Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 06:12 AM Aug 2015

Gaza Strip 3D-Printed Stethoscope Costs $5, Outperforms $200 Competitors

Tarek Loubani, an emergency room doctor in Gaza, wants to apply the principles of open source software development to out-of-patent medical devices. His first success: A 3D-printed stethoscope head that costs 30 cents to make and, according to his tests, has better sound quality than the industry standard.

Loubani is the head of the Glia project, whose team of hackers and surgeons designed and field-tested the stethoscope. Audio-frequency response curve tests showed the device not only exceeds international standards, but offers superior sound quality compared to the industry-leading Littmann Cardiology 3.

The Littmann retails for $150-200. The Glia stethoscope, including the 3D printed head, tubing and ear piece, will cost around $5 to produce.


The stethoscope plans are already online, with all the devices coming out of the Glia project totally open source -- because the plan is not to manufacture and sell these 30 cent stethoscopes, but for Gazans to build them.



http://motherboard.vice.com/read/this-3d-printed-stethoscope-head-costs-5-outperforms-200-competitors

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-08/14/3d-printed-stethoscope-gaza

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gaza Strip 3D-Printed Stethoscope Costs $5, Outperforms $200 Competitors (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 OP
I kept a $12 stethoscope all through my nursing career Warpy Aug 2015 #1
Interesting -- more generally rogerashton Aug 2015 #2
+1 This technology is uncompatable with a profit-before people driven system. canoeist52 Aug 2015 #5
Interesting ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #3
This is one example of our technology getting ahead of our moral obligations, canoeist52 Aug 2015 #4

Warpy

(111,367 posts)
1. I kept a $12 stethoscope all through my nursing career
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 06:16 AM
Aug 2015

I did put neon pink tubing on it because I knew doctors wouldn't walk off with it after they'd borrowed it if it was that color. It worked.

Docs often said it was easier to hear through than their $400 cardiology scopes.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
2. Interesting -- more generally
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 07:08 AM
Aug 2015

3D printing is probably the most important recent innovation in manufacturing technology, more than the gradual progress in robotics.

Notice that -- on the one hand -- this stethoscope will make people better off, but -- on the other hand -- we won't see it reflected noticeably on the data on labor productivity, job growth, or profits. Are those metrics appropriate for the 21st Century?

ismnotwasm

(42,014 posts)
3. Interesting
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 07:15 AM
Aug 2015

For infection control where I work, dedicated stethoscopes are put in every room and carrying personal stethoscopes from patient to patient is strongly discouraged--prohibited in cases of isolation. The stethoscopes aren't the worst--but far from the best. It would nice to have a better quality available.

canoeist52

(2,282 posts)
4. This is one example of our technology getting ahead of our moral obligations,
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 08:02 AM
Aug 2015

There are many machinists among my family and friends, whose jobs are threatened by this. Their work straddles the old-style physical lathe work and the new fully programable machining.

I am very concerned for their futures. If this trend continues, there will have to be a form of basic income instituted.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gaza Strip 3D-Printed Ste...