Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yuiyoshida

(41,853 posts)
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 04:59 AM Sep 2015

Sudden evacuation more harmful to elderly care patients than radiation: study

The sudden evacuation of elderly nursing home residents with long-standing ailments or disabilities after the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster was more harmful to their health than radiation exposure had they remained at the homes, suggests a new study.

Researchers looked at 191 residents and 184 employees at three special care elderly nursing homes in Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, within 20 to 30 kilometers of the stricken Fukushima plant.

The residents were evacuated to other municipalities around 10 days after the disaster. Researchers compared data on their deaths afterwards to a hypothetical situation where they stayed at the homes and faced no added risks to their health besides radiation exposure.

The researchers determined that the evacuation caused a combined loss of 11,000 days to the lifespans of the evacuated residents. A possible reason, they say, is a drop in the level of care due to the sudden evacuation. On the other hand, if the residents had stayed at the homes for 100 days, the researchers estimated based on radiation exposure data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombing survivors that the drop in lifespan would have been a combined 27 days, a difference of around 400 times.

http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20150924p2a00m0na002000c.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sudden evacuation more harmful to elderly care patients than radiation: study (Original Post) yuiyoshida Sep 2015 OP
This makes me very sad. cwydro Sep 2015 #1
However, staying in the homes would possibly put the employees at greater individual risk muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #2

muriel_volestrangler

(101,360 posts)
2. However, staying in the homes would possibly put the employees at greater individual risk
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 05:55 AM
Sep 2015

and so you have to decide how you handle that; would it have been possible to find enough volunteers among the employees who would understand the rough risks (and, at the time, what that risk was would have been only a very rough guess) and would have been willing to take those risks to enable the residents to stay?

On edit: reading the paper, its emphasis seems to be on carefully planning evacuations, rather than doing them suddenly, which seems fair enough.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sudden evacuation more ha...