General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne more observation about bravenak's letter, and then I'm done.
There's developed an insinuation amongst those who are invested in deflecting from the possibility that this was a DUer and, moreso, a Sanders supporter, that such an allegation doesn't comport with the motive of the letter-writer. The theory observes that an actual supporter wouldn't send a threatening missive, as it would only serve to make him or her look bad - and, by extension, all Sanders supporters.
That, of course, involves hypotheticals based on one fantastic presumption; specifically that the idiot in question had a motive... other than the most logical: to harass bravenak.
From that fantasy sprouts the unchallenged presumption that the letter would be posted, rather than either ignored or dealt with privately. It also presumes that its posting would result in an outcry, and that said outcry would lead to broad-brushing a group, rather than condemning the individual (which, incidentally, didn't happen).
I'm no longer going to discuss anyone's grooming aids but, fer chrissakes. What's that recent advice? "Stop misusing your head"?
Sounds sound, if you ask me.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)accepting the obvious.
Marr
(20,317 posts)C'mon, surely you can see how your own agenda is shading your opinion here.
Honestly now, if the same thing were done with a closing line like, 'GO HILLARY', are you really going to tell me you wouldn't question the honesty of the letter writer...?
The sender could absolutely be a rabid, asshole Sanders supporter. But it could also be someone else entirely. We just don't know.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)I feel the letter was sent by a Bernie supporter like the letter said. I've seen virtually the same posted here from Bernie supporters. Like bravenak was race baiting, that she was faking to be a Bernie supporter, the alert stalking that got her 4 hides in one thread in less than a day, etc.
Face it some kook who posted here and was a Bernie supporter sent the letter. What is the big deal with acknowledging that?
And if I saw similarities from some Hillary supporters and the same was done to a Bernie supporter, yes I do believe I would believe it originated from someone here/ a Hillary poster.
Marr
(20,317 posts)My personal opinion is that 'rabid Sanders supporter' is probably the most likely category-- but it's just so unknowable given what we have that I hesitate to even say that much. I certainly don't think we can flatly state that it is so, or that people who express doubts are engaging in 'conspiracy theory'.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)remember the lllloooonnnnggg history of certain sites doing horrific things to people here. So discounting that history and taking this at truly face value is actually politically motivated, or naive or both. YMWV
For God sakes, one if them hastened the death of a popular member here...I mean that and I am not being overtly dramatic. That war, and it was a war, led to the first great exodus...and with that and the passage of years, only a few of us are left, relatively speaking. This too shall pass. But am afraid it will lead to another exodus...poof institutional memory...and next time, and there will be a next time,...somebody gets mucked up with...relatively newbies will refuse to listen to the old timers and guaranteed will call it a CT as well.
At this point I don't know whether to laugh or cry...but to whoever did it, congrats Sir/ma'am, you got the desired results.
And it will happen again. Partly because people make it way too easy... And I do not mean the primary victims here, I mean the site members that immediately break into finger pointing camps.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)But, once again I do.
Certain folks on DU have decided who they want to blame, and by extension blame the "other candidate" lol.
I'm still undecided on my vote for the Dem candidate. No bad behavior by either side will sway me once I make up my mind, nor will it influence what I decide.
Awful behavior on both sides, and it just makes DU suck.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall when the admins discuss the latest thing on DU. I can only imagine.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that is why we are going to require a pretty high level of proof that it was a DU'er.
That said, it could have been...we get people joining here all the time from those lovely sites. Another piece of huge red data they are dismissing. Some even have high post counts..a few served as mods, now likely as hosts.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)My own useless opinion is that it is not our job to figure this out (we can't) but to support bravenak the best we can while people who CAN solve this take care of that. It is insane the finger pointing and divisive language that goes on over this. I guess people just feel the need to use every single thing to get themselves on top. Successful, in more ways than the creep intended. Perhaps not, we always act the same way every time.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Are you really going to tell me you believe that?
Geez.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)for a heinous crime. I've seen over 100 such supporters insist as much today.
