General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSudden evacuation more harmful to elderly care patients than radiation: study
The sudden evacuation of elderly nursing home residents with long-standing ailments or disabilities after the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster was more harmful to their health than radiation exposure had they remained at the homes, suggests a new study.
Researchers looked at 191 residents and 184 employees at three special care elderly nursing homes in Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, within 20 to 30 kilometers of the stricken Fukushima plant.
The residents were evacuated to other municipalities around 10 days after the disaster. Researchers compared data on their deaths afterwards to a hypothetical situation where they stayed at the homes and faced no added risks to their health besides radiation exposure.
The researchers determined that the evacuation caused a combined loss of 11,000 days to the lifespans of the evacuated residents. A possible reason, they say, is a drop in the level of care due to the sudden evacuation. On the other hand, if the residents had stayed at the homes for 100 days, the researchers estimated based on radiation exposure data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombing survivors that the drop in lifespan would have been a combined 27 days, a difference of around 400 times.
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20150924p2a00m0na002000c.html
cwydro
(51,308 posts)And I surely believe it's true.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,360 posts)and so you have to decide how you handle that; would it have been possible to find enough volunteers among the employees who would understand the rough risks (and, at the time, what that risk was would have been only a very rough guess) and would have been willing to take those risks to enable the residents to stay?
On edit: reading the paper, its emphasis seems to be on carefully planning evacuations, rather than doing them suddenly, which seems fair enough.