Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 10:25 PM Sep 2015

55 years ago conservatives feared a candidate might not respect the separation of church & state

My how times have changed.

On September 12, 1960 John Kennedy made a speech to a group of Protestant ministers in Houston, TX. There were a good many people who questioned whether or not a Catholic could or should be president. They feared he would not be able to keep his religion out of his decisions should he be elected president and would be apt to "take orders from the pope".

I would bet that the type of people who worried about JFK are same type who now think Kim Davis is a hero. Had she been around at the time, I have no doubt Kim Davis would have been afraid of Kennedy and his religion.

BTW, this is the speech Rick Santorum said made him want to throw up -- so you know it is worth reading.

A transcript is here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16920600

Or may watch the speech here:



[div class ="excerpt"]
“…But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected president, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured — perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again not what kind of church I believe in — for that should be important only to me — but what kind of America I believe in.

…I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the president who might appoint him or the people who might elect him...

…I believe in a president whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation, or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office…

…I want a chief executive whose public acts are responsible to all groups and obligated to none; who can attend any ceremony, service or dinner his office may appropriately require of him; and whose fulfillment of his presidential oath is not limited or conditioned by any religious oath, ritual or obligation…

..But if the time should ever come — and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible — when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
55 years ago conservatives feared a candidate might not respect the separation of church & state (Original Post) dflprincess Sep 2015 OP
The same people who now think Kim Davis is a hero... EL34x4 Sep 2015 #1
You know, I'm not clear on 'sanctuary cities...' What does that even mean? PatrickforO Sep 2015 #4
My understanding is it only means you're judged on your crimes committed and not your immigration herding cats Sep 2015 #6
Interesting. I had forgotten about this dhol82 Sep 2015 #2
intiguingly super-liberal Paul Blanshard was in the forefront of the 1960 campaign MisterP Sep 2015 #9
Not really inconsistant or hypocritical... Wounded Bear Sep 2015 #3
The difference now is there is so little conscience or integrity. babylonsister Sep 2015 #5
I remember well the JFK kerfuffle. Suich Sep 2015 #7
JFK was my first vote for president. 840high Sep 2015 #8
Because JFK was Catholic. DirkGently Sep 2015 #10
K&R smirkymonkey Sep 2015 #11
The Making of a Catholic President: Kennedy vs. Nixon 1960 SecularMotion Sep 2015 #12
The rise of the religous right - dflprincess Sep 2015 #13
 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
1. The same people who now think Kim Davis is a hero...
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 10:38 PM
Sep 2015

...would be outraged if a municipality continued to ban handguns in violation of D.C. v. Heller. They're the same people who scream about "sanctuary cities" flouting immigration laws. The same people who complain about Muslim cab drivers not wanting alcohol in their cabs.

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
6. My understanding is it only means you're judged on your crimes committed and not your immigration
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:52 PM
Sep 2015

status.

Basically, ICE holds aren't done in "sanctuary cities" if you've fulfilled your commitment to society otherwise within the US borders. YMMV considering there's no definitive definition. Mine is based on experience living in and working within the system in one such city in the US.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
2. Interesting. I had forgotten about this
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 10:48 PM
Sep 2015

But now remember the hysteria that surrounded the whole episode. The rending of clothes and gnashing of teeth about 'that catholic' and how the pope would have control over the United States. It was really stupid.

Nobody ever cared that Nixon was raised as a Quaker.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
9. intiguingly super-liberal Paul Blanshard was in the forefront of the 1960 campaign
Sat Sep 5, 2015, 01:01 PM
Sep 2015

until 1980 Americans United was there to keep America *Protestant*; the baiting in turn helped push the USCCB into right-wing stuff, especially on abortion and LGBT, in the 80s and 90s (while damning Reagan and capitalism, but whatever) to prevent further attacks from the Protestant right

they even debated if the 1st Amendment should apply to Popery since it was a "different sort" of religion than what they had here--heck, their 18th-century fantasy of swarming Jesuits and St Bart's Massacres was probably much more influential in getting the 1A conceived than deistic worries over establishment; ironically they wrote the 1A for strict neutrality because of all these

some conspiracy watchers say that if the Birchers had done and/or smoothed the path for Dallas 1963 it was as much because he was a Papist as well as a pinko in their eyes--and frankly every Red-baiting trope came from what they said about the Jews and the Irish back in the 20s!

reading their stuff, that wouldn't come as that big a surprise https://archive.org/stream/freethinkerspict00hest#page/n7/mode/2up

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
5. The difference now is there is so little conscience or integrity.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:46 PM
Sep 2015

I often wonder why those traits are no longer necessary in politicians. I miss both.

Suich

(10,642 posts)
7. I remember well the JFK kerfuffle.
Sat Sep 5, 2015, 12:05 AM
Sep 2015

Word was, if elected, he would be taking his orders from Rome.

...whatever that means.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
10. Because JFK was Catholic.
Sat Sep 5, 2015, 01:09 PM
Sep 2015

Even though Protestantism is an offshoot of Catholicism, which is a breakaway cult of Judaism, which was copied by Islam, everyone seems to think the problem is when other peoples' religion has too much influence in politics.

The co-author of the First Amendment saw things a bit more clearly:

Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/01/separation-of-church-and-state-santorum-vs-madison/251546/
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
12. The Making of a Catholic President: Kennedy vs. Nixon 1960
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:21 PM
Sep 2015

[center][/center]

In The Making of a Catholic President, Shaun Casey tells the fascinating story of how the Kennedy campaign transformed the "religion question" from a liability into an asset, making him the first (and still only) Catholic president. Drawing on extensive archival research, including many never-before-seen documents, Casey takes us inside the campaign to show Kennedy's chief advisors--Ted Sorensen, John Kenneth Galbraith, Archibald Cox--grappling with the staunch opposition to the candidate's Catholicism. Casey also reveals, for the first time, many of the Nixon campaign's efforts to tap in to anti-Catholic sentiment, with the aid of Billy Graham and the National Association of Evangelicals, among others. The alliance between conservative Protestants and the Nixon campaign, he shows, laid the groundwork for the rise of the Religious Right. This book will shed light on one of the most talked-about elections in American history, as well as on the vexed relationship between religion and politics more generally.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Making-Catholic-President-Kennedy/dp/0195374487

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
13. The rise of the religous right -
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 10:53 PM
Sep 2015

something else we can thank Nixon for.

I know I read once that Jackie said she didn't understand all the to do over religion because, as she said, "Jack isn't a very good Catholic."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»55 years ago conservative...