Why some GOPers want to ban abortion without exceptions
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/why-some-gopers-want-ban-abortion-without-exceptions
It was a baffling moment for many political observers. Democrats have won elections based on Republicans parsing of rape exceptions to abortion bans. The specter of a dying woman and the defiant claim, in contravention of medical evidence, that there is never any tension between her life and her pregnancy risks alienating even more voters. But to an increasingly influential wing of the anti-abortion movement, Walkers words were proof of victory in a long-simmering internal fight over how far to go, how fast.
There is a significant change happening in the pro-life base, and its happening on a national level, said Dan Becker, president of Georgia Right to Life. That shift is towards demanding, and being promised, an abortion ban without exceptions for rape, incest, or the life and health of the pregnant women. As many as half of the Republican candidates have fallen in line, a contrast from past election cycles....
Some are also frustrated with the organizations that have long dominated their cause, especially the National Right to Life Committee, which has adopted a more pragmatic and incremental approach. Last year, Beckers organization was ejected from its affiliation with the national group after it told Georgias congressional delegation to vote against a federal 20-week ban because it had exceptions for rape and incest. (This was the same bill over which a handful of Republican women rebelled for the opposite reason because they believed its rape exception was too narrow.)...
The split laid bare a broader dispute in the movement. As far as I am concerned, Georgia Right to Life has now become the Westboro Baptist Church of the pro-life movement, wrote prominent conservative activist Erick Erickson. Instead of saving souls, theyd rather stone those who are trying to save souls. But other anti-abortion groups have chosen to leave the fold and openly criticized the NRLC.