General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMuch as we might like, we can't just edit away a shooter's identity and background from public view
After every mass shooting, there is always the suggestion battered around that the identity of the shooter not be released, his background not be released, his motives not be released, etc.
And I get why people say they want this. They don't want some sick, demented person out there to celebrate mass shooters as twisted celebrities and perhaps invite them to copycat their handiwork. Nor do they want discussion about the shooter and his possible motives to overshadow those of his victims.
I get what you're saying. Really. I do.
But you can't just do that.
First of all, there's what's called the First Amendment and public records laws and freedom of the press and freedom of information. So there's a huge legal obstacle right off the bat.
But beyond even that, do we really want to whitewash away key facts about these tragic events that we are so tired of having to go through? How can we learn about how to better address these situations in the future if we've hidden the facts from past incidents?
The problem is, we live in a country where the gun lobby has prevented so many sensible legal restrictions on gun purchasing and ownership that would have likely prevented at least some of the incidents we've come to know in the past few years. Because our laws and our enforcement of such laws are so lacking, it requires additional vigilance on behalf of ordinary people to recognize the signs of mental illness or anti-social behavior (anti-social as in potentially sociopathic and unusually aggressive, not as in shy) in friends and family, especially those who have expressed an interest in guns and weapons. That way, a peaceful intervention from loved ones to get needed help and shift them away from any dangerous weapons before problems arise can prevent future catastrophes.
As much as we'd like to think people like Adam Lanza, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, James Holmes and numerous other mass shooters never existed, we need to know where signs were missed and how to address future potential problems with smart proaction, especially from those who know and love the people who could end up joining those names.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)all day, every reporter on MSNBC today has called him "the shooter" and we can investigate what prompted his behavior without making him infamous.
Besides, what has anyone EVER learned about motives from a dead person? Nothing more than conjecture.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And honestly, my guess is more people will know what "Sandy Hook" is rather than "Adam Lanza". The event made the person, no matter whether one wants to specifically name names or not. And it's ultimately the event and not the person that will likely grab some people's morbid curiosity.
So hiding the name of the person just comes off as an exercise in futility. And refusing to discuss motives and warning signs in the lead up to the shooting is an exercise in stupidity.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Sandy Hook
Columbine
Fort Hood
Colorado theater
Etc
Noone is erasing those responsible just don't embed their names as icons in the public psyche
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And because we're not as stupid as to remove all references to these events taking place, any slight amount of research will unveil the name of the perpetrator.
I just see this as a non-issue. None of these people are being celebrated in the first place, so why do people talk about it as if we are?
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)That way we can learn something about what makes these people tick