended and his parents were told to keep him home until he could come to school without the gang markings. She never saw him again.

Her school has had first and second graders get in gang fights on the playground, because one kid will throw a Norteno sign and some other kid will throw a Suereno sign back at him. They've been told, their entire lives, that when someone does that to you, the proper response is to beat them down.

I'm sorry but "he's a 3rd grader" doesn't mean much of anything anymore.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
29. I've been working in community outreach in South Los Angeles.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 03:56 PM
Aug 2015

Your observed incidents don't change the fact that this is a child. It sounds like her school could really use an effective social worker.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
5. I think individual expresssion of religious devotion is perfectly fine.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:47 PM
Aug 2015

I do not agree with the school in this instance.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
7. Again, nothing religious about this
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:48 PM
Aug 2015

The administrators somehow got it in their pointy heads that gang members (in third grade?!) use rosaries as symbols. You know, like Beyonce's hand gestures.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
19. I do and I don't
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:36 PM
Aug 2015

I agree the kid should be allowed to wear it inside his shirt. I don't agree that he should wear it outside his shirt where it can be grabbed or caught in things.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
6. If jewelry is not allowed all together fine.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:48 PM
Aug 2015

Really i can see the argument against letting third graders wear jewelry to school so no one should be allowed to wear it but if it is just because it is a rosary then that is not reasonable.

Hong Kong Cavalier

(4,573 posts)
8. I thought one wasn't supposed to actually wear a rosary anyways.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:49 PM
Aug 2015

It's a set of prayer beads, not a necklace. At least that's what my Catholic mother told me.

(Not the point, I know. I do think the school overstepped their bounds a bit here.)

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
9. I was told the same thing.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:02 PM
Aug 2015

Always seemed rather necklace-shaped to me though. Hardly the biggest contradiction that occurred to this ex-Catholic on my long (and doubtlessly incomplete) journey toward agnostic reason & liberty, but still...



-app

TacoD

(581 posts)
12. It's a big difference between US and Mexican Catholic culture
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:08 PM
Aug 2015

in Mexican Catholic culture, wearing the rosary as a necklace is very common, while in the US it's frowned upon.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
21. So there is a possibility the ban was racist ?
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:53 PM
Aug 2015

The kid is Latino....and doing something normal for his culture.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
28. They often aren't actually used as rosaries anyway.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 03:51 PM
Aug 2015

The Central California gangs use them as identifiers. The color of the beads identifies your major gang affiliation. Patterns in the beads identify the specific gang you belong to. A rosary with blue beads indicates that the wearer is a Suereno. A pattern of 1-3-1 with darker beads might indicate that the wearer is a member of ESM, which is a particular gang within the Suerenos.

The rosary itself has no religious value for the wearer. It's simply a newer version of the bandana hanging out of the pocket.

nlkennedy

(60 posts)
10. Why lift the rules for this kid?
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:05 PM
Aug 2015

Policy is policy, just because he belongs to the popular cult doesn't mean he should get special treatment.

They're children. If we can't uphold a basic policy against them, then it's no wonder we're a half decade away from major fascist secession...

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
11. I'm an atheist of long standing
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:05 PM
Aug 2015

and I think this is a dumb rule.

"Gang affiliated?" A rosary? What gang? Maybe this one?



OK, The Bishop is C of E, but still...;
)

sub.theory

(652 posts)
22. Not just neckwear, all religious symbols
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 02:21 PM
Aug 2015

Neckwear isn't the issue. It's religious symbolism, which is first amendment protected. If everyone is equally forbidden from any religious symbolism then it may be defensible as equal protection. Otherwise it is clearly a violation of this student's constitutional rights. It must be completely uniform.

roody

(10,849 posts)
38. As a first grade teacher, I like the idea
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:13 AM
Aug 2015

of no neckwear. I would not impede a religious symbol as long as it does not disrupt learning. I believe in self expression.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
26. What, the magic doesn't work if it's in his pocket?
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 03:21 PM
Aug 2015

I doubt a 3rd grader will be scarred by this. His parents might scar him by trying to make this into a big deal, however.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. The only person I knew who "wore" a rosary as a fashion statement was MADONNA.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:00 PM
Aug 2015

If he wants to have the thing with him, he'd be better off putting it in a pouch around his neck. Displaying it is an invitation for punks to snag it and break it.

In gang areas, perhaps school colors of black/white/grey might be in order--with uniforms to match!

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
32. quid pro quo
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:22 PM
Aug 2015

As long as no yarmulke, or hijabs, or buddhist beads or prayer wheel, or wiccan or any religous pendants like star of david, crosses are allowed either then who cares. State schools are either for seperation of church and state or they aren't. Calling one religous symbol 'gang affiliation garb' to get past the religous element is just fakery bias against one religion. Deep six them all or none. Almost as bad as not allowing red or blue colors, that leaves black (also gangbanger), green, yellow, white and purple. What will designers do now ? Does this principal rate the pants draggers, underwear displayers the same way ?

On edit: of course the childs father could talk to a priest to get the church's take on it .. ie:

If the reason for wearing a rosary is as a statement of faith, as a reminder to pray it, or some similar reason "to the glory of God," then there is nothing to object to. It would not be respectful to wear it merely as jewelry.

This latter point is something to bear in mind in the case of wearing a rosary around the neck. In the first place, while not unknown, it is not common Catholic practice.

http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/wearing-the-rosary-as-a-necklace

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
33. One argument I have used for separation of church and state
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:31 PM
Aug 2015

is the likelihood of religion developing into an us\them dynamic that could actually become confrontational.

I'm not familiar with gang symbols or how they influence youth, but it seems like this is going a little far because it sounds like the kid views it more as a good luck charm than a religious or gang symbol.
At the same time, potential fallout from wearing a lucky confederate flag might give me pause, so this is a tough one.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
36. I wouldn't put it past some fools I have known
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:47 PM
Aug 2015

A t-shirt or hat or something with a widely recognized hate symbol could be pretty divisive even among high schoolers.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
35. Rosaries are NOT jewelry
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:46 PM
Aug 2015

If a kid goes to a PUBLIC school ALL "religious" stuff needs to be left at home..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California boy banned fro...