Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corporations are people (Original Post) marym625 Sep 2015 OP
Thought Provoking - Good Deal For People - Since Corporations Never Have To Retire cantbeserious Sep 2015 #1
Great point marym625 Sep 2015 #3
Yes - Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks - No Freind Of The 99% cantbeserious Sep 2015 #5
the big four marym625 Sep 2015 #6
Corporations could have to retire if we returned to regulating them as was originally intended ToxMarz Sep 2015 #12
All Too True - However - The 1% Have Rigged The Game cantbeserious Sep 2015 #13
welcome back mary m guillaumeb Sep 2015 #2
Thanks, guillaumeb! marym625 Sep 2015 #4
corporations DO pay Social Security -- they pay the matching FICA for their employees antigop Sep 2015 #7
Yes, talking about their responsibility, as people, marym625 Sep 2015 #10
Specially since the Rock is a Republican. marble falls Sep 2015 #8
who knew!? marym625 Sep 2015 #11
Problem Solved - Especially when Bernie Lifts the CAP! Ferd Berfel Sep 2015 #9
No one is clamoring to retire at 40 or even 60. But 65 would be nice. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #15
I just retired at 65 Ferd Berfel Sep 2015 #21
I am 62. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #22
how about retiring before we drop dead? marym625 Sep 2015 #16
My employer pays 50% of FICA Helen Borg Sep 2015 #14
it's factored into the salary. marym625 Sep 2015 #17
Right, they "write it off"... Helen Borg Sep 2015 #18
yes, they do. and they do no pay income taxes like their employees do noiretextatique Sep 2015 #19
it is an expense that directly lowers their income marym625 Sep 2015 #20

marym625

(17,997 posts)
3. Great point
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 04:57 PM
Sep 2015

I'm sure accountants would figure out a way to make the income zero so no social security would have to be paid. Just like all the new IFRS rules on RECs, derivatives, etc.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
6. the big four
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:20 PM
Sep 2015

Just do what the corporations, oligarchs and governments want. They all work together to screw the 99%

ToxMarz

(2,169 posts)
12. Corporations could have to retire if we returned to regulating them as was originally intended
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:47 PM
Sep 2015
http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/history_of_corporations.html|


Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end.

The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these:

* Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.

* Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.

* Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.

* Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.

* Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.

* Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow.

States also limited corporate charters to a set number of years. Unless a legislature renewed an expiring charter, the corporation was dissolved and its assets were divided among shareholders. Citizen authority clauses limited capitalization, debts, land holdings, and sometimes, even profits. They required a company's accounting books to be turned over to a legislature upon request. The power of large shareholders was limited by scaled voting, so that large and small investors had equal voting rights. Interlocking directorates were outlawed. Shareholders had the right to remove directors at will.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
7. corporations DO pay Social Security -- they pay the matching FICA for their employees
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:22 PM
Sep 2015

Now if you are referring to the corporations having to pay SS tax on their income, that's another story.

But then they play accounting games to reduce (or eliminate) their reported income.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
10. Yes, talking about their responsibility, as people,
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:06 PM
Sep 2015

To pay into social security. Not their responsibility as employers.

Yes, that accounting game is an ever evolving, the company wins game.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
21. I just retired at 65
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:14 PM
Sep 2015

60 or 55 would have been better...... By a lot!
Let me know how you feel about once you get to this point.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
17. it's factored into the salary.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:10 PM
Sep 2015

They budget for all payroll taxes when they hire people. Not the same as paying on their income.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
19. yes, they do. and they do no pay income taxes like their employees do
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 03:53 PM
Sep 2015

nor do we get to write-off the taxes we pay. and we are even taxed on unemployment "income," which is beyond absurd.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
20. it is an expense that directly lowers their income
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 08:22 PM
Sep 2015

And lowers what they pay taxes on. It's part of the company operating expenses and, therefore, lowers the net profit

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corporations are people