Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,797 posts)
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 03:15 AM Oct 2015

How Maine will punish the poor for trying to save money

In Maine, though, the governor has fired up a debate about whether an individual can have a bit of money in the bank and still need governmental assistance. Starting as early as Nov. 1, Maine is going to limit the financial assets of welfare recipients, effectively discouraging them from saving money.

The state will place a $5,000 cap on the savings and other assets of residents enrolled in the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Those whose bank accounts, secondary vehicles and homes, and other assets considered non-essential by the government, exceed the limit will no longer be eligible to participate in the food stamp program. An individual's primary home and vehicle won't count toward the limit.

The thinking, according to the Gov. Paul LePage's office, is simple: People shouldn't be allowed to take money from the government if they don't need to. "Most Mainers would agree that before someone receives taxpayer-funded welfare benefits, they should sell non-essential assets and use their savings,” LePage said in a written statement.

"What people see, what they're concerned about these days, is the abuse of the welfare system," added David Sorensen, who is the director of media relations and policy research for Maine's Department of Health and Human Services. "Well, it's an abuse to enroll in the system when you've got $5,000 in the bank."

But the unintended consequences of asset tests, like the one soon to be implemented in Maine, can be crippling, according to a growing pool of people who oppose such requirements. They argue that impoverished Americans, hoping to break from the cycle of poverty, are instead further bound by it. Many in Maine, struggling to make ends meet, will no longer put money aside, since doing so could jeopardize their ability to eat.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/how-maine-will-punish-the-poor-for-trying-to-save-money/ar-AAeZLls?li=AAa0dzB&ocid=mailsignout

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
1. If you can't earn enough to not need SNAP because you need a car to get a better job,
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 03:42 AM
Oct 2015

you can't save for the car, except in your mattress.............

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
2. Also, SNAP recipients must endure an annual beating.
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 06:10 AM
Oct 2015

Because, really, if you aren't desperate enough to tolerate being knocked unconscious by repeated blows to the head, you have no right taking public money.

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
4. Monsters. They rush to harass those who have no one to speak for them, no where to turn.
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 06:51 AM
Oct 2015

Hope the ground opens up and swallows these sadistic assholes, every last one of them. Immediately.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
5. I say we apply this rule to all the corporations receiving taxpayer subsidies.
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 07:49 AM
Oct 2015

No more money for you, Exxon, until you unload those assets. (As if.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Maine will punish the...