Those crazy Muslims and Sanders supporters! How dare they suggest that this might have been a setup!
betsuni
(25,532 posts)Heinous vulgar and disgusting -- unless they enjoy a bit of fingering, of course.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Small children are sneaky enough to point their fingers wrongfully at their siblings to avoid accountability for their misdeeds. Adults who can write and lick a stamp are certainly capable of being just as sneaky.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)It seems far more likely that he just expected and wanted Bravenak to be intimidated.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)that Bravenak would post the letter than that she would throw it away or be intimidated by it?
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)to effectively announce that they didn't read the OP, and to use that as leverage to continue to promote their fantasies.
Well... not impressed so much as unsurprised.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)All it demonstrated was your own confirmation bias.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Learn what a conspiracy theory actually is. Hint: It is not interpreting the letter of one anonymous author and/or the circumstances around said letter differently than you do.
JI7
(89,250 posts)So even if in this case the person was not really a sanders supporter it would be wrong to say they would not say these things which would make them look bad.
What i noticed most was how much it sounded like the things said during blm Protests .
boston bean
(36,221 posts)During Bernie's BLM fiasco's. And it wasn't hidden, and it was ferocious, and it was mean. So, I wonder why if it much of the same was said here right in the open and it didn't bother too many people, why they thinking this makes them look bad?
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And Sanders' momentum just kept increasing. And somebody didn't like that too much.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It's been non stop bull...
We should be coming together about this, yet we are tearing each other apart. And people are unable to separate their personal political views from this bigger issue.
IBTL.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)As a Sanders supporter, I've stated repeatedly that I hope this idiotic letter was not authored by a true Sanders supporter. But I'm not dismissing the possibility that it was. But even if it was, I don't understand your point. Are you suggesting that a Sanders supporter sent this crap thinking it would appear like it was sent by a Clinton supporter in order to discredit Sanders supporters? I'm not sure what motive you are attributing to who, but I think you are giving "Mr Citizen" waaaaay too much credit.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)I'm pointing out that others are saying it.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and now there's "proof" ... an actual piece of paper, that says nasty things,
never mind that nobody knows who this jerk is who sent it, much less what
real their agenda is.
We must take EVERYTHING at face value, esp. when it supports my narrative.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)It's been a flame war for weeks to make this mostly a Bernie Sanders forum. Things have settled down a bit recently because many voices have been jury silenced or left...hell there was even an announcement of a new Hillary site where you can enjoy her candidacy in peace.
If your a Bernie supporter, here every day reading this stuff...and a little off kilter...it's quite conceivable you might think the letters were a "cool" thing to do...
It would certainly be no surprise to me if it was a DUer...it fits with the current culture here.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)That's the kind of thing one hears around here about Sanders supporters every day. It's not true, not in any overarching sense. And it never made any sense. But now there are a small handful of people trying to use this now-famous letter to reinforce that unsupportable point of view. I've seen it 3 or 4 times now in the last 2 days.
Here's a bottom line, of sorts: Anywhere from 0 to 1 Bernie Sanders supporters sent a nasty piece of US Mail to Bravenak. That number might be zero, and it might be one. Whichever it is, it's not greater than or equal to two. Ergo, Bernie Sanders supporters have no need whatsoever to feel a sense of collective guilt, and no need to stop pointing out when we believe Hillary Clinton is wrong, as some have suggested. For the many DU'ers I've seen standing behind Bravenak and supporting her through this stupid thing, I salute you for coming together and closing ranks. For the very few who are using this situation in an attempt to throw stones at the Sanders campaign and his supporters--knock it off; there's no call for that kind of shit.
jfern
(5,204 posts)I hope it was 0. Bernie definitely doesn't want the vote of anyone who would do something like this. But either way, it's just a tiny fraction of the Bernie supporters, and 1 very bad apple that did something bad in isolation doesn't reflect on a much larger group.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)The odds are overwhelmingly in my favor.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)And that's all I'll say.
Sid
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)of all the heinous supporters of the candidate who is threatening the candidate I favor.
How about all of you?
betsuni
(25,532 posts)Use this word in a sentence, all of you.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)betsuni
(25,532 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Human nature. It's the personal that should bother people.