Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boxman15

(1,033 posts)
Tue May 22, 2012, 04:46 PM May 2012

Roger Ailes: We know nothing about Obama, Stewart is a socialist who'd be out of a job without Faux

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/05/22/488271/fox-news-ailes-obama/

Notable quotes from Roger Ailes' no-audio, no-video speech/Q&A session/rant at Ohio University:

- "Tiger Woods gets hit with a 4 iron and we know every girlfriend within 12 miles. We still don't know anything about Obama"

- "I would love for the AP to go back to being a neutral news source"

- "They're not news programs...Jon Stewart would go out of business without Fox News"

- "Jon Stewart is a comedian. He wouldn't do well without Fox. And he basically has admitted to me, in a bar, that he's a socialist."

- "To be honest, I don't give a damn about being here (at OU)" Classy.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roger Ailes: We know nothing about Obama, Stewart is a socialist who'd be out of a job without Faux (Original Post) boxman15 May 2012 OP
Who cares what that stooge for the military/industrial complex thinks? Cleita May 2012 #1
You know pigs are suppose to be good luck in Germany. But he sure takes them to another southernyankeebelle May 2012 #2
Why is it that when these dolts open their mouths... KansDem May 2012 #3
And he's now given Jon another few nights of material. Arkana May 2012 #4
Hmmm... Let's find out! Take Faux off the air and see how long Stewart lasts. qb May 2012 #5
Stewart was around and doing well even before Fox News was Cleita May 2012 #8
LOL. Have you seen 'The Faculty?' RZM May 2012 #12
That fascist scrotum should be ridiculed everywhere he goes. nt Guy Whitey Corngood May 2012 #6
I don't think Jon would work for Faux if hifiguy May 2012 #7
Stewart has something Ailes will never have. Integrity think May 2012 #9
Ailes has pretty big balls Aerows May 2012 #17
A known liar says Jon Stewart is a socialist? abelenkpe May 2012 #10
"basically admitted" Major Nikon May 2012 #19
Didn't NewsCorp buy the AP? arcane1 May 2012 #11
6 years in and you know nothing about obama.. frylock May 2012 #13
Yeah, isn't he in charge of a "news" channel? JHB May 2012 #16
Probably because he's been watching FOX... Frustratedlady May 2012 #18
Maybe Obama not getting hit with a 4 iron should tell you something, Roger. n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #14
Of course, to Ailes, Eisenhower was probably a socialist... JHB May 2012 #15
He makes it sound like "knowing next to nothing" ... surrealAmerican May 2012 #20
another old man pining for the days when people thought he actually was important madrchsod May 2012 #21
political extremist running a network... think about that! fascisthunter May 2012 #22

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
1. Who cares what that stooge for the military/industrial complex thinks?
Tue May 22, 2012, 04:49 PM
May 2012

If Ohioans give this fat creep a platform for his misconceived ideas, no wonder Ohio is in trouble.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
2. You know pigs are suppose to be good luck in Germany. But he sure takes them to another
Tue May 22, 2012, 04:52 PM
May 2012

level. This guy only wishes he had the demographics Stewart has. His demographics are getting older and are dying off.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
12. LOL. Have you seen 'The Faculty?'
Tue May 22, 2012, 05:48 PM
May 2012

By average Joe standards Stewart was doing well in the early/mid 90s, but maybe not by entertainment standards. His MTV show was pretty short-lived and he bounced around doing cameos on crappy movies. But he was gaining buzz, which led to his taking over for Kilborn at the Daily Show.

I never missed the Daily Show back then (it debuted a few months before Fox News launched). Interestingly, I think a lot of people. including myself, were skeptical that the show would last when Stewart took over. Back then the main draw wasn't the host but the correspondents, almost all of whom left the same time Kilborn did. I was pleasantly surprised that the show was just as good with Stewart at the helm, mainly because the writing remained strong.

I'm impressed that the show has become what it has. I never envisioned it would be so relevant. Remember too that back then, it had more of a focus on quirky comedy and the entertainment business. But under Stewart it slowly became more and more political. It really is quite a success story.

I think Ailes is exaggerating about Fox's role in the show's success, but there is a nugget of truth there. Much of the show is dedicated to making fun of the cable news channels. If anything, it's CNN that Stewart should be thanking, since his infamous spanking of them on 'Crossfire' greatly upped his cred.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
17. Ailes has pretty big balls
Tue May 22, 2012, 06:12 PM
May 2012

and very tiny amounts of integrity to even try to attack Jon Stewart. Jon Stewart has more integrity and intelligence in his little finger than Ailes has in his whole body, just like Ailes has more meaness in his body than a flock of Westboro Church members and more deceitfulness than the entirety of 1960's Pravda.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
10. A known liar says Jon Stewart is a socialist?
Tue May 22, 2012, 05:26 PM
May 2012

Like I'm going to believe anything that Roger Ailes has to say about anything or anyone.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
13. 6 years in and you know nothing about obama..
Tue May 22, 2012, 05:53 PM
May 2012

sez more about your stupid ass then it does about obama. at least that's what i like to tell the fuckwits that trot out "he hasn't been vetted!!1" well what's the fucking holdup?! vet away, dumbnuts!

JHB

(37,162 posts)
16. Yeah, isn't he in charge of a "news" channel?
Tue May 22, 2012, 06:09 PM
May 2012

If we "know next to nothing" by now, that would indicate poor allocation of resources for a news organization. That would be a failure of top management, and that would be... who, again?

Of course, facts have nothing to do with that operation.

JHB

(37,162 posts)
15. Of course, to Ailes, Eisenhower was probably a socialist...
Tue May 22, 2012, 06:04 PM
May 2012

...what with all the regulation and high taxes on the rich back then.

surrealAmerican

(11,364 posts)
20. He makes it sound like "knowing next to nothing" ...
Tue May 22, 2012, 06:28 PM
May 2012

... means that President Obama simply hasn't had any affairs for Roger Ailes to find. That must be the only thing they were looking for.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
21. another old man pining for the days when people thought he actually was important
Tue May 22, 2012, 07:14 PM
May 2012

sadly no one cares anymore about what he has to say. i think dyan wrote it best.."the times they are a changing"
roger is so out of touch with reality he does`t notice that colbert is far better than stewart when it comes to political theater.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
22. political extremist running a network... think about that!
Tue May 22, 2012, 07:16 PM
May 2012

And the right bitches about NPR... hahahahahaahaha... they want total control.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roger Ailes: We know noth...