General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBad News for Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis
http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/breaking_6th_circuit_slaps_down_kim_davis_request_for_stay_must_issue_licenses_monday.A three judge panel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has just refused Rowan County clerk Kim Davis' request for a stay on a lower federal court judge's ruling ordering her to issue marriage licenses to couples regardless of gender.
Davis claims issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples is a violation of her religious liberty. Her attorneys claim doing so would "substantially and irreparably" burden Davis' "conscience and deeply-held, sincere religious beliefs which dictate to Davis that such unions are not and cannot be 'marriage.'"
More at the link above
So now the question is this, is she going to still defy the court order?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)irisblue
(33,036 posts)this order from the 6th circuit court sure sounds like a legal slap to me...........................................................A three judge panel, which filed the order Wednesday in federal court, wrote a strongly-worded order that said there is "little or no likelihood that the clerk in her official capacity will prevail on appeal."In Wednesday's motion, the appeals court points out that "a state is not permitted to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex" and Davis "unilaterally decided that her office would no longer issue any marriage licenses."The request for a stay pending appeal relates solely to an injunction against Davis in her official capacity," the document says. "The injunction operates not against Davis personally, but against the holder of her office of Rowan County Clerk."
The order goes on to say that "it cannot be defensibly argued that the holder of the Rowan County Clerk's office, apart from who personally occupies that office, may decline to act in conformity with the United States Constitution as interpreted by a dispositive holding of the United States Supreme Court. There is thus little or no likelihood that the clerk in her official capacity will prevail on appeal."
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Yup, I would indeed.
roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)Celebrity Christian victim. Onward Christian Soldiers!