When you're as bad at campaigns as Scott Walker, you should just give up
The candidate who wants to deny the science behind male-pattern baldness more than the science behind climate change isnt in it to win it........
A good campaign introduces a candidate and his best ideas to sympathetic and like-minded voters through a combination of events, press coverage and paid outreach, allowing him or her to attract campaign donations and new supporters alike. A bad campaign forces a candidate to get on the phone to reassure his existing donors that he exists and is going to abandon the sinking into obscurity tactic that hadnt been working.
A truly terrible campaign is at hand when the most widely-reported news story is the candidates old claim that his bald spot totally isnt genetic but comes from banging his head against the underside of a cabinet.
snip........
And that doesnt even get into the hail of convictions and indictments in his administration and the campaign finance investigation that suddenly stopped thanks to Wisconsin Supreme Court justices who received donations from many of the same groups being investigated. Walker was always going to have trouble with the scrutiny of a national campaign, outside those justices reach and outside the demographics of an overwhelmingly white state whose racial divisions he heightened with the help of a sycophantic right-wing media.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/03/scott-walker-bad-campaigns-give-up