General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSantorum intends to ‘abolish the State Department’
Santorum intends to abolish the State DepartmentBy Steve Benen at msnbc
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/santorum-intends-abolish-the-state-department
"SNIP...........
Pressed by Beck about the practicalities of firing the entire State Department, Santorum responded with a critique of the departments single-minded focus on international diplomacy.
Its like, if all the tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, Santorum said. Every problem that the State Department has, the answer is diplomacy. Why? Because if its not diplomacy, they dont have a job.
Hmm. So, in the mind of the former two-term senator and GOP presidential candidate, the problem with the State Department is that its filled with diplomats, who have a nasty habit of focusing on diplomacy.
Santorum added that, among State Department officials the answer is never to do anything, the answer is always to appease, to talk.
Got it. So appeasement and diplomacy are, in Santorums mind, literally synonymous, and reaching diplomatic solutions has the practical effect of doing nothing.
...............SNIP"
applegrove
(118,778 posts)quite a plan.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The Department of Defense is full of guys whose only answer to every problem is 'go kill people'. To blow things up, bomb them, shoot them, kill them. So maybe we should get rid of them too.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)angryvet
(181 posts)he'll never have the chance. Beats me why this jerk is still hanging on.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)has more chance of being elected than Santorum.
applegrove
(118,778 posts)as CEOS. That they want diplomacy to benefit themselves with jobs. As if business and the profit motive is no different than any of the helping or service professions. There is a term for that that I have forgotten. Anyone?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Remind me again, how many years did Rick Santorum serve in the military? Any of his kids? Or was he protected in his stupidity by diplomacy?
Javaman
(62,534 posts)spanone
(135,876 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)method of international behavior.
That is actually a pretty common theme on the right. Why talk with other countries and consider what they want when we are big and strong enough to just tell them what we are going to do and forcing them to live with it?
malaise
(269,157 posts)This fucking idiot won't even be in the next round of ReTHUG debates