General Discussion

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts) Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:21 PM Sep 2015

Fox News on Pope's White House visit

I thought I’d check out Fox for their take on the Pope’s visit to the White House this morning.
Not surprisingly, they had a right wing slant.

For example:
1. “Some people” are saying the Pope should stick to religion, and that he has no business getting into political things like climate change.

2. By arriving at the White House in a small Fiat, the Pope gave a slap in the face to President Obama, who likes to ride around in a big fancy limo.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox News on Pope's White House visit (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Sep 2015 OP

Did they actually use the limo reference? sharp_stick Sep 2015 #1

Yes left-of-center2012 Sep 2015 #2

You just can not make this stuff up. Wellstone ruled Sep 2015 #3

Foxnews is the brainfood for zombies and zenophobes. Rex Sep 2015 #4

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)

1. Did they actually use the limo reference?

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Original post)

Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:27 PM

Sep 2015

I know they're beyond fucking stupid but I think something like that would be considered stupid by a few of their higher functioning viewers.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)

2. Yes

Reply to sharp_stick (Reply #1)

Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:31 PM

Sep 2015

It was some blond woman speaking among a group of 3 o 4 commentators.
Along the lines of a flippant remark.

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

3. You just can not make this stuff up.

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Original post)

Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:44 PM

Sep 2015

Pope Frankie just proved that Fake Noise does not have a clue as to what the real world is all about. Pope and threats to his bodily harm near zero. Obama threats to his life comes from every POS that watches Fake Noise. Message received.

Rex

(65,616 posts)

4. Foxnews is the brainfood for zombies and zenophobes.

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Original post)

Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:48 PM

Sep 2015

Reply to this discussion