Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 01:45 PM May 2012

Stupid Teabaggers: 10 GOP Freshman Speak at 8th Grade Level

Even though the Constitution is written at college graduate level comprehension, a new study has found that ten Republican freshman speak at an 8th grade or lower level.

An analysis by the Sunlight Foundation has found that the speaking level of Congress as a whole has dropped by nearly a full grade level since 2005. Prior to 2005, Republicans spoke a slightly higher level than Democrats, but since the Democratic Party has had a share of power, Republicans have moved to the right and gotten less intellectual. In seven short years, Congress has gone from speaking at an eleventh grade level to a tenth grade level. If this continues, Congress will be back in junior high in less than 15 years.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone who follows politics that the stridently anti-intellectual tea party Republicans would have the top fifteen lowest speaking levels. Not every member of the intellectual low ballers was new to Congress. Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) has been in Congress for eleven years, and he speaks at a seventh grade level. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett has been in the House for fifteen years, and he also speaks at a seventh grade level.

Mostly though, the drag on the GOP’s verbosity has come from Tea Party freshman. Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) led the way by speaking at a seventh grade level. Second was Rob Woodall (R-GA) who spoke at an eighth grade level. Third was Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) who speaks at an 8.03 grade level. Fourth was former reality television star freshman Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI). Ten of the top 15 lowest speaking levels were Republican freshmen. Only three Democrats were present in the top 25, Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), and Rep. Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI).

http://www.politicususa.com/stupid-teabaggers-10-gop-freshman-speak-8th-grade-level.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

former9thward

(32,097 posts)
2. This is an unfortunte trend in American politics.
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:09 PM
May 2012

Take a look at speeches in the 1800s, they would never be given now. It seems to get worse every year. Obama's State of the Union speeches have been given at 8th grade levels too which is demoralizing given how good of a speaker he is. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2012/01/my_message_is_simple_obamas_so.php

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
11. I've had the same thought! Does that mullet-wearing dipshit realize that he is ...
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:50 PM
May 2012

the living, breathing embodiement of stupidity for tens of thousands of internet users?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
6. but but but...it's not because the officials are of lower intellect....it's their constituency.
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:31 PM
May 2012

Dont' you see? they are speaking 'down' to the masses.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
10. I just rewatched 'Oh Brother Where Art Thou?'
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:48 PM
May 2012

There's a part where the one politician is asking,
"Is you is or is you ain't my constituents?"

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. ...which means more people understand them
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:44 PM
May 2012

Most Americans, by far, are not college graduates.

You can keep calling people "stupid", but that's not going to win their vote.

What I've noticed among people of modest intellect is that arguments one way or another on any given issue are not all that important. They know that smart people can make arguments for or against just about anything.

But they can readily recognize people who insult and disrespect them, so they tend to go on "who can I trust" since they are fully aware that they can be fooled by complex arguments.
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
12. I don't see the point of this OP. I don't see how speaking at such and such a grade level
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:52 PM
May 2012

means anything in particular, least of all that someone is necessarily stupid.

It could equally well mean they communicate clearly, succinctly and with a minimum of unnecessary verbosity. There's nothing wrong with plain-speaking, especially in politics.

And this kind of political attack is not only stupid and mean-spirited, it's ineffective.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stupid Teabaggers: 10 GOP...