Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Voters on Romney's Brilliant Business Career: Meh
I'm looking at the numbers in the new (pre-Cory Booker) ABC/Washington Post poll, specifically the numbers on one question in particular, and I'm amazed at how little benefit Romney's getting from his business career (which, after thirty-plus years of corporatist, Reaganite propaganda, would seem to be a terrific selling point for middle-of-the-road voters):
Here are the results:
Major reason to support 21%
Major reason to oppose 21%
Not a major factor 54%
No opinion 4%
A wash -- an absolute wash. And subgroups you'd think would be impressed by Bain aren't impressed. Whites? A mere two-point advantage for "Major reason to support," with the majority indifferent. Southerners? A four-point advantage, with the majority indifferent. White evangelical Protestants? A mere seven-point advantage -- you'd think Romney would be killing with this group -- and most people indifferent. Really, Romney's only big advantages are with Republicans, conservatives, and conservative Republicans.
....
I think one problem Romney has is that he's being hoist on his own party's petard. For years, the GOP and the right have tried to distinguish "elitists" from "extremely rich people," with great success -- "elitists" are to be recognized, according to right-wing propaganda, by cultural touchstones (hybrid cars, organic food, stereotypical places of residence, lack of "common touch," etc., etc.). The GOP's last three presidents were two nth-generation preppies who faked ordinariness, preceded by a Hollywood millionaire who faked it even better. But Romney can't fake it. He talks elitist, he dresses elitist, and even his specific path to wealth sounds elitist. Private equity -- what could sound more elitist than that? It's not like drillin' a damn oil well.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/5/22/161045/847
Q: Is Romney's work buying and restructuring companies before he went into politics a major reason you to (support) that candidate, a major reason you to (oppose) that candidate, or not a major factor in your vote?
Here are the results:
Major reason to support 21%
Major reason to oppose 21%
Not a major factor 54%
No opinion 4%
A wash -- an absolute wash. And subgroups you'd think would be impressed by Bain aren't impressed. Whites? A mere two-point advantage for "Major reason to support," with the majority indifferent. Southerners? A four-point advantage, with the majority indifferent. White evangelical Protestants? A mere seven-point advantage -- you'd think Romney would be killing with this group -- and most people indifferent. Really, Romney's only big advantages are with Republicans, conservatives, and conservative Republicans.
....
I think one problem Romney has is that he's being hoist on his own party's petard. For years, the GOP and the right have tried to distinguish "elitists" from "extremely rich people," with great success -- "elitists" are to be recognized, according to right-wing propaganda, by cultural touchstones (hybrid cars, organic food, stereotypical places of residence, lack of "common touch," etc., etc.). The GOP's last three presidents were two nth-generation preppies who faked ordinariness, preceded by a Hollywood millionaire who faked it even better. But Romney can't fake it. He talks elitist, he dresses elitist, and even his specific path to wealth sounds elitist. Private equity -- what could sound more elitist than that? It's not like drillin' a damn oil well.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/5/22/161045/847
